| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| FEV-ITIS http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=16330 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Blue Beatle [ Sat May 26, 2007 6:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | FEV-ITIS |
Pagan heard to say in press conference on ABC that he looked at our inside 50's and found that we went to Fev 109 times and the next best Fisher with 14!! And he mostly is selfish - tried an imposible twist bounce goal when he could have centered to waite and/or houla. Yes, agree with scotland comment. still too much bombing |
|
| Author: | true_blue3 [ Sat May 26, 2007 6:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: FEV-ITIS |
Blue Beatle wrote: Fev 109 times and the next best Fisher with 14!!
that is incredible!! 
perfect stat to prove what everyone on here is complaining about and it shouldn't have taken pagan this long to realize this. even though fev is a champion player that is just unacceptable. |
|
| Author: | Mishgee [ Sat May 26, 2007 7:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
and of those 14 fisher probably had a better conversion rate??? |
|
| Author: | jimmae [ Sat May 26, 2007 7:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Mishgee wrote: and of those 14 fisher probably had a better conversion rate???
With 12 goals total for the season, I doubt you can draw a conclusive stat. |
|
| Author: | Ciccio [ Sun May 27, 2007 1:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Our players need to take repsonsibility for this aswell. The number of times we kick the ball to Fev when he has 3 defenders on him is ridiculous and shows that we are playing dumb football. Now Fev is a gun and there are times when he will still beat 2 or 3 defenders but common sense would suggest that the players should be hitting better and more open targets. The more unpredictable we can become about who we kick to inside our forward 50, the better we as a team will become and the opposition we have to think twice about double and triple teaming fev. This in turn will make our forward line and particularly Fev much more dangerous and damaging. |
|
| Author: | hadz [ Sun May 27, 2007 2:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Examples Tonsilitis = inflammation of the tonsils...Colitis = inflammation of the colon....arthritis = inflammation of arthritic joints What is inflammation of the Fev? |
|
| Author: | Ryan8024 [ Sun May 27, 2007 2:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
An oversized chin? |
|
| Author: | rhys87 [ Sun May 27, 2007 2:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
hadz wrote: Examples
Tonsilitis = inflammation of the tonsils.? they normally remove the tonsils to solve the problem, ha? 
|
|
| Author: | tommi [ Sun May 27, 2007 2:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Any "itis" is bad............. i haven't come across a good "itis" yet.............! kindest regards tommi |
|
| Author: | timetodeliver2004 [ Sun May 27, 2007 6:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
tommi wrote: Any "itis" is bad.............
i haven't come across a good "itis" yet.............! kindest regards tommi Orchitis is swelling of the testicles associated with mumps in adult males. Might be a handy one for some.... 
|
|
| Author: | hadz [ Sun May 27, 2007 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
rhys87 wrote: hadz wrote: Examples Tonsilitis = inflammation of the tonsils.? they normally remove the tonsils to solve the problem, ha? Hehe. The difference is we actually NEED fev (as opposed to our tonsils!) |
|
| Author: | 4thchicken [ Sun May 27, 2007 7:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
hadz wrote: rhys87 wrote: hadz wrote: Examples Tonsilitis = inflammation of the tonsils.? they normally remove the tonsils to solve the problem, ha? Hehe. The difference is we actually NEED fev (as opposed to our tonsils!) no we dont - especially if we get a really good deal for him 
Who knows it might even increase the development/performance of our other forwards due to the increased supply and opportunity. |
|
| Author: | Blue Beatle [ Sun May 27, 2007 8:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
hadz wrote: What is inflammation of the Fev?
WHEN HE LOSES HIS COOL - NORMALLY A COUPLE OF TIMES A GAME |
|
| Author: | moshe25 [ Sun May 27, 2007 8:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
What we actually need is a Paganectomy.......... |
|
| Author: | Blue Kiwi [ Mon May 28, 2007 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Being new to AFL I struggle to find why Carlton always seem to send long kicks to contests in the last quarter whilst other teams handball it up the field and maintain posession......... Is the fitness not there to do this? Sorry if the answer is obvious - I'm just struggling to see why our last quarter game plan is different even when we are in touch on the board. (ie: I understand long kicks if time is of the essence) |
|
| Author: | bluehammer [ Mon May 28, 2007 8:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think Brisbane was next highest going to Brown something like 80 times. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|