TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
Whitnall out? http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1792 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | teknodeejay [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Whitnall out? |
One of my colleagues came into work saying they heard on the radio Whitnall might not play due to an injury. Can anyone confirm or deny? |
Author: | Synbad [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:29 am ] |
Post subject: | |
They shoot horses dont they???? Lance has to stay fit for himself. He did have a bit of an ankle problem that goes way back when... Its the same ankle he has been favouring last year. Hopefully its not foot stress fractures. I know he wasnt 100% at training on Monday. (foot/ ankle wise) Could be something in that and the decision to not activate Setanta onto the senior list might just come back and bite us on the arse. We just have to do it... |
Author: | Megaman [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:11 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Oh dear, we are about due for our now annual foot stress fracture case though, lets hope not. |
Author: | MarkNo3 [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:18 am ] |
Post subject: | |
James Brayshaw made a smart arse remark on MMM this morning. It took it to mean no Fev (susoension) and no Whits (no form as yet). Is today too late to place someone and bring a rookie onto the senior list? I know the are fines for altering team sheets prior to games but it'd be worth it I think. |
Author: | BlueMark [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
So Synbad you knew that Whits has/had an injury as I did, but you still choose to slam him, despite the fact the injury clearly inhibated him last year and has had an effect this year. You are a harsh man Synbad a harsh man...lets hope none of your employees suffer a workplace injury, they will be on the scrapheap before the workcover form goes in. |
Author: | Synbad [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:29 am ] |
Post subject: | |
BM you Genius, everyone has an injury of some kind. Gehrig kicked 100 with a bad foot last year.... ![]() If you know anything about the players they all play with something and an injection. Lance isnt a once off... |
Author: | BlueMark [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:34 am ] |
Post subject: | |
You are a harsh man Synbad. What Herbs should I use in my sauce, just to give a little flavour? And Spring onions are they OK? I do chop em fine. |
Author: | Synbad [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:37 am ] |
Post subject: | |
BM, you wouldnt even know how to get a sauce happening even if i wrote it down for you.. for you id recommend the Paul Newman spaghetti sauce. Twist the cap and pour ![]() Just wait for it to come on sale... BTW his ankle wasnt a workplace injury.. it was because he played indoor cricket . But then you knew that.. you just were not saying..(of course ! ![]() |
Author: | teknodeejay [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:50 am ] |
Post subject: | |
So the question still begs... is he in or out? Does anyone know for sure? |
Author: | Synbad [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:53 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Blue Mark isnt saying... |
Author: | Rod Waddell [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:05 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Always had a soft spot for Lance but...............my pateince is wearing thin. Is the same man that in the space of 6 weeks has shown fans glimpses of his pre 2001 form (wiz cup) and post 2001 form (H&A). What gives? |
Author: | spf [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:18 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Rod Waddell wrote: What gives?
Apparently (or not so apparently)...his ankle. ![]() |
Author: | Synbad [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Whitnall completed training ok on Wednesday night and is expected to play. He has a niggle but so has everyone else. To put people in the picture he wore a runner and a boot out to training for part of Mondays training but completed it ok.Wednesday he wore two boots and completed training. Whoever started that story probably heard about the single boot on Monday. (I dont know if it was a blister, his ankle or a stress fracture.. if it was stress fracture he wouldnt have trained Wednesday.. if it was an ankle it wouldnt make a difference what shoe he wore.. As far as i know he is 100% to play. |
Author: | BlueMark [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
He'll play. Well he will at least attend. |
Author: | billc3 [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
BlueMark wrote: He'll play. Well he will at least attend.
Harsh man...I thought he's been Ok |
Author: | BlueMark [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
billc3 wrote: BlueMark wrote: He'll play. Well he will at least attend. Harsh man...I thought he's been Ok ![]() ![]() |
Author: | fullmont101 [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
BlueMark wrote: billc3 wrote: BlueMark wrote: He'll play. Well he will at least attend. Harsh man...I thought he's been Ok ![]() ![]() So u will be going after Campo in ur next post BlueMark? |
Author: | BlueMark [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
If the skier doesn't get 30 possessions, kicks a bag, lays 15 tackles and breaks a leg then he is in for the biggest burst since Kakatoa. Weak greedy self centred bastard. |
Author: | fullmont101 [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
BlueMark wrote: If the skier doesn't get 30 possessions, kicks a bag, lays 15 tackles and breaks a leg then he is in for the biggest burst since Kakatoa. Weak greedy self centred bastard.
Not bad BlueMark but u left out something about the leadership. |
Author: | Synbad [ Fri Apr 29, 2005 4:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
BlueMark wrote: If the skier doesn't get 30 possessions, kicks a bag, lays 15 tackles and breaks a leg then he is in for the biggest burst since Kakatoa. Weak greedy self centred bastard.
If the skiier did that he would nt be a down hill skiier.,. hed be a footballer.. unfortunately he doesnt do anything like that but he skis alot.. downhill.. got the aerodynamic helmet and the goggles too.weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!! The skiier goes up to find out his worth at the end of the season. He doesnt have to convince me... he can convince Denis... We find out what the skiier is worth then... ![]() |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |