TalkingCarlton :: View topic - The Sheedy Youth-goal to goal line

hate to defend the filth that is the EFC* - but what Sheedy would counter with is throwing up pathetic examples of who will take these players places - I can't be bothered working it out but I would say that they believe they have replacements ready for when the time comes....................I don't necessarily agree with this

Essendon-goal to goal line

Michael--30 this year
Fletcher--32 this year
Hird--34
Lucas--30 this year
Lloyd--30 next year

kingkerna wrote:

?
Lee
Hislop
Gumbleton
Johns

Carlton-goal to goal line

Setanta 24
Thorhton 23
Murphy 19
Kennedy 19
Fev 26

Question: Who would you prefer????

Where does Ryder play?

Scott if we get any injuries we aren't exactly sitting pretty either - same goes for all clubs though - that's the AFL for you though

kingkerna wrote:

Where does Ryder play?

Scott if we get any injuries we aren't exactly sitting pretty either - same goes for all clubs though - that's the AFL for you though

indeed, but they are all going to be there in 2 years.

can the same be said for bummers?

flower i hope we beat them, ivealready got mates talking them up.

the media fanfare that these flower generate is beyond me, through in two players that do nothing but run fast and tackle, and suddenly they have paceand playing finals?

and the media believes it

they are shit

ScottSaunders wrote:

kingkerna wrote:

Where does Ryder play?

Scott if we get any injuries we aren't exactly sitting pretty either - same goes for all clubs though - that's the AFL for you though

Amen Scott!

We hear the same shit every flower year and every flower year the media swallow it like oysters washed down with chilled Chalbis. It's ridiculous the easy run they get.

We've got pace - Russell, Simpson, Betts
We've got exciting KPP players - JFK, Carlos
We've got A DAMN SIGHT MORE YOUTH THAN THEM and still the Baby Bombers shit spews forth. Hate it hate it hate it hate it hate it.

flower media eating out of the Essendon* hand. For flower's sake!

Don't discount Kepler Bradley so quickly. It was pretty clear that he got too big, too quick.

Author:	eric pascoe [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:34 am ]
Post subject:	The Sheedy Youth-goal to goal line
Essendon-goal to goal line Michael--30 this year Fletcher--32 this year Hird--34 Lucas--30 this year Lloyd--30 next year Carlton-goal to goal line Setanta 24 Thorhton 23 Murphy 19 Kennedy 19 Fev 26 Question: Who would you prefer????

Author:	Navy Blue Horse [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:20 am ]
Post subject:
Bombers - tick, tick, tick

Author:	Blueboy [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 9:30 am ]
Post subject:
Gotta say I'm pretty happy we don't have 3 knobs like Lloyd, Lucas and Fletcher at our club. In saying that our boys are going to have to be on their game this week.

Author:	billc3 [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 9:58 am ]
Post subject:
Gee eric...that's so unfair...Lloyd 30 next year... Apply the same to us and we have Kennedy AND Murphy both turn 20.... Looks mightly different doesn't it...

Author:	Barnesy [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:01 am ]
Post subject:
I would be happy with Lucas at chf for us at the moment. But sure, as that goal to goal line develops / matures great.

TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

The Sheedy Youth-goal to goal line http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=15613	Page 1 of 2

Author:	kingkerna [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:13 am ]
Post subject:
hate to defend the filth that is the EFC* - but what Sheedy would counter with is throwing up pathetic examples of who will take these players places - I can't be bothered working it out but I would say that they believe they have replacements ready for when the time comes....................I don't necessarily agree with this

Author:	Effes [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:35 am ]
Post subject:
kingkerna wrote: hate to defend the filth that is the EFC* - but what Sheedy would counter with is throwing up pathetic examples of who will take these players places - I can't be bothered working it out but I would say that they believe they have replacements ready for when the time comes....................I don't necessarily agree with this ? Lee Hislop Gumbleton Johns

Author:	SnickerS [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:35 am ]
Post subject:
Ill give it a try for your Kerna... Michael -- ?? Fletcher -- Bradley (yeah right) Hird -- ?? Lucas-- Gumbleton Lloyd-- Johns/Nash

Author:	ScottSaunders [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:41 am ]
Post subject:	Re: The Sheedy Youth-goal to goal line
eric pascoe wrote: Essendon-goal to goal line Michael--30 this year Fletcher--32 this year Hird--34 Lucas--30 this year Lloyd--30 next year and if just one of them gets an injury, they are [REDACTED]. buwahaha if two get an injury, they are beyond [REDACTED]

Author:	kingkerna [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:56 am ]
Post subject:
Where does Ryder play? Scott if we get any injuries we aren't exactly sitting pretty either - same goes for all clubs though - that's the AFL for you though

Author:	Kouta [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:06 am ]
Post subject:
Effes wrote: kingkerna wrote: hate to defend the filth that is the EFC* - but what Sheedy would counter with is throwing up pathetic examples of who will take these players places - I can't be bothered working it out but I would say that they believe they have replacements ready for when the time comes....................I don't necessarily agree with this ? Lee Hislop Gumbleton Johns Kepler Bradley? Our spine will be better going forward.

