Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 06, 2025 4:05 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5310 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 ... 266  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25545
Location: Bondi Beach
ColourMan wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
Hardwick didn’t play a young Cotchin in the backline, he gave him every possible opportunity to develop as a mid.

As Cotchin developed as a mid (by playing in the midfield), Richmond started to make meaningful progress.


I think you have the mental desire, drive, and intensity to get involved physically that is Cotchin, confused with the player that is SPS. SPS has none of the above.

SPS is a skillful player but he is not the player who will win you a hard fought, contested possession, in the heat of battle, in the centre square, when it counts. That's probably why he is not playing there.

I would have Fisher in the centre square rotations long before SPS.

Regards Cazzesman


I think you’re the one who is confused, so I will spell it out for you in simple terms... players are being played out of position!!!!!

I agree with you, I would have Fisher in the centre square rotations too!!!

Fish averaged 19 touches a game as a 17 year old in the WAFL...

I would also have Dow (who was the best performed mid out of the top 10 kids in his draft year) in centre square rotations too!!!!

I wouldn’t totally banish the old boys, Curnow, Murphy etc there should be a balance, the youngsters need to develop, they are the ones who will take us significantly further....

As for SPS, his first 2 and half years playing as a mid/forward compared very well with Cotchin’s first few years... SPS had more Brownlow votes at the same stage of their careers.

Cotchin is a champion, however he had issues with his tank and dealing with tags, he wasn’t the finished product in his early years at Richmond, yet

SPS, Dow or Fisher aren’t the finished product yet either, few are this early in their career.

However our three young mids have shown promising signs, who can win their own ball, and since Teague has arrived they’ve been banished from centre square rotations, stalling their development!!!

As for SPS, checkout his stats when played as a mid.... also checkout round 7, 2017 and round 5, 2019, he was brilliant (against serious opposition with excellent, deep midfields), contested possessions/clearances, i50s, tackles, score involvements etc. etc. etc. etc.


Cotchins career started with an achilles injury that kept him from virtually playing any football in his first year, and his second year started a long way behind. No hope of winning Brownlow votes. Carlton supporters let out a sigh of relief we took Kreuzer at No 1, not Cotchin. When Cotchin got on his bike, fit again, he showed us why he was taken at No2, and for some, like me, why he should have been taken at pick No 1.

I really wasn't kind towards Cotchin in his first 2 years, but I was young and silly back then. :wink:

But I understand why you want more time for players we drafted in the positions we drafted them for, and agree.

I'm not as cocky as you with regards to SPS ability.
Allright, he got Brownlow votes on a wet slippery day, and played another 20+ games in the midfield after that and didn't win another vote. Just sayin'.


Cotchin played 15 games in his first year, 10 in his second year... the knock on him as in TAC was his tank, and ability to handle tags... the good thing about watching Cotchin play in the TAC, was I got to see Kruezer play too... :grin:

As for SPS, against the Pies (Round 7 2017) on a wet slippery day:

16 Kicks, 5 Handballs, 21 Disposals, 4 Marks, 2 Goals, 1 Behind, 3 Tackles, 1 Goal Assist, 2 Inside 50s, 3 Clearances,
2 Clangers, 2 Rebound 50s, 10 Contested Disposals, 12 Uncontested Possessions, 15 Effective Disposals, 1 Mark Inside 50,
2 One Percenters, 1 Centre Clearance, 2 Stoppage Clearances, 7 Score Involvements, 312 Metres Gained, 4 Turnovers,
3 Intercepts, 1 Tackle Inside 50, 68% Time on Ground, 3 Brownlow Votes

Dogs (Round 5, 2019), under the roof, on a dry, fast track:

14 Kicks, 21 Handballs, 35 Disposals, 7 Marks, 1 Goals, 1 Behind, 0 Tackles, 0 Goal Assist, 4 Inside 50s, 7 Clearances,
4 Clangers, 2 Rebound 50s, 15 Contested Disposals, 23 Uncontested Possessions, 31 Effective Disposals, 1 Mark Inside 50,
2 One Percenters, 2 Centre Clearance, 5 Stoppage Clearances, 1 Score Involvements, 320 Metres Gained, 1 Turnover,
5 Intercepts, 0 Tackle Inside 50, 85% Time on Ground, 2 Brownlow Votes

You can see the improvement in his numbers...

