Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 3:41 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1632 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 ... 82  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:27 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14940
A bit more from ericpascoe.
Thinks Gorringe, Sheehan and Galluci will be gone this week.
Graham and Simpson will get a contract.
Thomas offered a year.
Buckley and Boekhorst will depend on trade week/salary cap.
Casboult, contract on table-if he gets a better offer then bye bye.
Smedts, unknown.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 3:59 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2129
Haven't been on the site all year, but had to vent regarding Dale Thomas.

If they re-sign Thomas you know the club is on a road to nowhere. I don't care about how good he is at "mentoring players". He is paid to play, and let's face facts for most of the year he was one of the club's bottom 4 or 6 players, yet still got a game.

He's played 4 years at Carlton at approx. 700k per year. ...when the market rate for him (with injuries) was no more than 500k (probably closer to 400k) (Whoever hired Thomas should never be allowed back in the club).

His output is average at best (never averaged more than 20 possessions a season per game).

So based on his output he would be a 400 k player at best based on market value, so he has been paid 300k x 4 over the market rate= 1.2 million.

They made a mistake. Thomas may be nicer than everyone - Jobe Watson included- but it doesn't change the facts that the club erred in recruiting him. He got his premiership with Collingwood. Time to move on.


Last edited by tap in 79 on Tue Aug 29, 2017 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 4:00 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48542
Location: Prison Island
Getting rid of KJ is a dumb move

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 4:05 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24735
Location: Bondi Beach
The Normal One wrote:
jamespul65 wrote:
i follow the nfl and with there systems of drafting /recruiting, they would use a player like PLOWMAN to get picks or trade to get what is required for the club to make the team better. Lp his 22yrs ,190 odd cm.2 3 yrs experience, maybe a club might bite. I know people like plowman my friends included but i have seen times in games where he doesnt cut it , so if we trade if now we might get value / or he stays and becomes a good player either way we all WIN.


I've seen 22 players who don't cut it at times play for Carlton, including Cripps.

What they the other 99% of time is AFL standard.


:thumbsup: :clap:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 4:10 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24735
Location: Bondi Beach
grrofunger wrote:
Getting rid of KJ is a dumb move


Why wasn't he selected to play for the last 3 years?

Something wrong with that. I don't think its the club.

I too hoped he would be kept for his potential.
Obviously there was no potential to improve in the areas of concern.

I saw him give Waite a bath over at Spotless 4 years ago.
Potential was there.

He came back home where his mates were......

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 4:13 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:35 pm
Posts: 1234
tap in 79 wrote:
Haven't been on the site all year, but had to vent regarding Dale Thomas.

If they re-sign Thomas you know the club is on a road to nowhere. I don't care about how good he is at "mentoring players". He is paid to play, and let's face facts for most of the year he was one of the club's bottom 4 or 6 players, yet still got a game.

He's played 4 years at Carlton at approx. 700k per year. ...when the market rate for him (with injuries) was no more than 500k (probably closer to 400k) (Whoever hired Thomas should never be allowed back in the club).

His output is average at best (never averaged more than 20 possessions a season per game).

So based on his output he would be a 400 k player at best based on market value, so he has been paid 300k x 4 over the market rate= 1.2 million.

They made a mistake. Thomas may be nicer than everyone - Jobe Watson included- but it doesn't change the facts that the club erred in recruiting him.


Whilst I'm not a big Daisy fan and its clearly been of many poor recruiting decision, I wouldn't be adverse to giving him another year. You're getting caught up with his previous salary. I don't think the fact he was overpaid in the past really comes in to consideration when deciding whether he gets another contract. I think we could delist the 10 worst performing players on the list and Thomas would probably survive that cull.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 4:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17892
I agree that Daisy's previous contract shouldn't be a factor.
I would give him a year.
I would not give Nick Graham another contract. His best is still not great. Sadly, the same for Dylan Buckley. Just hasn't progressed enough in his time at Carlton.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 5:04 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2129
Blue Boys wrote:
tap in 79 wrote:
.


