Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 2:40 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:24 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..surprised regarding Doogs, was excellent in his first season, injury interrupted this year and some positional changes too..

..McKay when talking about our talls recently, again had Hendo down back.. ..thing is if Waite gets injured again next season we're once again without any real KPFs except for Hammer, a ruck learning to play deep fwd and Levi, a very raw developing kid..

..admiitedly, not so crash hot down back either.. ..Jamo's just as likely to be injured as Waite is up fwd, so i guess the club feels [panics] that Hendo is a must down back.. ..other talls in reserve are Watto [macca didnt mention his name when he rattled off our talls], and White.. ..McCarthy is still very raw, and McInnes showed plenty but still LTI..

..losing Bower and Thornton is height and experience out of a side that is light-on for experienced talls.. ..i'm surprised that the players we've had to let go are talls, when we're not so blessed with talls in their prime.. .Thornton especially ought to have been retained, solid and dependable and reliable, and decent at either end..

..a few injuries to our talls next year and we're 'developing/rebuilding' talls again..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 9:32 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Duigan is what, 28?

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 9:48 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
harker wrote:
Duigan & Collins aren't completely safe just yet.
If some good deals come our way and we can't trade out other guys then they may just be in some trouble.

It will all depend on the quality of what may yet come our way.


I'd suggest that Collins and Duigan would already be contracted, without the club announcing it, rather than unsigned with the club waiting and seeing.
Same with Watson, McInnes, Squidda, Patty Mac, Curnow etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:03 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:30 pm
Posts: 2897
My eyes deceive me regarding Davies. The guy went from bad to worse (maybe worst) this season in the 2 opportunities he was given. If you don't recall, go read the Post Match discussions for the Richmond and Sydney games in which he played. He was rubbish. Here's some highlights:

v Sydney:
"Davies struggles horribly. I hate to write him off, but I wouldn't be too phased if I never saw him on the field again in the navy blue."

"Touhy was ordinary and Davies was horrible IMHO when he came on."

"1- The Selection of Davies ahead of Thornton was Rubbish. Not only Davies ended up being the Sub but when he came on, he made Some Critical errors in Defense which Gifted Sydney 2 Easy Goals. Doesnt look an AFL Standard Player. "

"Which of his changers impressed you the most?"

vs Richmond:

"Davies should never have been selected."

"Richmond targeting Davies. Bloody obvious, open ur eyes ratten"

"luke livingston is a better fu#%en option than davies atm... im not kidding"

"Richmond know that when you isolate Davies in defence you get shots on goal. What a liability."

"davies is awful"

Unless MM somehow waves a magic wand and reinvigorates him, throw him on the pile as a guy who just isn't up to the grade required.

Sorry, but that's the truth.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:07 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Personally, I am happy we are selective with our trading. I don't see caddy for pick 11 & a player as great value. Gumbleton for 30s is hugely risky? However, we should be selecting 4 in the draft at least.

Malthouse is our million dollar recruit. The positive about next year is that the results will be a fair comparison with last year, as there won't be star playing recruits to make the coach look good


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:30 pm
Posts: 2897
-injuries
-ratten's single gameplan
+malthouse's greater coaching prowess
+attitude and willingness to win contested footy
+somebody command the forward line
=finals, possibly top 4


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:02 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:54 pm
Posts: 313
Location: A Simmo chip pass from Glenferrie Oval
Blue Vain wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
The same Brock McLean who averaged more contested possessions and more clearances than Mitch Robinson this year? :lol:
In fact he averaged the 4th highest amount of contested possessions and clearances at the club.

Good research on your behalf!



Yep beaten by Judd, Murphy and Carrazzo... perhaps its a reflection on the amount of time spent in the centre square and at stoppages compared to the rest of the list (Brock played 1 more game than Carrazzo). Brock's averages were inflated by his huge numbers in the St.Kilda game (by .5). The other three also have other facets to their game... Tom Bell spent less time in the centre square and yet almost had the same clearance ave as Brock... not bad for a rookie!!

How often was Mitch in the centre square/playing in the midfield? A bit difficult when he spent a considerable amount of time as a defensive forward!!

Good research on your behalf :grin:


Assertions and baseless statements mean jack shite. Do you have any data on Brocks midfield time compared to anyone else?
Nah, didnt think so.
Brock spent plenty of his time parked on the half forward flank. Some of you just need to get over it. McLean had a fantastic second half of the season and deserves his contract extention fully.

And by the way, you dont need to play midfield to win contested possessions. And tell me, how does playing 1 more game than Carrazzo effect averages? :lol:

Nice try anyway.

Agreed

If anyone out there didnt have the hair on the back of their neck standing up when he kicked the winner against Richmond, they are emotionally crippled.

Excellent season from McLean. Just hope he doesnt do a Russell - but I dont think he will


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:53 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:30 pm
Posts: 83
teknodeejay wrote:
My eyes deceive me regarding Davies. The guy went from bad to worse (maybe worst) this season in the 2 opportunities he was given. If you don't recall, go read the Post Match discussions for the Richmond and Sydney games in which he played. He was rubbish. Here's some highlights:

v Sydney:
"Davies struggles horribly. I hate to write him off, but I wouldn't be too phased if I never saw him on the field again in the navy blue."

"Touhy was ordinary and Davies was horrible IMHO when he came on."

"1- The Selection of Davies ahead of Thornton was Rubbish. Not only Davies ended up being the Sub but when he came on, he made Some Critical errors in Defense which Gifted Sydney 2 Easy Goals. Doesnt look an AFL Standard Player. "

"Which of his changers impressed you the most?"

vs Richmond:

"Davies should never have been selected."

