Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 03, 2025 9:00 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1808 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 ... 91  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:44 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
The_Wookie wrote:
Freddy47 wrote:

This years membership numbers:
Carlton - 45,800
Richmond - 53,027

Whose responsible?


Ah yeah but check the revenue figures on that and it tells a different story. Close to 9 million for the Blues, just over 5 million for the Tigers. We flogged them for revenue 46 million to 37 million - and they included the 6 million from the Fighting Tiger Fund. Without the fund they go under by 3 million. Remember that. Maybe the Blues need a big fundraiser.


As i have too much time on my hands, feast your vile jellies on this and tell me the board is doing a bad job, and try to do it with a straight face:

Image

I defy anyone to look at the figures from 2008 on (when Sticks took over) and tell me The Skipper and the board arent on the right track.

These annual reports are all bundled neatly into a zip file for your delectation and can be retrieved ay http://www.worldofwookie.com/carlton/carltonreports.rar.


This is no place for facts Wook.

I mean Sticks should just @#*£ right off because some anonymous bananas who couldn't draw a football said so. There's absolutely no reason we should show him the slightest respect or gratitude because these guys could do a much better job.

I mean all you have to do is ask them.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:47 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Our reliance on gaming revenue has tripled in two years :cry:

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:49 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18604
Location: threeohfivethree
Thanks Wookie.

All interesting.

I'm curious about the shift from 2009 to 2012. Revenue is up 12.5 million but profit goes from 8.6 million to a 700K loss.

Where'd it go? What were the extra expenses that led to that?

How did we make 8.6 million dollars on 34 million revenue and yet make a loss on 46 million dollars revenue? Footy department spending including payouts is only up 4 million in that time.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:56 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Errr we do have fund raises... and handouts from benefactors as well.

Actually.... can you tell us apart from what " the apathetic supporters " raise..

What our corporate sponsorship is???

Also what the AFL sharing from things like TV rights are.. and how do we compare with the other clubs??

Yes we have a large supporter base.. (That was there before Sticks even heard of the CFC).. and we have benefactors...

Aside from all that.... what has Sticks/Swann etc brought in off their own bats???


and where do we sit on the financial table overall as compared to the other clubs.....???

Thats what you should be showing us...

I reckon every clubs figures and turnover have gone up in the last 5 years... yes even Norths.. ..

In isolation wookie... that table says nothing.....

And thats not evidence in itself for anything...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:01 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Oh i mean corporate sponsorship compared to other clubs...

in case youre misunderstanding.

Perspective and context.

The way i am reading things ... our biggest money spinner growth has been the pokies..

So we give Sticks credit for that do we???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:04 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
GWS wrote:
Thanks Wookie.

All interesting.

I'm curious about the shift from 2009 to 2012. Revenue is up 12.5 million but profit goes from 8.6 million to a 700K loss.

Where'd it go? What were the extra expenses that led to that?

How did we make 8.6 million dollars on 34 million revenue and yet make a loss on 46 million dollars revenue? Footy department spending including payouts is only up 4 million in that time.


Im not going to look back on the annual report, but there was a substantial increase in marketing spend.

I AM CARLTON campaign
Social Media
Google Hangout

All of that stuff costs money, the benefit of which won't be seen this year but in coming years.

Making a profit or loss isn't the be all and end all for a football club. People are too hung up on the result for this year. We had a poor year on field, attendances down by 7k as a result so you have to expect revenues to be down. You can say the board are partly responsible for the poor on field result which is fair enough, but they'd have been budgeting and basing their spend on a successful season.

Hopefully they've taken the steps to rectify the on field result, we'll finish top 4 in 2013 and make a big profit as a result.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:06 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
The disappointing figure in The Wookie's chart is the membership figure.

If you want to hang the board for something, thats a good place to start.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:16 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
TruBlueBrad wrote:
The disappointing figure in The Wookie's chart is the membership figure.

If you want to hang the board for something, that's a good place to start.


And they would probably point to the on-field performance.

I reckon if we are on track for top 4 by mid season (with some stronger performances against teams like the Hawks for example) we'll smash through 50k.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:25 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
TruBlueBrad wrote:
The disappointing figure in The Wookie's chart is the membership figure.

If you want to hang the board for something, thats a good place to start.

Wait!!!

How do the figures compare against the other teams.

How do you know whats disappointing or not?

Say you didnt know that other clubs can have up to 70,000 members.. and many over 50,000 you wouldnt be disapointed with our membership figures also right???

Its just that we pay more attention to those figures we hear about.

Again... our biggest money spinner has come from pokies... and thats not cos of Sticks...

Now where do we lie over all on the sectors Sticks can control???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:49 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
TruBlueBrad wrote:
GWS wrote:
Thanks Wookie.

All interesting.

I'm curious about the shift from 2009 to 2012. Revenue is up 12.5 million but profit goes from 8.6 million to a 700K loss.

Where'd it go? What were the extra expenses that led to that?

How did we make 8.6 million dollars on 34 million revenue and yet make a loss on 46 million dollars revenue? Footy department spending including payouts is only up 4 million in that time.


Im not going to look back on the annual report, but there was a substantial increase in marketing spend.

I AM CARLTON campaign
Social Media
Google Hangout

All of that stuff costs money, the benefit of which won't be seen this year but in coming years.

