Gibbs
| TalkingCarlton http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| Kennedy for Rising Star? http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=15404 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | acr [ Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Kennedy for Rising Star? |
Watching Danyle Pearce run around for Port yesterday I was prompted to look at the rules for the Rising Star. It occurred to me that he had been around for a while and I couldn't see how he could be considered in the same group as Murphy, Raines and Heath Shaw. It turns out that he played 7 games in 2005 before playing all 22 in 2006. The rules for the Rising star award state that the player has to be under 21 on 1 Jan of the year and have played less than 10 games (and not be suspended). Josh Kennedy played 9 games last year and was not nominated meaning he is eligible for the award this year. I reckon Kennedy might be worth a lazy couple of bucks for this award.... |
|
| Author: | TheGame [ Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Very hard for a key position player to win the award, save your money. |
|
| Author: | phoenix johnson [ Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
He'd be in with a shot, but last years crop of draftees and some one like Xavier Ellis will be very hard to beat. Boy, didn't Mitch Brown look impressive last night?! Good size about him, strong marking and very athletic. |
|
| Author: | acr [ Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thought the same thing about Brown. Strong, penetrating, accurate kick - very much the West Coast style. |
|
| Author: | Andain [ Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kennedy for Rising Star? |
acr wrote: Watching Danyle Pearce run around for Port yesterday I was prompted to look at the rules for the Rising Star. It occurred to me that he had been around for a while and I couldn't see how he could be considered in the same group as Murphy, Raines and Heath Shaw. It turns out that he played 7 games in 2005 before playing all 22 in 2006.
The rules for the Rising star award state that the player has to be under 21 on 1 Jan of the year and have played less than 10 games (and not be suspended). Josh Kennedy played 9 games last year and was not nominated meaning he is eligible for the award this year. I reckon Kennedy might be worth a lazy couple of bucks for this award.... If Gibbs doesn't step up straight away, I couldn't care less if he does or doesn't, Pendlebury will win it this year. |
|
| Author: | imitation_of_life [ Sun Apr 01, 2007 2:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
TheGame wrote: Very hard for a key position player to win the award, save your money.
didnt riewoldt take it out over judd a few years back? |
|
| Author: | The Spornstar [ Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
imitation_of_life wrote: TheGame wrote: Very hard for a key position player to win the award, save your money. didnt riewoldt take it out over judd a few years back? True, as did kozi the year before. |
|
| Author: | Deano Supremo [ Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I reckon Carrazzo's a chance |
|
| Author: | The Duke [ Sun Apr 01, 2007 9:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Gibbs
|
|
| Author: | Pickle [ Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Agree that the kid Mitch Brown looked very good in a high pressure game - he could be a chance for it... |
|
| Author: | Elwood Blues1 [ Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Agree on Mitch Brown......looked very capable and with his strong body reminded me of a young Glen Jakovich. Not much fanfare about him before the draft but he seems a ready made complete player.....to play so well in a high pressure game shows he has a bright future. |
|
| Author: | The Tyrant [ Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Gibbs should easily gain the 2047 votes he needs to win it |
|
| Author: | thehalford [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Deano Supremo wrote: I reckon Carrazzo's a chance
Is he eligible? |
|
| Author: | Drewgirl [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Stupid Ryder got it from Essendon*. Bullshit |
|
| Author: | true_blue3 [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
i think nathan jones from melbourne would be the favourite to take it out this year but i wouldn't write kennedy or gibbs off. |
|
| Author: | ryan2000 [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 2:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ryder got the nod apparently..............and fair enough too. |
|
| Author: | Andain [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm surprised he got one before Kennedy. |
|
| Author: | phoenix johnson [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Fevola wrote: Stupid Ryder got it from Essendon*. Bullshit
BULLSHIT! Softest bloke running around in the AFL at the moment. A gust of wind could blow past that bloke and he'd be having nightmares for a week. |
|
| Author: | kennyhunter [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
phoenix johnson wrote: Fevola wrote: Stupid Ryder got it from Essendon*. Bullshit BULLSHIT! Softest bloke running around in the AFL at the moment. A gust of wind could blow past that bloke and he'd be having nightmares for a week. Come on you blokes, that's the real No.1 draft pick, you're talking about ... |
|
| Author: | Andain [ Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
kennyhunter wrote: phoenix johnson wrote: Fevola wrote: Stupid Ryder got it from Essendon*. Bullshit BULLSHIT! Softest bloke running around in the AFL at the moment. A gust of wind could blow past that bloke and he'd be having nightmares for a week. Come on you blokes, that's the real No.1 draft pick, you're talking about ... 
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC + 10 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|