TalkingCarlton
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

New Blue Swann likely to tackle coach stand-off
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=15307		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  George Harris [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:29 am ]
Post subject:  New Blue Swann likely to tackle coach stand-off
http://www.realfooty.theage.com.au/real ... 79032.html
Author:  jimmae [ Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:23 am ]
Post subject: 
CEO cum mediator?

Doubtful - looks like Dick wants him to shake things up by talking contracts.
Author:  blueycarlton [ Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:14 am ]
Post subject: 
What Carlton via Swann should say to Pagan and Mitchell,

"We expect you to act like adults, to communicate and work together for the Carlton Football Club,
If you can't do that, then both of you will get the axe".
Author:  blueboy8 [ Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:39 am ]
Post subject: 
blueycarlton wrote:
What Carlton via Swann should say to Pagan and Mitchell,

"We expect you to act like adults, to communicate and work together for the Carlton Football Club,
If you can't do that, then both of you will get the axe".


And Pagan will reply with "show me the money"
Author:  AGRO [ Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:48 am ]
Post subject: 
blueboy8 wrote:
blueycarlton wrote:
What Carlton via Swann should say to Pagan and Mitchell,

"We expect you to act like adults, to communicate and work together for the Carlton Football Club,
If you can't do that, then both of you will get the axe".


And Pagan will reply with "show me the money"



Give them 3 written warnings and if no improvement - flower them off. :twisted:
Author:  Rocco Iguana [ Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:58 am ]
Post subject: 
blueboy8 wrote:
blueycarlton wrote:
What Carlton via Swann should say to Pagan and Mitchell,

"We expect you to act like adults, to communicate and work together for the Carlton Football Club,
If you can't do that, then both of you will get the axe".


And Pagan will reply with "show me the money"


With Pagan apparently secure for 2007 and irrespective of the rights or wrongs, the way I see it....Mitchell has to go ..is he really that important to the future that the club will continue to accept the current nonsense ??
Author:  AGRO [ Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:16 pm ]
Post subject: 
Rocco Iguana wrote:
With Pagan apparently secure for 2007 and irrespective of the rights or wrongs, the way I see it....Mitchell has to go ..is he really that important to the future that the club will continue to accept the current nonsense ??



I won't be having Collingwood's Acting CEO telling us how to run our club, we'll leave that to there immediate past CEO. :wink: :P :lol:
Author:  Rocco Iguana [ Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:30 pm ]
Post subject: 
AGRO wrote:
Rocco Iguana wrote:
With Pagan apparently secure for 2007 and irrespective of the rights or wrongs, the way I see it....Mitchell has to go ..is he really that important to the future that the club will continue to accept the current nonsense ??



I won't be having Collingwood's Acting CEO telling us how to run our club, we'll leave that to there immediate past CEO. :wink: :P :lol:


LOL
(for some reason my smilies aren't working, even though that option is on)
Author:  Indie [ Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:37 pm ]
Post subject: 
AGRO wrote:
blueboy8 wrote:
blueycarlton wrote:
What Carlton via Swann should say to Pagan and Mitchell,

"We expect you to act like adults, to communicate and work together for the Carlton Football Club,
If you can't do that, then both of you will get the axe".


And Pagan will reply with "show me the money"



Give them 3 written warnings and if no improvement - flower them off. :twisted:

That assumes that the club has the power to give such a direction to Pagan. I'm not too sure about that.
Author:  Big Kahuna Boot [ Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:25 pm ]
Post subject: 
..the old board was dodgey.. ..they lacked the guts to finish off pags.. ..they interviewed mitch and then flip-flopped.. ..it sux, but mitch now has to go.. ..he got screwed..now like anyone that gets reamed, he should leave.. ..it aint fair, but neither is life..
Author:  ryan2000 [ Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:29 pm ]
Post subject: 
Nope...............keep Mitchell.

For the past decade (with both North & Carlton), anybody who has a problem with Denis is moved on...........seems like the growing trend & the thing to do and the way i see it, the reason why there is such a positive feel around the club at the moment is because we have just broken the trend.

Something needs to be done yes..............but please don't move Mitchell on.
Author:  Big Kahuna Boot [ Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:33 pm ]
Post subject: 
..yeah i can understand why yer may feel sympathetic to mitch's plight, and i also understand that the old board let pags bend them over a barrel and now it's harder to shift the stubborn ol' bastiche'.. ..but the current situation is untenable, both have shown they're too immature to move on.. ..and quite frankly we're all about regaining our integrity..and while this continues we ain't gonna have any..i cant see pags getting the chop before season's end..so we either dump mitch, or this conts all season..
Author:  kaxsta [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:33 am ]
Post subject:  The Age: Blue review unlikely to get rid of Mitchell
Not sure if this has been posted before:

Blue review unlikely to get rid of Mitchell

Its from Caro so Im not sure how accurate it is... :wink:
Author:  George Harris [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:43 am ]
Post subject: 
UPDATE...

Swann to end feud

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/ ... 62,00.html



Blue review unlikely to get rid of Mitchell

http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/b ... 60428.html
Author:  jimmae [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:50 am ]
Post subject: 
Does anyone else feel that Swann turning the heat down on Pagan and Mitchell's dealings suggests that Mitchell applied for the head coaching role, rather than being requested to as he's publicly suggested?
Author:  billc3 [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:32 am ]
Post subject: 
Apparently in Caro's original article, this was written
Quote:
the Blues' new hierarchy has been buoyed by the club's encouraging start to the season which included a brilliant round 1 "come from behind" victory that the hapless Tigers could do nothing about, and influential sections of the Carlton board have made their thoughts on Mitchell clear to Swann



BUT the editor had to cut it back just to this

Quote:
the Blues' new hierarchy has been buoyed by the club's encouraging start to the season, and influential sections of the Carlton board have made their thoughts on Mitchell clear to Swann


No really, she was really going to mention the Tigers....



Funny how it's soooo easy to mention Carlton when referring to some other club going to pot though
8)
Author:  budzy [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:34 am ]
Post subject: 
jimmae wrote:
Does anyone else feel that Swann turning the heat down on Pagan and Mitchell's dealings suggests that Mitchell applied for the head coaching role, rather than being requested to as he's publicly suggested?

No.

The whole saga last September/October was an absolute farce with total responsibility being the CFC Boards at the time.
Author:  jimmae [ Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:08 pm ]
Post subject: 
budzy wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Does anyone else feel that Swann turning the heat down on Pagan and Mitchell's dealings suggests that Mitchell applied for the head coaching role, rather than being requested to as he's publicly suggested?

No.

The whole saga last September/October was an absolute farce with total responsibility being the CFC Boards at the time.

Then why would he further separate them, rather than pull their heads in and get them talking?
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/