TalkingCarlton
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

Hats off
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16432		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Sedat [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Hats off
Terrific performace by Carlton today. Hunted in numbers and had an exceptionally good functioning forward line full of mobile talls and mids which stifled our normal supply of rebound off half back. You guys are playing an exciting brand of football, and had we not had Haris and Morris in our defensive 50, the result would have been a shite site worse.

Carazzo is the most improved AFL footballer in 2007.
Author:  jimmae [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:58 pm ]
Post subject: 
Cheers Sedat, pleasure as always.
Author:  Beantown [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:59 pm ]
Post subject: 
Quality post Sedat. Most people here would realise the doggies can play alot better than that and that we got you on a bad day ( not saying I wasn't exstatic with the effort ). However you made no mention of that, very gracious.
Author:  bluebeard [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Hats off
Sedat wrote:
Terrific performace by Carlton today. Hunted in numbers and had an exceptionally good functioning forward line full of mobile talls and mids which stifled our normal supply of rebound off half back. You guys are playing an exciting brand of football, and had we not had Haris and Morris in our defensive 50, the result would have been a shite site worse.

Carazzo is the most improved AFL footballer in 2007.


Harris was their "finger in the dyke".

He repelled 50% of our forward entries in the final term.

If he had'nt...we would have won a lot easier.
Author:  TheGame [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:13 pm ]
Post subject: 
That Higgins can play a bit.
Author:  Sedat [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
TheGame wrote:
That Higgins can play a bit.

Offensively - my word.
Defensively - not yet.
Author:  4thchicken [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:23 pm ]
Post subject: 
Sedat wrote:
TheGame wrote:
That Higgins can play a bit.

Offensively - my word.
Defensively - not yet.


I'd take him in a heartbeat - for some reason he reminds me of a very young nathan brown (hopefully without the injuries/personality). Should develop into a very handy FP/HFF in the next few years with a longer term view to midfield. Such a good finisher and seems to have time when he has the ball.
Author:  bluebeard [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:25 pm ]
Post subject: 
I have to say it...

The Doggies are my 2nd team (hides for cover).

I really like the way they play and I reckon they will still be dangerous in September.

Hahn did'nt do much today and McMahon was pretty quiet.

Cooney is a superstar, as is Gia.

But Harris was easily your best player today.

I had a feeling before the match that we would match up well on you though.

I knew it was going to be a shootout...it was a great game to watch.

good luck Sedat for the rest of the year.
Author:  buzzalenko [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:29 pm ]
Post subject: 
good on you Sedat - grace and class in defeat
Author:  mikkey [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:10 pm ]
Post subject: 
Never had a problem with WB supporters. Sat in a box full of them and they were all gracefull in defeat.
Author:  Electric Blue [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:11 pm ]
Post subject: 
buzzalenko wrote:
good on you Sedat - grace and class in defeat


QFT



Bulldogs- The official 2nd favourite team for MANY of the posters here, myself included.
Author:  Kaptain Kouta [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:11 pm ]
Post subject: 
buzzalenko wrote:
good on you Sedat - grace and class in defeat


Agree. Grace in defeat is a sign of a true gentleman. Wouldn't expect anything less from Sedat.
Author:  AGRO [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:39 pm ]
Post subject: 
mikkey wrote:
Never had a problem with WB supporters. Sat in a box full of them and they were all gracefull in defeat.



Well listen to SEN tomorrow on the soapbox - if I get on before 6.00pm "Chris from Werribee" is going to get his come uppence. :twisted:
Author:  bluehammer [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:47 pm ]
Post subject: 
4thchicken wrote:
Sedat wrote:
TheGame wrote:
That Higgins can play a bit.

Offensively - my word.
Defensively - not yet.


I'd take him in a heartbeat - for some reason he reminds me of a very young nathan brown (hopefully without the injuries/personality). Should develop into a very handy FP/HFF in the next few years with a longer term view to midfield. Such a good finisher and seems to have time when he has the ball.


Higgins reminds me of a very young Ben Cousins. In looks and kicking style.

Let's hope for your sake Sedat that's where it ends.
Author:  camel [ Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:51 pm ]
Post subject: 
Sedat wrote:
TheGame wrote:
That Higgins can play a bit.

Offensively - my word.
Defensively - not yet.


He shits me. :lol:

The comment was made by Tim Watson that Lance was born 20 years too late in that his athleticism isn't up to modern standards. Similarly, if Higgins played 20 years ago he would have had to stand a player of the ilk of Rhys-Jones and, well, he'd earn his money every week I reckon.

:lol:

Onya Sedat, how do you reckon the umpires went today. Am I completely biased, or for much of the game did you really have three extra men playing for you?
Author:  Brently8 [ Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:00 am ]
Post subject: 
AGRO wrote:
mikkey wrote:
Never had a problem with WB supporters. Sat in a box full of them and they were all gracefull in defeat.



Well listen to SEN tomorrow on the soapbox - if I get on before 6.00pm "Chris from Werribee" is going to get his come uppence. :twisted:


Go you good thing!! :wink:
Author:  Blue Sombrero [ Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Hats off
bluebeard wrote:
Sedat wrote:
Terrific performace by Carlton today. Hunted in numbers and had an exceptionally good functioning forward line full of mobile talls and mids which stifled our normal supply of rebound off half back. You guys are playing an exciting brand of football, and had we not had Haris and Morris in our defensive 50, the result would have been a shite site worse.

Carazzo is the most improved AFL footballer in 2007.


Harris was their "finger in the dyke".

He repelled 50% of our forward entries in the final term.

If he had'nt...we would have won a lot easier.

Yet Eade slated him in public for only playing one quarter.
Author:  Blue Sombrero [ Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:59 am ]
Post subject: 
4thchicken wrote:
Sedat wrote:
TheGame wrote:
That Higgins can play a bit.

Offensively - my word.
Defensively - not yet.


I'd take him in a heartbeat - for some reason he reminds me of a very young nathan brown (hopefully without the injuries/personality). Should develop into a very handy FP/HFF in the next few years with a longer term view to midfield. Such a good finisher and seems to have time when he has the ball.

Robert Walls reckons he is an outside player who is only interested in getting easy kicks. Is that true?
Author:  TheGame [ Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:18 am ]
Post subject: 
Blue Sombrero wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Sedat wrote:
TheGame wrote:
That Higgins can play a bit.

Offensively - my word.
Defensively - not yet.


I'd take him in a heartbeat - for some reason he reminds me of a very young nathan brown (hopefully without the injuries/personality). Should develop into a very handy FP/HFF in the next few years with a longer term view to midfield. Such a good finisher and seems to have time when he has the ball.

Robert Walls reckons he is an outside player who is only interested in getting easy kicks. Is that true?


I like Walls but he isn't in touch with today's game. If the player isn't a big strong unit then he isn't a fan. He was really ripping on Aker yesterday saying he was soft but he wasn't that bad.
Author:  Kaptain Kouta [ Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:21 am ]
Post subject: 
Aker didn't play that well yesterday, and didn't have much impact ont he match at all. I love watching him on song, but was glad that he wasn't on yesterday, or he could have really cut us up, along with Eagleton, who regularly tears us a new one.
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/