| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Goal kicking spread http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=17598 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | verbs [ Sat Aug 25, 2007 11:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Goal kicking spread |
How does this work? Fevola 59 Fisher 39 Waite 27 Lappin 21 Whitnall 18 Betts 16 Simpson 16 O'hAilpin 13 Murphy 11 Yet we are second last.... 
We haven't had a spread like that for many years. On the other hand we have had our worst run of defensive scores in forever -- 20 games in a row of more than 100 points against. It's one of the best goal kicking spreads I've seen since 1995, yet we are anchored at the bottom. |
|
| Author: | 4everBlue [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goal kicking spread |
verbs wrote: How does this work?
Fevola 59 Fisher 39 Waite 27 Lappin 21 Whitnall 18 Betts 16 Simpson 16 O'hAilpin 13 Murphy 11 Yet we are second last.... We haven't had a spread like that for many years. On the other hand we have had our worst run of defensive scores in forever -- 20 games in a row of more than 100 points against. It's one of the best goal kicking spreads I've seen since 1995, yet we are anchored at the bottom. Thanks Verbs. It's bad enough thinking about it - it's even worse seeing the figures! |
|
| Author: | verbs [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
The second half of the table is interesting. Brisbane in their prime had five or sx midfileders who kicked 20+ a year. So we need more. But it all adds up for us to be quite good but...??? |
|
| Author: | verbs [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Just looking at my 95 spreadsheet: Kernahan 63 Pearce 52 Spalding 34 Clape 31 Williams 29 Koutoufides 22 Rice 21 Hanna 14 Brown 13 Bradley 12 Ratten 12 Camporeale 11 We'renot even half-way there.But I don't know if we have a better spread since 1995. Maybe in 99/00. |
|
| Author: | Ads [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Goals: Brad Fisher 39 Nick Riewoldt 39 Not a bad effort by Fish 
|
|
| Author: | 4everBlue [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 12:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
verbs wrote: The second half of the table is interesting.
Brisbane in their prime had five or sx midfileders who kicked 20+ a year. So we need more. But it all adds up for us to be quite good but...??? That's the only thing I don't like about our current group of young midfielders - they aren't really goal kickers. Hopefully they will get a few on the board once their experience and confidence grows, but at the moment, simmo is really the only goal-kicker amongst them. That's also the reason why I would love to see Palmer picked up in the draft. |
|
| Author: | Jarusa [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
IIRC in 2000 we had 16 players with 10 goals or more. Our spread of goalkickers this year is not that much different to the last few years. Still a long way to go (especially when you take out Lappin and Whitnall). |
|
| Author: | TheGame [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Like you already mentioned Verbs our problems lie in the defence! In the last 5 years the dark lord has developed one regular defender. |
|
| Author: | Stefchook [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
verbs wrote: The second half of the table is interesting.
Brisbane in their prime had five or sx midfileders who kicked 20+ a year. So we need more. More goals from midfield. And more goals from smaller forwards. That's where we really struggle compared with the other sides. I'm guessing that our percentage of goals from tall forwards would be considerably higher than any other clubs. We really need a couple of classy half forward goalkickers. |
|
| Author: | blueblues [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Stefchook wrote: verbs wrote: The second half of the table is interesting. Brisbane in their prime had five or sx midfileders who kicked 20+ a year. So we need more. More goals from midfield. And more goals from smaller forwards. That's where we really struggle compared with the other sides. I'm guessing that our percentage of goals from tall forwards would be considerably higher than any other clubs. We really need a couple of classy half forward goalkickers. Exactly. |
|
| Author: | thedominator [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goal kicking spread |
verbs wrote: How does this work?
Fevola 59 Fisher 39 Waite 27 Lappin 21 Whitnall 18 Betts 16 Simpson 16 O'hAilpin 13 Murphy 11 Yet we are second last.... We haven't had a spread like that for many years. On the other hand we have had our worst run of defensive scores in forever -- 20 games in a row of more than 100 points against. It's one of the best goal kicking spreads I've seen since 1995, yet we are anchored at the bottom. Which basically tells you that if we get the back half right with a better ruck division the turnaround can come pretty quick. |
|
| Author: | winfieldblue [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
ruckmen should kick 15-20 goals per year IMO..cox, lade, ottens, fraser, white would be very close to this mark... you know what this means? kreuzer! kreuzer! kreuzer! |
|
| Author: | Donstuie [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Goal kicking spread |
verbs wrote: How does this work?
Fevola 59 Fisher 39 Waite 27 Lappin 21 Whitnall 18 Betts 16 Simpson 16 O'hAilpin 13 Murphy 11 Yet we are second last.... Carlton For: 2059 (avg 98 ) Against: 2772 (avg 132) There's your answer |
|
| Author: | Warby [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Our defence has been the worst in the Comp. all year. Ratts....Crosisca and the recruiters have heaps of work to do !! |
|
| Author: | winfieldblue [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 6:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Warby wrote: Our defence has been the worst in the Comp. all year.
Ratts....Crosisca and the recruiters have heaps of work to do !! just take walker out of defence and you saved the team five goals per game. my backline.... b: anderson austin jamison hb: bower thornton scotland |
|
| Author: | tommi [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
 ........!
there's my backline..............! kindest regards tommi |
|
| Author: | verbs [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jarusa wrote: IIRC in 2000 we had 16 players with 10 goals or more.
Our spread of goalkickers this year is not that much different to the last few years. Still a long way to go (especially when you take out Lappin and Whitnall). I think our spread is better than it has been for the past few years, without going to deeply into it. |
|
| Author: | George Harris [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
tommi wrote: ........!there's my backline..............! kindest regards tommi Pretty good spread there, Tommi. |
|
| Author: | tommi [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cheers Mr Harris............. but you wouldn't go too deeply into it...............! kindest regards tommi |
|
| Author: | keogh [ Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The guy on the right obviously went too deeply. Looks like he broke his arm in the process. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|