He hunted the football, he hunted the man, he was creative, he was able to do it in different conditions (in the wet and under the roof), he won his own ball, on the inside/outside... was he the finished product, absolutely not, however he looks lost in the back half, and it's not like we're flush with mids of any age, we have no depth in the midfield, we get consistently run over in games, that might have something to do with the midfield...

All I'm advocating is giving some midfield time to SPS, Dow and Fish to spread the load, continue their development as mids, and to find out what we have...

Maybe all three of our boys are crap, they've all shown good signs as mids so maybe not, either way let's find out, especially since we need lot's of mids!!!

And SPS got Brownlow votes in two other games after the game against the Pies. Just sayin'. :grin:


You're a legend Colourman.

Good stuff.

The issue I see hear comparing Cotchin and SPS is that they are different types of players.

If SPS hunts the ball, Cotchin really really hunts the ball and man.

I do agree there's good reason to run the likes of SPS through the middle, not only because they have done successfully, and we recruited them for that purpose, but its also good for their development.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20269
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Let's say Clarkson became available. And we could afford the $$.

Yes or No?

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25545
Location: Bondi Beach
bluehammer wrote:
Let's say Clarkson became available. And we could afford the $$.

Yes or No?


NO

NEVER


He is no good without onfield leaders Hodge Lewis and Mitchell.
They made him.
He recruited some of the best mids in the business to help his cause: O'Meara, Wingard, Mitchell, Scully...

He hasn't fired a shot with them on board.

A bit like Parkin in 1995. The team coached themselves on field.

He was lucky he had the cattle and the AFL rules that allowed him to recruit as he did....nah, he didn't even do that, Wright did.
He had the umpires whistle on his side. The AFL changed rules for him. How could he not be successful.

I'm loving this backlash he's receiving in the media...from all corners. He's a psychopath.

Do you want that @#$%&! sook coaching our boys?

We don't need him. We hate him. He hates us.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:17 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
Bondi,

The comparison between SPS (and Dow and Fisher) and Cotchin was about how they were coached and developed....

Cotchin wasn't left to rot in the backline for 25 games or more... besides that, SPS hasn't been very good in the backline... our backline has gone backwards under Teague, and you need a top notch backline to do any good at the pointy end of the year.

Cotchin exploded in year 4, this SPS's and Fisher's 4th year...

Check the highlights of SPS's game against the Dogs, don't compare him to Cotchin, tell me what you think...

Just as an aside, Thomas Dow has played more midfield time (he played exclusively in the midfield, not the back or forward half) in his 2 games for the Tigers, than Paddy has since Teague took over... I know Paddy has been injured this year however there were 11 games last year, and Paddy played round 1 this year...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:52 pm
Posts: 1857
bluehammer wrote:
Let's say Clarkson became available. And we could afford the $$.

Yes or No?


No way. That ship has sailed last year.

Flicking Teague or Liddle or Lloyd at this stage will make us a laughing stock and probably lead to resentment within the playing group. No externals would want to join either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:47 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:41 pm
Posts: 980
Teague needs another pre season to work with the players he and Austin wants at the club. He needs to be judged on from a “normal” no COVID season where he knows list sizes. New assistants are needed. Plus new mature age recruits who are around mid twenties.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:51 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20269
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
I'm also a No to Clarkson for what it's worth.

But I'm not buying that 4 flags in 8 years fell into the lap of a lucky bloke with a few stars at his disposal.

I think Teague needs some serious guidance though. And match day confidence.

I think he can learn but this is no longer a club that can afford slow and steady.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:56 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
So SPS hasn't got the stomach for the guts and is no good down back, so where does he play? Wing presumably so why isn't he there now?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:18 pm 
Offline
Banned

Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:55 pm
Posts: 2333
Paddycripps wrote:
So SPS hasn't got the stomach for the guts and is no good down back, so where does he play? Wing presumably so why isn't he there now?


He doesn't gut run and not fast enough has to be one of the two, preferably both - he has good skills and good mover and tackles hard but thats natural talent.
Majority of AFL players gut run and break lines.. when he begins to leave everything on the ground he might have a future. O'Brien gut runs and has a future with a bit more development IMO - his congestion game leaves alot to be desired but thats ok and one player I wouldnt mind seeing having a game here and there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35967
Location: Half back flank
Paddycripps wrote:
So SPS hasn't got the stomach for the guts



He really does sound lost when you put it like that

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:50 am
Posts: 1896
Location: Brisbane
bondiblue wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
Let's say Clarkson became available. And we could afford the $$.

