Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 9:09 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:50 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:00 pm
Posts: 2550
Location: Safe distance away
mandy wrote:
Blues Clues wrote:
At least I know the name of that Bob Fraser guy who the Pies took at Pick 1, you know that "saviour" ruckman guy, a game breaking colossus that would take the Pies to footballing immortality. Oh sorry, Josh..... :wink:


I don't get the negativity from opposition supporters towards Josh. You'd be hard pressed to find a Pie supporter that wasn't happy with his contribution to our team.

Certainly didn't turn out to be the star ruckman we'd been hoping for, but a very good player nonetheless.


And you should be happy with him as he's good value.

I guess if we look at it another way though, all of us seem to be clamouring for a priority pick ( me included :oops: ) but using that draft as an example. If you offered me Fraser and Fiora or Pavlich I know which option I'm picking.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:17 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:41 am
Posts: 395
Location: Juddville
Beantown wrote:
mandy wrote:
Blues Clues wrote:
At least I know the name of that Bob Fraser guy who the Pies took at Pick 1, you know that "saviour" ruckman guy, a game breaking colossus that would take the Pies to footballing immortality. Oh sorry, Josh..... :wink:


I don't get the negativity from opposition supporters towards Josh. You'd be hard pressed to find a Pie supporter that wasn't happy with his contribution to our team.

Certainly didn't turn out to be the star ruckman we'd been hoping for, but a very good player nonetheless.


And you should be happy with him as he's good value.

I guess if we look at it another way though, all of us seem to be clamouring for a priority pick ( me included :oops: ) but using that draft as an example. If you offered me Fraser and Fiora or Pavlich I know which option I'm picking.


IMO he's a been a perfect fit for the filth...an almost type of player for an almost type of club. The law of attraction (i.e. "the secret" ) at work.. :-D

_________________
" Koutoufides has taken the last quarter by the scruff of the neck..." Commentary Drew Morphett Last Qtr '99 Prelim. Pure Gold.

Thanks for the memories Kouta. You are and always will be a True Blue Carlton Legend. #43.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:31 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:12 am
Posts: 10076
Did I say Tanking? Ohhhhh, I meant Wanking!

_________________
Oompa loompa doompety dee
If you are wise you'll listen to me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:43 pm 
Offline
Melbourne Supporter

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 5:19 pm
Posts: 301
mandy wrote:
I don't get the negativity from opposition supporters towards Josh. You'd be hard pressed to find a Pie supporter that wasn't happy with his contribution to our team.

Certainly didn't turn out to be the star ruckman we'd been hoping for, but a very good player nonetheless.


Really Mandy you should get out more with your fellow Magpie cognoscenti ...

http://p100.ezboard.com/ftheouterfrm56.showMessageRange?topicID=2551.topic&start=1&stop=25

The old bastard Sheedy would actually be good for us from a promotional point of view and providing we recognise that's what he's there for and put a team of assistants in place to do the real coaching and keep him away from recruiting Campos, Michaels and Zantucks, in fact keep him away from rectruiting altogether, I think he's a good choice for us.

Look we are awful and Ratten can't help himself - we can still lose R22.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:52 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:01 am
Posts: 19089
Location: Wherever bh thinks I should be.
old55 wrote:
Really Mandy you should get out more with your fellow Magpie cognoscenti ...

http://p100.ezboard.com/ftheouterfrm56.showMessageRange?topicID=2551.topic&start=1&stop=25


There's a lot of support for Josh in that thread.

_________________
SIDE BY SIDE
COOOOOLLLLLIIIINGWOOOOOOOD

Wojee wrote:
Harmes was out


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 1514
Location: Deep Blue Sea
Hypothetically .... Just say Melbourne and Carlton were both going into Round 22 with 4 wins each following on from 3.5 or 4 wins each the previous year. Then what?

Think outside the square ...... the winner gets the PP otherwise it would be one ugly game of football.

_________________
"IF YOU FAIL TO PREPARE, YOU'RE PREPARED TO FAIL" - Mark Spitz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:03 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 11563
Location: Brisbane
Navy One wrote:
Hypothetically .... Just say Melbourne and Carlton were both going into Round 22 with 4 wins each following on from 3.5 or 4 wins each the previous year. Then what?