Author:	zoneman [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:54 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: The Sheedy Youth-goal to goal line
eric pascoe wrote: Carlton-goal to goal line Setanta 24 Thorhton 23 Murphy 19 Kennedy 19 Fev 26 Question: Who would you prefer???? Correction: Add: Pratt 72 Sensational

Author:	ScottSaunders [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:07 pm ]
Post subject:
kingkerna wrote: Where does Ryder play? Scott if we get any injuries we aren't exactly sitting pretty either - same goes for all clubs though - that's the AFL for you though indeed, but they are all going to be there in 2 years. can the same be said for bummers? @#$%&! i hope we beat them, ivealready got mates talking them up. the media fanfare that these cauliflower generate is beyond me, through in two players that do nothing but run fast and tackle, and suddenly they have paceand playing finals? and the media believes it they are shit

Author:	thehalford [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:15 pm ]
Post subject:
ScottSaunders wrote: kingkerna wrote: Where does Ryder play? Scott if we get any injuries we aren't exactly sitting pretty either - same goes for all clubs though - that's the AFL for you though indeed, but they are all going to be there in 2 years. can the same be said for bummers? flower i hope we beat them, ivealready got mates talking them up. the media fanfare that these flower generate is beyond me, through in two players that do nothing but run fast and tackle, and suddenly they have paceand playing finals? and the media believes it they are shit Amen Scott! We hear the same shit every @#$%&! year and every @#$%&! year the media swallow it like oysters washed down with chilled Chalbis. It's ridiculous the easy run they get. We've got pace - Russell, Simpson, Betts We've got exciting KPP players - JFK, Carlos We've got A DAMN SIGHT MORE YOUTH THAN THEM and still the Baby Bombers shit spews forth. Hate it hate it hate it hate it hate it. @#$%&! media eating out of the Essendon* hand. For @#$%&!'s sake!

Author:	Elwood Blues1 [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:19 pm ]
Post subject:
Ryder Mcphee Stanton/Monfries Gumbleton Johns re: the pace Lovett, Davey, Jetta, Winderlich and Dempsey are very quick....they are up in the express category...like Wojinski showed we dont have anyone that quick...except for Benjiman who is work in progress..... Wojinksi made our players look like statues and he was having to bounce the ball, which slows you down..... All of the above are front runners though....deny them the footy and slam their little bodies into the turf when you tackle them and you can overcome the lack of pace......

Author:	Molly [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 5:17 pm ]
Post subject:
They are doing exactly what we did in 2004... They think they've bottomed out, but they haven't. So what they've done now is to group together some old champions, and bring in some re-treads and hope that they can win a flag. But all they are doing is papering over cracks in a wall, and all it will cost them is a shot at draft picks number 1 and 2 this year, and ensure that they'll really bottom out when Lucas, Hird, Lloyd, and Fletcher hang up the boots. Remember when we came tenth on the back of Teague, French, Bannister, etc? Well this is just Essendon*'s way of copying.

Page 1 of 2	All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Kouta [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:34 pm ]
Post subject:
thehalford wrote: ScottSaunders wrote: kingkerna wrote: Where does Ryder play? Scott if we get any injuries we aren't exactly sitting pretty either - same goes for all clubs though - that's the AFL for you though indeed, but they are all going to be there in 2 years. can the same be said for bummers? flower i hope we beat them, ivealready got mates talking them up. the media fanfare that these flower generate is beyond me, through in two players that do nothing but run fast and tackle, and suddenly they have paceand playing finals? and the media believes it they are shit Amen Scott! We hear the same shit every flower year and every flower year the media swallow it like oysters washed down with chilled Chalbis. It's ridiculous the easy run they get. We've got pace - Russell, Simpson, Betts We've got exciting KPP players - JFK, Carlos We've got A DAMN SIGHT MORE YOUTH THAN THEM and still the Baby Bombers shit spews forth. Hate it hate it hate it hate it hate it. flower media eating out of the Essendon* hand. For flower's sake! I love both of you!

Author:	bluehammer [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:43 pm ]
Post subject:
Here are your replacements Michael ---\ Fletcher ----\ Hird -----------> Johns Lucas-------/ Lloyd------/ He's a 5 man football machine.

Author:	Crusader [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:03 pm ]
Post subject:
Don't discount Kepler Bradley so quickly. It was pretty clear that he got too big, too quick. Johns is garbage though... The attention on him allows Kepler to sneak under the radar.

Author:	rhys87 [ Thu Apr 12, 2007 5:23 pm ]
Post subject:
Crusader wrote: Don't discount Kepler Bradley so quickly. It was pretty clear that he got too big, too quick. if they try to make him the next Dustin Fletcher, like what they are doing at the moment he will end up shit. (Don't know why clubs try to do that)