jack_4 wrote:
I agree with a lot of the list, but I was say the following players are overrated:
3. Walker-- not quite their yet
7. Kennedy-- hopefully he can play at least 18 games this year
9. Bower-- similar to Kennedy, he is in our best 22 but still needs to cement his spot
11. Waite-- Didn't have a great 2006, must improve
22. Cloke
32. Jacobs
Underrated:
6. Stevens
10. Scotland
15. Whitnall
27. Houlihan
31. Carazzo-- he is in our best 22
34. Bannister-- I agree, he needs to cement his spot, but I would have him slightly higher, I think he is just outside making the firsts
36. McLaren
39. Austin
Yep agree with all of that.
I understand that people want to push up the young blokes but as a result I think we sometimes tend to overrate their current important slightly. I would even suggest that Murphy hasn't done enough as yet to be the number two ranked player on our list; maybe he will have in two years' time, but not now. Same with Walker, top 7-8 maybe but not 3rd. Kennedy hasn't really done anything yet so not sure how he can be ranked 7th. Same with Bower, yes he made a reasonable start to his AFL career but he's only played two games and if we don't have more than 8 players better than him then we are in more trouble than we think!
Scotland was IMO our best and certainly most consistent performer last season and overall has been great since he came to Carlton so based on this he'd be in my top 5. Stevens is interesting, didn't have a great season but if you were ranking our list I think he'd still deserve to at least be top 5 and top 3 when in form. Whitnall at 15 I'm sorry but can't work that out, if there are 14 blokes on our list better than Lance than maybe we're actually better off than I thought! I know Lance is not universally loved and appreciate again that we want to promote the young blokes but that is unrealistic. Houlihan deserves better than to be 27th and Carrazzo despite some obviously flaws still commands a regular game and genuinely does quite well so 31 is a bit harsh for a bloke who plays every week!
Otherwise I generally agree, as I've said I just think there is a tendency to overrate the younger players somewhat which is not necessarily a bad thing but still produces unrealistic rankings if you're ranking a list based on CURRENT times. But if you change the criteria to something like where you think players might be ranked in two years time then it's maybe a more realistic assessment.