Think outside the square ...... the winner gets the PP otherwise it would be one ugly game of football.


Both teams forfeit at exactly the same time. :-D

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:23 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 20969
Location: Missing Kouta
Rohan Connolly's final ladder still has Carlton securing the priority pick.

Image

My gut tells me we won't be able to stop Essendon* and Melbourne from kicking a winning score.

I don't read much into the results against the Hawks and Swans.

The Demons and Bombers have the rucks to beat us in the middle and give them first use of the ball.

The Saints and Pies have average rucks.

Kosi missed the second game after he tore Ackland a new one earlier in the year and ran off him to be another marking option up forward. We might be without Setanta which would unbalance us in the ruck and the backline if his injury puts him out for the year. :(

Thornton, Saddington, Bannister, Scotland, Bower, Houlihan and Jamison aren't a match for Lucas, Lloyd, Hille/Laycock, Welsh, Gumbleton, Hird, Neitz, Bate, Davey, Sylvia, Robertson and Dunn if they break even in the midfield. Ben Holland is a hack, but he's the type of key forward who is made to look good by our undersized defence and bobs up to kick two goals.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:16 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22322
more great inside info :garthp:

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:26 am 
Offline
Melbourne Supporter

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 5:19 pm
Posts: 301
Even if we do win in R22, the way % is trending we'll still finish 15th and you'll get 1 & 4.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:36 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
What Rohan hasn't taken into account is percentage. The way it's going, even if Melbourne beat us, we'll still be 14th on percentage.

Which makes it just that bit harder to secure a decent player in the PSD. As well as giving us 1 and 4 instead of 1 and 3.

Perhaps a 6-8 goal defeat this weekend is in order. Hey - If we're tanking, we may as well do it properly 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:30 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:56 pm
Posts: 2277
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Give Fev, Fisher and Carrots a few weeks off, Should do the trick :wink:

_________________
Lawrence Lawrence, The man who knows all the rackets and all the racketeers!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:34 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:12 am
Posts: 10076
w~w

_________________
Oompa loompa doompety dee
If you are wise you'll listen to me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:13 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: THE BEACH
I reckon we should start tankiing for next year, and the next, and the next................keep getting the first 2 picks,........we'll be unbeatable one day :)

_________________
I see you watching me watching you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:42 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
buzzaaaah wrote:
We may as well win every game we play from now, because there is no hope in hell that the Dees can beat us in Rd 22


You ve just depressed the hell out of me

I'm flowering sick of this, its to stressful, the prospect of winning is depressing the $%^%$ out of me.

How any logically minded Carlton supporter who has lived through the pain of dark Friday and endured the disappointment of mediocrity since then can be satisfied with the short term tension relief associated with a win and not see the long term value associated with a loss in the remaining games puzzles the @#$# out of me.

The bulls#$t that I read about early picks not guaranteeing success is naive. Nothing is guaranteed but the law of statistics will tell you clearly that the more early picks you have the more likely you are to benefit. If this wasn't the case the draft system wouldn't exist nor would the priority system.







JUST TANK FFS & FLOWER THE MORAL HIGH GROUND


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:50 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Not sure if the non Tankers have the moral high ground...

There are no guarantees but there are guarantees of giving yourself more opportunity.
Its called playng the percentages...




*edited by mods*

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:01 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10324
Location: Coburg
the whole point is there is no moral ground
high or low, there are opinions by people who have no influence on decisins made by those who may or may not be tanking but who can never come out and say it if they are (and will always say they are not).

My beef is not with tanking, if people want to go and cry out for a loss
or a win, that's their choice.

I hate people posts where they slag off at other people's choices (as if that is influencing the team 1 iota )

and I hate the misconception put forward as an argument that a game is meaningless.

All games are and are not – I’ts an individual thing - the rest is reality tv syndrome.



*edited by mods*

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:30 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
As much as I dislike the tanking "debate", this topic was going along with no problems for 3 pages.

Some posts have been edited, others deleted, due to posters moving along into the realm of personal abuse (again).

Please, pretty please, put forward your opinions without resorting to schoolyard taunts.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group