Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 01, 2025 9:46 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Talking guernsey numbers
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:49 pm 
Offline
formerly p(12)terg
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:46 pm
Posts: 7012
Location: Western Sydney, NSW.au
ryan2000 wrote:
I want the #43 to be retired when Kouta decides to hang up the boots!
Ryan raised this in the Dilemma thread, where Rich was looking for a number for his own guernsey.

If they retired a number on the retirement of a great, how many numbers would be available?

But the reason for this post is to find out: if they'd retired 25 after Jezza, what number would Fevs be now? (probably won't be a long thread!)

_________________
[Sam Jacobs] looks like a 7' Lance Whitnall, and [Mitch Robinson] looks like a 4' Lance Whitnall
(The SEN team during the Carlton v Cats 2009 pre-season match)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:02 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:20 pm
Posts: 789
Location: Melbourne
Most jumpers are only retired for a limited period perhaps 1 or 2 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:28 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
why retire 43 for Swan? Kouta wore it after him.... 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Sorry ryan, but if we were to start retiring numbers the following would all be retired before #43

1
2
4
7
11
25

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 9:09 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:58 pm
Posts: 3463
Location: Procyon II
The Club has a policy of retiring guernseys of premiership players for 1 year. Not that much of an issue at the moment, as Kouta is the only one with day premiership glory. But in a few years it will become an issue again. I believe the club is also open minded to retiring other guernseys for 1 year for special cases on a case by case level, but it is firm that any retirement can be for 1 year only. That way a young kid can aspire to wear the champion's number.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:50 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:01 pm
Posts: 173
Location: carnegie
By all means retire the jumper for one year out of respect for Kouta as he is a premiership player.
But not for all time.
With all respect, there have been plenty of better Carlton players in the last 50 years.
It would do a disservice to the likes of John Nicholls (the best we have ever had), Jezza, Kernahan, Doull, David McKay, Bradley, etc to name a few.
I've seen most of Kouta's and the above players games and apart from 10 or so stand out games he doesn't come near. Sure he has been cruely hampered by injury and family problems, but that's life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:32 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:54 am
Posts: 2361
Location: September Baby!!!!
I've said it before - Its the front of the jumper that matters - not the back!!!!
Clubs with losing mentalities make a big deal about jumper numbers- St Kilda is great at it with the handing over of guenseys - i think that the tigers do it too.
No jumper number is sacred - Good players and crap ones and club champions and blokes on the list for 2 years have worn all numbers.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 1:4, "One generation passes away, and another generation comes: but The Blues abide forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
We need to be careful with this. According to my calculations, Tex has another 14 years of footy in him. :shock: So that will make Jack Silvagni 26 when we draft him under the father-son rule and put him in the #1 worn by Serge and Steven. We should have retired the #1 knowing that Steve and his missus were churning out boys at the rapid rate. Having a Silvagni in another number is unthinkable. We will need them to be 1, 1A and 1B when the time comes. Although if one distorts the letters a bit we could make that 1, 14 1nd 18. So now we need to trade Tex in 2014 and retire the numbers 14 and 18 by 2015 and 2016. That means Fish will have to retire early due to shoulder problems and if we get Judd at the end of the year we can give him 18 on the condition he only play for the next 8 years. Hardly worth it. Having Judd for 8 years that is.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:03 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:36 pm
Posts: 1289
Location: here
Blue Sombrero wrote:
We need to be careful with this. According to my calculations, Tex has another 14 years of footy in him. :shock: So that will make Jack Silvagni 26 when we draft him under the father-son rule and put him in the #1 worn by Serge and Steven. We should have retired the #1 knowing that Steve and his missus were churning out boys at the rapid rate. Having a Silvagni in another number is unthinkable. We will need them to be 1, 1A and 1B when the time comes. Although if one distorts the letters a bit we could make that 1, 14 1nd 18. So now we need to trade Tex in 2014 and retire the numbers 14 and 18 by 2015 and 2016. That means Fish will have to retire early due to shoulder problems and if we get Judd at the end of the year we can give him 18 on the condition he only play for the next 8 years. Hardly worth it. Having Judd for 8 years that is.


How about 1%?

