Sidefx wrote:
club29 wrote:
Lets not forget they get 5goals down frequently and yesterday were scoring a goal once every 7 fwd 50 entry up until 3qtr time. Play one good quarter alot but it usually happens to be the last. When we played one good quarter last year and still won we got on our teams case and in the end aadjusted our gameplan and probably overcorrected.
I like the idea of going all out attack for a few weeks even if it costs us 8pts. Then roll it back and hopefully find some middle ground at a time when we get players returning.
Our real major problem is leg speed. They Pies have loads of running power. Yesterday their running power , long bombs and chaos entries in the last helped them overcome the Bombers.. and every touch the Diacos two get is worth about 3 of a Carlton touch.
100%
And another two of those players, Steele and Pendles are mature, smart, damaging players.
A refreshing perspective on the situation amongst the pitch forks herd mentality on here lately.
They have a good spread of talent on their list as well as depth.
I also find it amusing not less than 2 years ago the same herd were saying Teague's game plan was too complex and the players couldn't cope.
Voss comes in and simplifies it and we start winning, now it is not creative, daring, tactical or dare I say "complex" enough.
Yet, McFly's plan works because it is simple...........I'm confused.
The issue is cattle to facilitate the plan and structure as it is being developed.
Do we need to have a more controlled playing style to be able to control the tempo and ultimately make and win finals? 100%
Do we have the players able to effectively do the above plan? With an injury free list (or non injured key personnel to implement) yes.
So if the players needed to play the new plan that has been worked on all summer are not available, then how can we effectively do that?
As I said in the after game thread, the only thing we could've tried was an undermanned F50 with a defensive wall to keep the ball locked in as long as we could.
Or go back to the rush forward at all costs like last season and risk getting smashed on the rebound (which for me was too risky given the personnel shortage).
I watched the intra club game in the preseason, and the dare and the speed we moved the ball from the backline was the best I have seen in decades. That was when Williams and Saady were the HB's. Doc wasnt needed. It was truly a revelation. Those 2 players alone showed their wares in round 22 and 23 last year, and we all know we didn't lose those games in defence. My heart sank when Williams did his ACL.
If our 3 Big Forwards would kick straight (ie take a professional approach to kicking at goal with the same process every time) we would have won those 2 games vs Coll and Melb, and beaten Saints on the weekend.
Docherty Saad and Williams make a HUGE difference to our running game, even without Boyd.
Remember Martin, Cottrell and Marchbank in round 22 & 23? They provided plenty of speed and link from defence to forwardline too. Pity we have put our faith in too many injury prone players. Hey, they may come good in the next month. They've been out for so long, they must have been rebuilt...bionics?
I think we still have time to get our best players back to make an impact and make finals.