Yes or No?


A bit like Parkin in 1995. The team coached themselves on field.


Ain't that the truth!

But I remember as if it were yesterday the same coach after our 2nd (and last) loss to St.Kilda saying:
"Carlton are the Worst team in the competition!"

(had been on top Rds. 2-8 mind you & were back there 4 weeks later)

Right now we need them to 'coach themselves' again.

Notching up LEAST Uncontested Possessions of all teams tells me it's the coach's so called 'game-plan' or lack of that's at fault.

_________________
Que Sera, Sera


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18059
bluehammer wrote:
Let's say Clarkson became available. And we could afford the $$.

Yes or No?


If I was a mod you'd be banned. :lol:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:36 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:50 am
Posts: 1896
Location: Brisbane
Clarkson is a ....

_________________
Que Sera, Sera


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:53 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20269
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Blue Vain wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
Let's say Clarkson became available. And we could afford the $$.

Yes or No?


If I was a mod you'd be banned. :lol:
I'm bored...

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:00 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Cazzesman wrote:
99prelim wrote:
AGRO wrote:
I suspect the answer to the SPS conundrum lies somewhere in the middle.

He needs to work harder but more midfield time for him might be a bit like some more chicken soup when you have a cold, “it wouldn’t hurt”.


:lol:



Yep...coaches have to find different ways to turn on the switch...stubbornly keeping him at HB is not working

Teague can't have it both ways. If he wants him at HB and he's not delivering, FFS drop him

Otherwise a spell elsewhere on the ground could also be part of that 'switch flicking' strategy. It's as though Teague has now dug his heels in and doesn't want to admit he couldve done things differently (that's how it looks anyway to me )


Edited for accuracy for all those who think that a person can transport themselves into the body of someone else and see through their eyes

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
99prelim wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
99prelim wrote:
AGRO wrote:
I suspect the answer to the SPS conundrum lies somewhere in the middle.

He needs to work harder but more midfield time for him might be a bit like some more chicken soup when you have a cold, “it wouldn’t hurt”.


:lol:



Yep...coaches have to find different ways to turn on the switch...stubbornly keeping him at HB is not working

Teague can't have it both ways. If he wants him at HB and he's not delivering, FFS drop him

Otherwise a spell elsewhere on the ground could also be part of that 'switch flicking' strategy. It's as though Teague has now dug his heels in and doesn't want to admit he couldve done things differently (that's how it looks anyway to me )


Edited for accuracy for all those who think that a person can transport themselves into the body of someone else and see through their eyes

Regards Cazzesman


:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:02 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
bluehammer wrote:
I'm also a No to Clarkson for what it's worth.

But I'm not buying that 4 flags in 8 years fell into the lap of a lucky bloke with a few stars at his disposal.

I think Teague needs some serious guidance though. And match day confidence.

I think he can learn but this is no longer a club that can afford slow and steady.

I hear Worsfold is leaving the cheats end of this season.

Could give guidance in all sorts of directions, one of them being down.

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:43 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10624
BlueJean wrote:
Teague needs another pre season to work with the players he and Austin wants at the club. He needs to be judged on from a “normal” no COVID season where he knows list sizes. New assistants are needed. Plus new mature age recruits who are around mid twenties.


That’s not an issue any longer. Enough with the excuses.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:17 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20269
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
I'm also a No to Clarkson for what it's worth.

But I'm not buying that 4 flags in 8 years fell into the lap of a lucky bloke with a few stars at his disposal.

I think Teague needs some serious guidance though. And match day confidence.

I think he can learn but this is no longer a club that can afford slow and steady.

I hear Worsfold is leaving the cheats end of this season.

Could give guidance in all sorts of directions, one of them being down.
Goodwin will be available.

We can add him to the list with Worsfold.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:16 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
bluehammer wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
I'm also a No to Clarkson for what it's worth.

But I'm not buying that 4 flags in 8 years fell into the lap of a lucky bloke with a few stars at his disposal.

I think Teague needs some serious guidance though. And match day confidence.

I think he can learn but this is no longer a club that can afford slow and steady.

I hear Worsfold is leaving the cheats end of this season.

Could give guidance in all sorts of directions, one of them being down.
Goodwin will be available.

We can add him to the list with Worsfold.

Forgot about Goodwin. He likes "the good stuff".

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5310 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 ... 266  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group