TalkingCarlton
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/

Is the Kernahan speech available? (Yes)
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12512
Page 1 of 4

Author:  AIRCAV [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:30 am ]
Post subject:  Is the Kernahan speech available? (Yes)

Has anyone got a link to the actual speech or a transcript?

Author:  bluehammer [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:24 am ]
Post subject: 

Some 'highlights'

Sorry for the aspect ratio, I don't think it really matters though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxtTEf6ABQg

Author:  bluesouth [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:52 am ]
Post subject: 

Link doesn't work bluehammer

Author:  bluehammer [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:56 am ]
Post subject: 

Does now. sorry about that

Author:  Synbad [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:07 am ]
Post subject: 

As i wrote elsewhere.. Smorgon and Kernahan had better set up a round table meeting with the media and work on remedy from all this all we wont be able to look at a paper for years...
@#$%&! Bozos!!

Author:  bluehammer [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:10 am ]
Post subject: 

"Geee it's hard for us to attract sponsors, what we really need is the media to get behind our brand"

Author:  George Harris [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:11 am ]
Post subject: 

Embarrassing.

Sticks should stick his head somewhere besides his own arse.

Author:  budzy [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:12 am ]
Post subject: 

My old man taught me to 'never burn ya bridges son'....

Author:  The Shag [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:39 am ]
Post subject: 

that was @#$%&! fantastic!

Author:  Synbad [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:53 am ]
Post subject: 

The Shag wrote:
that was F@%&#! fantastic!


Well Shag.. youre kind of the supporter that that speech was engineered to inspire...

Author:  bluehammer [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 11:03 am ]
Post subject: 

Synbad wrote:
The Shag wrote:
that was F@%&#! fantastic!


Well Shag.. youre kind of the supporter that that speech was engineered to inspire...


Curse the swear filter.

I'm sure shag was being sarcastic:

"That was f#cked! Fantastic"

Author:  Lace Out [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 11:17 am ]
Post subject: 

Whe that day comes, we are Carlton @#$%&! the rest!!!!

Sticks for President... 8)

Author:  George Harris [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 11:21 am ]
Post subject: 

Very Elliot-esque of Sticks.


Maybe he should have said:

We are Carlton - a bunch of bumbling incompetants - and we don't need to @#$%&! the rest as we are quite capable of fuck-ing ourselves over - again and again.

Author:  Macfart [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 11:33 am ]
Post subject: 

Sticks Vs The Media

I wonder who is going to win this one ?

Kernahan champion player, as a board member though he is an idiot

Author:  dane [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 11:40 am ]
Post subject: 

Firearm Fevs wrote:
Whe that day comes, we are Carlton F@%&#! the rest!!!!

Sticks for President... 8)


Go Sticks @#$%&! the Media.
I'm gunna love it when we come good and stick it to them all.
Given theres alot of issues and we have a long way to go but we will be back. Please rich supporters pay the AFL back the 1.5 million and tell the AFL to get [REDACTED].

Author:  Lace Out [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 11:50 am ]
Post subject: 

I can't wait for the day when we can start giving it back to everyone.

They have prayed on our carcass for too long!!!


That stick speech although risky, gave me the feel of the old powerful Carlton which i miss dearly.

Author:  dane [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:01 pm ]
Post subject: 

I reackon we desperately miss our Carlton arrogance. We need as much as possible. Carlton of old.

Author:  bluehammer [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:04 pm ]
Post subject: 

Risky? It was stupid and unprofessional

Why do companies invest in sponsorships? To get exposure for their product. Positive exposure. They do it to have a positive association with a 'brand' that is in the public eye. Like a football club.

Now that Sticks has proceeded to alienate, rightly or wrongly, the media frontrunners for no other reason than a bit of oneupmanship, who is going to rush to be associated with our football club, knowing that there will be no Eddie style free kicks for sponsors through a good media relationship?

It was unprofessional.

He attack Patrick Smith for 'having no friends', Jake Niall for 'wanting Caro's job' and Mark Robinson for being a 'portly rotund Essendonian'. Hardly the basis for a well thought out argument no matter how true.

He lost himself credibility as a board member and club leader, credibility that on the field was never questioned.

I've no doubt he thinks he's doing it for the good of the club, but with a couple less crownies in him, would he assess what he said and think again?

We have to ask ourselves, after 7 days of board wrangling, is the club in a better state than it was 7 days ago? I'd suggest that's an emphatic NO.

The club gained absolutely nothing positive from Sticks' tirade on Friday night. Not a thing. He got a cheer from a bunch of people who had all paid to be at the night and will sign up regardless next year. Preaching to the converted. As rousing as his '@#$%&! all the rest' signoff was, it's done nothing to convince those who weren't already believers that we're heading in the right direction.

Misguided, damaging, and dare I say, childish

Author:  dane [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:04 pm ]
Post subject: 

bluehammer wrote:
Risky? It was stupid and unprofessional

Why do companies invest in sponsorships? To get exposure for their product. Positive exposure. They do it to have a positive association with a 'brand' that is in the public eye. Like a football club.

Now that Sticks has proceeded to alienate, rightly or wrongly, the media frontrunners for no other reason than a bit of oneupmanship, who is going to rush to be associated with our football club, knowing that there will be no Eddie style free kicks for sponsors through a good media relationship?

It was unprofessional.

He attack Patrick Smith for 'having no friends', Jake Niall for 'wanting Caro's job' and Mark Robinson for being a 'portly rotund Essendonian'. Hardly the basis for a well thought out argument no matter how true.

He lost himself credibility as a board member and club leader, credibility that on the field was never questioned.

I've no doubt he thinks he's doing it for the good of the club, but with a couple less crownies in him, would he assess what he said and think again?

We have to ask ourselves, after 7 days of board wrangling, is the club in a better state than it was 7 days ago? I'd suggest that's an emphatic NO.

The club gained absolutely nothing positive from Sticks' tirade on Friday night. Not a thing. He got a cheer from a bunch of people who had all paid to be at the night and will sign up regardless next year. Preaching to the converted. As rousing as his 'F@%&#! all the rest' signoff was, it's done nothing to convince those who weren't already believers that we're heading in the right direction.

Misguided, damaging, and dare I say, childish


well you are no fun 8)

Author:  JohnM [ Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

That speech would've been great if it was an ex-player, say someone like a Jimmy Buckley... with no official capacity at the club. A bit of a laugh, get the room fired up, preach to the converted.

But it came from our Vice President and a member of the board of directors.

Pie-night at the local footy club stuff.

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC + 10 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/