Whilst I'm not a big Daisy fan and its clearly been of many poor recruiting decision, I wouldn't be adverse to giving him another year. You're getting caught up with his previous salary. I don't think the fact he was overpaid in the past really comes in to consideration when deciding whether he gets another contract. I think we could delist the 10 worst performing players on the list and Thomas would probably survive that cull.


You are right, I am very much caught up in his previous salary. It saddens me that Carlton is a laughing stock, and it is because of decisions such as that one to hire Thomas. It is like offering $90,000 for a car that no one else in the market was willing to pay more than $30,000.

I understand errors with recruiting, it happens all the time, but this was on a bizarre level. Even a half-brain dead and semi-comotosed, drunk monkey with vision impairment couldn't make a decision that bad.

It is one of the main reasons why I rarely watch Carlton matches anymore.


Boekhorst got 26 possessions against Hawthorn- more than in any of Thomas's 18 games for the season...but what's the bet that Thomas gets one year contract, and Boekhorst is offloaded. That is reality at Carlton.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 5:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
giving daisy another playing contract is laughable because he's cooked and we should be better than that now

if he's great with the young guys and a good tactical mind hire him as a coach


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 5:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18504
Location: threeohfivethree
tap in 79 wrote:
You are right, I am very much caught up in his previous salary. It saddens me that Carlton is a laughing stock, and it is because of decisions such as that one to hire Thomas. It is like offering $90,000 for a car that no one else in the market was willing to pay more than $30,000.


What happened previously is of no relevance at all.

I don't mind if he stays or goes but the decision needs to be made based on total list balance not because you're being petulant. If there are others headed to the wreckers first and Silvagni thinks we can get a $30000 car for $20000 then we should.

And "laughing stock"? Are you being teased at school? The general talk about our club is 80% positive assuming you're not reading the little paper.

Our list has improved immensely over the last two years. How about we let those who've done that follow their course rather than throwing our rattles out of the cot over one decision on which they have far more insight and information than you do.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 5:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:23 am
Posts: 1797
Location: Half Back Flanker...
So, that gives us an unconfirmed or rumoured list of:

Jaksch
Buckley
Gorringe
Sheehan
Glass-McCasker
Gallucci
Korcheck
Armfield (retired)

No real surprises, I guess...

_________________
"...that's the thing about opinion - you don't have to know anything to have one..." Andre Agassi commenting on Pat Cash 2004
"...the less you know - the more you believe..." - Bono 2006


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:06 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
grrofunger wrote:
Getting rid of KJ is a dumb move


a ridiculous move


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:20 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
tap in 79 wrote:
let's face facts for most of the year he was one of the club's bottom 4 or 6 players


That's just not true. Thomas is in our top 30 players. Our list build still has a fair way to go.

Say he is overpaid, say he is a shadow of his former self, but you can't say he is in our bottom 6.

The reason he will be retained is because we have at least half a dozen blokes who need to go first.

I don't have a problem with a 1 year contract on significantly less money. If we're moving forward as a club, he should be forced out of the team next year and spend much of the season in the VFL helping our kids develop.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:25 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Rexy wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
Getting rid of KJ is a dumb move


a ridiculous move

Why keep a player they won't pick?

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:48 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48542
Location: Prison Island
How old is he 22? KPP's take time, clearly has talent

He must be the laziest person on earth or a complete prick to the coaches etc etc- to warrant delisting

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:02 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10488
My belief is Collingwood is showing interest in KJ. Typical us, losing a player for nothing and watch him burn it .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:05 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
grrofunger wrote:
Getting rid of KJ is a dumb move


SOS was more than happy to trade away KJ when at the Giants because he knew he was no good.

I'd be surprised if Boakhurst survives as SOS could not believe we recruited him in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:13 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
trublubattler knows whats up

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:16 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
I think about KJ getting the arse due to 'attitude'...... then I think of the Captain getting owned by Nic Newman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
1 game in two years will do that to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1632 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 ... 82  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 102 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group