Cazzesman wrote:
Walsh wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Walsh wrote:
I gotta say, all these large size Disney characters you're posting (with no text added) are an improvement on your contributions over the last 2 months
My inner feelings on the club actually. It is what it is.
Why attempt to be subliminal now after you have been shooting your mouth off at '11' for months.
Did you ever ask yourself - if Teague was a Master coach, why couldn't he adjust his game plan to incorporate a greater defensive capability?
More often than not team Defense and a fierce desire for the contest wins finals.
Regards Cazzesman Imprint and tone for effort starts in the middle - and the midfield is hopeless. I am sure all serious football students would know that.
I'm long past being a student but I will ask Blue Vain. Apparently he thinks you need to get a grip on reality and I trust his opinion.

Having said that.............you can't have it both ways. It is the Coaches job to work with what he has at his disposal and make adjustments when issues pop up. If there were issues in the midfield and defense he needed to implement a work around. If we needed to become a more negative team at time, to stop the 23 x 5+ goal run-ons, then surely that comes within his purview.
I'm just asking for a friend who's a student of the game, but confused with ours.
Regards Cazzesman[/quote]
Just as much Clarko had to work with Xavier Ellis and the delisted albeit I rate Xavier Ellis higher than Dow, LOB and SPS.
We are going to keep blaming coaches and over rating the list if that midfield isn't rectified. Attacking free flowing football needs midfield halving the contest. You cant halve the contest when no in the middle is able to tackle and win a clearance... besides all that - forward line and back six performed to expectation it was the midfield that constantly let them down - until thats fixed another coach will get sacked because the buffoons have been overrating the list for 15 years,