Making a profit or loss isn't the be all and end all for a football club. People are too hung up on the result for this year. We had a poor year on field, attendances down by 7k as a result so you have to expect revenues to be down. You can say the board are partly responsible for the poor on field result which is fair enough, but they'd have been budgeting and basing their spend on a successful season.

Hopefully they've taken the steps to rectify the on field result, we'll finish top 4 in 2013 and make a big profit as a result.


Renovations of Princes Park would also take a fair chunk out of it as well, I'd assume.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:00 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 572
If I want to measure CFC commercial and financial performance, and thus gauge the performance of the board. I would benchmark against Pies and Hawks, the pace setters not middle of the road teams or those at the bottom. If benchmark is Port Adelaide or Bulldogs the boards performance is going to look stellar.

_________________
Scott, things aren't as happy as they used to be down here at the unemployment office. Joblessness is no longer just for Philosophy majors - useful people are starting to feel the pinch.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:15 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
The disappointing figure in The Wookie's chart is the membership figure.

If you want to hang the board for something, thats a good place to start.

Wait!!!

How do the figures compare against the other teams.

How do you know whats disappointing or not?

Say you didnt know that other clubs can have up to 70,000 members.. and many over 50,000 you wouldnt be disapointed with our membership figures also right???

Its just that we pay more attention to those figures we hear about.

Again... our biggest money spinner has come from pokies... and thats not cos of Sticks...

Now where do we lie over all on the sectors Sticks can control???


Well I had just addressed the other factors the board has influence over, but sure lets ignore all of that and concentrate just on Sticks.

In that case, Im not sure why you quoted my post.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:25 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Sticks is president of our board
I board guides the football cllub towards a certain direction.

You said the "only sector youre disappointed with is the membership...
Wookie gave us some figures but he never put them into any kind of context,

I want them in a REAL context to decide whether i am satisfied or not....

Ultimately where we are as a club should be copared to other clubs.

And keep in mind we should be one of the biggest clubs.... so we should compare ourseves with the bigger clubs.



Dont underestimate the role a president has at a footy club.......

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:54 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
I didn't say membership figures were the only aspect I was disappointed in.

I said people are too hung up on the result from this year, which is true.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
TruBlueBrad wrote:
I didn't say membership figures were the only aspect I was disappointed in.

I said people are too hung up on the result from this year, which is true.

Whatabout the choice of having Ratten coach and half way through the year looking around at sacking him and paying him out?
Thats just for starters.....
That decision was consumated last year not this year... the sacking was this year ...

And its not just about the season... its more about where we used to be and where were at now.

Are we making up any ground???

I think people are looking at last season and chalking it up to a once off disaster......
Thats what an ostrich would think....


This club is in the average basket...!!!...thats all i see...!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:49 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
I dont think I've really disagreed with any of that.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18604
Location: threeohfivethree
The Rhino wrote:
Renovations of Princes Park would also take a fair chunk out of it as well, I'd assume.


The bulk of that would be assets rather than expenses that would be written off over the following years and wouldn't show up on the P&L.

You can see the assets have risen significantly (5.7 million) which would probably account for the renovation spending.

Still love to know what the actual expenses are.

Anyone got a copy of the last two years reports and can provide a list of where it all went?

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:41 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
you won't get real change while the current family ownership remains in control


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:45 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:52 am
Posts: 1197
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
The disappointing figure in The Wookie's chart is the membership figure.

If you want to hang the board for something, thats a good place to start.

Wait!!!

How do the figures compare against the other teams.

How do you know whats disappointing or not?

Say you didnt know that other clubs can have up to 70,000 members.. and many over 50,000 you wouldnt be disapointed with our membership figures also right???

Its just that we pay more attention to those figures we hear about.

Again... our biggest money spinner has come from pokies... and thats not cos of Sticks...

Now where do we lie over all on the sectors Sticks can control???


If you dont know the answers to these questions - I see Richmond cited on this forum a bit and thats a laugh and a half on direct comparison alone - then what the hell are you criticising for? Get out there and do some research of your own. What would I know, Ive only done club by club comparisons since 2009. The only reason that table exists is because im going through alll the clubs to do the same thing eventually.

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/Navyblue95 -
my youtube channel tracking carlton news on television and paytv


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 4:54 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
The_Wookie wrote:
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
The disappointing figure in The Wookie's chart is the membership figure.

If you want to hang the board for something, thats a good place to start.

Wait!!!

How do the figures compare against the other teams.

How do you know whats disappointing or not?

Say you didnt know that other clubs can have up to 70,000 members.. and many over 50,000 you wouldnt be disapointed with our membership figures also right???

Its just that we pay more attention to those figures we hear about.

Again... our biggest money spinner has come from pokies... and thats not cos of Sticks...

Now where do we lie over all on the sectors Sticks can control???


If you dont know the answers to these questions - I see Richmond cited on this forum a bit and thats a laugh and a half on direct comparison alone - then what the hell are you criticising for? Get out there and do some research of your own. What would I know, Ive only done club by club comparisons since 2009. The only reason that table exists is because im going through alll the clubs to do the same thing eventually.


Sorry to touch a raw nerve there Wookie ol boy... but i would have thought.. if you pull an ace out of your sleeve as some kind of meaningful argument... youd put the whole thing in its entire perspective or not worry about it.

You cant make an argument on figures in isolation.... its just not on .

Now m not asking you to do extra homework... im asking you .. if you wanna do some.. to do it properly....or not at all....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1808 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 ... 91  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group