_________________
They coud'nt.....could they?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:02 pm 
Offline
formerly p(12)terg
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:46 pm
Posts: 7012
Location: Western Sydney, NSW.au
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Sorry ryan, but if we were to start retiring numbers the following would all be retired before #43

1
2
4
7
11
25
22 (Harry Vallance) would be another

_________________
[Sam Jacobs] looks like a 7' Lance Whitnall, and [Mitch Robinson] looks like a 4' Lance Whitnall
(The SEN team during the Carlton v Cats 2009 pre-season match)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:10 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
yeah but Kouta is different..............

I dunno, maybe i biased. But Kouta is just magical. Not saying he's the greatest of all time, but i am saying that somebody will be hard-pressed to do that #43 justice that it deserves.

Fev is doing the #25 justice.
Walker is doing the #1 justice.

But #43? Oh man, the things i saw in that #43 were just breath-taking! STUNNING! Stuff i haven't even seen Chris Judd do, and he could well be the GOAT!

I don't think there will be anybody quite like kouta. And here's proof................

Anytime you see Judd go near the ball, everybody pays attention. It's freaky how much everybody pauses to see what he'll do!
But Kouta..............................oh man,................to hear the crowd chant 'KOUTA' 'KOUTA' 'KOUTA' is something i've never heard before!

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20260
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
I hate the idea of 'retiring' a jumper. 1 or 2 seasons off, fine, but I really like the fact that Gibbs has the opportunity to fulfil in the #4 jumper what Judas and Livo couldn't, think about the brilliance of the #2 jumper, isn't it better to have your name on a locker after John Nicholls and Greg Williams, the legacy of a number is something that's carried forward.

Dominic Fotia, that could have been you. :lol:

Reflect on a number for a year or so, then give it to the next crop to add to the history.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:36 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: Elwood
Blue Sombrero wrote:
We need to be careful with this. According to my calculations, Tex has another 14 years of footy in him. :shock: So that will make Jack Silvagni 26 when we draft him under the father-son rule and put him in the #1 worn by Serge and Steven. We should have retired the #1 knowing that Steve and his missus were churning out boys at the rapid rate. Having a Silvagni in another number is unthinkable. We will need them to be 1, 1A and 1B when the time comes. Although if one distorts the letters a bit we could make that 1, 14 1nd 18. So now we need to trade Tex in 2014 and retire the numbers 14 and 18 by 2015 and 2016. That means Fish will have to retire early due to shoulder problems and if we get Judd at the end of the year we can give him 18 on the condition he only play for the next 8 years. Hardly worth it. Having Judd for 8 years that is.


We could always give Walker 43, the the boys could wear 1, 21 and 31.
Austin can wear a lower number by then also. A choice of 9,10 11,12,13 or 15 Blackwell takes 8 . 8) 8)

Just some forward thinking and planning is all that lies ahead. :P

TB what are you on about ? Get out of here...

_________________
I know a little secret. And i'm not sharing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:46 pm 
Offline
formerly p(12)terg
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:46 pm
Posts: 7012
Location: Western Sydney, NSW.au
That's actually a great idea - retire a number for a year or two!

Explains why #16 was re-used so quickly (probably so we would forget a former occupant)

But it would be interesting, if they retired numbers for good after a player achieved a certain milestone who would have what numbers now?

So, who has scored a ton (surely 22 H Vallance came close)? Who has played more than 300 games (besides 11 B Doull & 21 C Bradley)? Which captains have guided us to 3, 4, or more flags?

If they'd retired those numbers for good using only those criteria, who would have what numbers now? What other criteria could they use?

_________________
[Sam Jacobs] looks like a 7' Lance Whitnall, and [Mitch Robinson] looks like a 4' Lance Whitnall
(The SEN team during the Carlton v Cats 2009 pre-season match)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:16 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
p(12)terg wrote:
So, who has scored a ton (surely 22 H Vallance came close)?


the only carlton player to have kicked a ton is jezza (in 1970) when he kicked 115 goals.

harry vallence's highest tally was an agonisingly close 97 back in 1932.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 11:41 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14735
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
I can't wait to get the mighty Johnny Browns' (or whoever) number 265 on the back of my new jumper, good thing I got an XXL :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group