"Richmond targeting Davies. Bloody obvious, open ur eyes ratten"

"luke livingston is a better fu#%en option than davies atm... im not kidding"

"Richmond know that when you isolate Davies in defence you get shots on goal. What a liability."

"davies is awful"

Unless MM somehow waves a magic wand and reinvigorates him, throw him on the pile as a guy who just isn't up to the grade required.

Sorry, but that's the truth.

If he is delisted next year, I hope the person or people responsible for giving him another year accompany him out the door. In my opinion, he hasn't done anything to deserve being signed until the end of 2013.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:28 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:46 pm
Posts: 832
I think those people are already out the door Blueman.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:04 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
jimmae wrote:
The rule is actually that you can only retain 3 first year rookies at a time, and one second year rookie. So yes, the full compliment is 4 in terms of registered footballers.

Internationals operate off that list technically, with a maximum of two per year and a three year contract. Non-registered footballers I think count against the last, but are simply added at a list lodgement rather than drafted.

The exact details are quite hazy on all of this because the rules do change (often without announcement) and the records of these are not shown publicly for digestion. Must be some sort of book handed out to agents and clubs.


The rules have changed from being allowed to have 6 (now called) Category A rookies, or 8 if you have not Veterans (like us this year) to 4.

So we are going to have 5 off the rookie list Tuohy, Curnow, Casboult elevated, Heyne and Carter delisted, and 1 rookie pick.

This does not apply to Irish and Internationals. I'm not sure what the go is with Zone selections (eg Bray and Lodge).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:13 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
Blue Vain wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
The same Brock McLean who averaged more contested possessions and more clearances than Mitch Robinson this year? :lol:
In fact he averaged the 4th highest amount of contested possessions and clearances at the club.

Good research on your behalf!



Yep beaten by Judd, Murphy and Carrazzo... perhaps its a reflection on the amount of time spent in the centre square and at stoppages compared to the rest of the list (Brock played 1 more game than Carrazzo). Brock's averages were inflated by his huge numbers in the St.Kilda game (by .5). The other three also have other facets to their game... Tom Bell spent less time in the centre square and yet almost had the same clearance ave as Brock... not bad for a rookie!!

How often was Mitch in the centre square/playing in the midfield? A bit difficult when he spent a considerable amount of time as a defensive forward!!

Good research on your behalf :grin:


Assertions and baseless statements mean jack shite. Do you have any data on Brocks midfield time compared to anyone else?
Nah, didnt think so.
Brock spent plenty of his time parked on the half forward flank. Some of you just need to get over it. McLean had a fantastic second half of the season and deserves his contract extention fully.

And by the way, you dont need to play midfield to win contested possessions. And tell me, how does playing 1 more game than Carrazzo effect averages? :lol:

Nice try anyway.



Did Brock kick plenty of goals?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:33 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17495
Location: Left Cuckistan
NYTDOG has a new alias I see.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:39 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
Michael Jezz wrote:
Personally, I am happy we are selective with our trading. I don't see caddy for pick 11 & a player as great value.



I was in total accordance with this thought until Geelong swooped in and used their compensation pick to snare him. If their recruiting guru Stephen Wells rates him highly enough to thrown that as a trade, then he's obviously quality. I dont rate anyone else more highly in the AFL recruiting circles. His strike rate with drafting kids is spot on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:04 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
A significant part of Geelong going after Caddy was need, in terms of him as a player but also as somebody able to go straight into the midfield right now to help out Selwood.
Some of their aging stars aren't up to being in the midfield any more.

And, as that compo pick can't be used this year, it is of more worth to GC than to the Cats


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:47 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 3458
If GWS really wants Warnock, then what's a fair price?

Pick #12?
Pick #3 (throw in Bower, Thornton, Ellard, Russell and Curnow)?*

If they come sniffing do we play hard-ball, or look to profit from him?



(*this is not a serious suggestion, btw.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:04 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:30 pm
Posts: 2897
If it ends up being a straight swap Warnock for Dawes, that's not a bad outcome regardless of the route. Warnock isn't a top 10 pick (heck, he's probably not a first round), but who cares what goes Collingwood's way if the result is 1 expendable player out, and 1 wanted player in?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:11 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
teknodeejay wrote:
If it ends up being a straight swap Warnock for Dawes, that's not a bad outcome regardless of the route. Warnock isn't a top 10 pick (heck, he's probably not a first round), but who cares what goes Collingwood's way if the result is 1 expendable player out, and 1 wanted player in?


It is actually. It is a terrible outcome.
The Pies desperately need a player like Warnock, because Jolly is nearly done.
We don't even want Dawes.

Why would we do a deal that weakens our list, and makes the Filth's stronger?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:52 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
If it is just a straight swap (i.e. no component of salary paid at our end), I'd say it's favourable, but only just. Gain some much needed salary cap space, on the other hand - Casboult, Dawes and Waite? :S

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 2:22 pm 
Offline
formerly Blue Boots

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 12:18 am
Posts: 1901
At least if we get another key forward it actually allows Waite to play more of a flanking role. I think we can fit in Waite and another 2 forwards...might actually be even better.

_________________
Essendon-Only team to have ever been found guilty of salary cap breaches in a premiership year!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 2:22 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Throwing shit at the wall here...

Warnock to GWS
Dawes to Carlton
Giles to Crows
Adelaide's pick they get for Tippett (20 something?) to Pies

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group