tap in 79 wrote:
Silvagni actually has some good suggestions here about free agency in this article.
Eg top 8 clubs can only get free agents from other top 8 clubs.
Let’s face facts. Carlton lost Zach Tuohy for example as he wanted to play in a competitive team.
He tried to hide it in the interviews saying it was about $$, yeah sure but we all know the real reason he left.
You can bet your bottom $ that the AFL will be slow to react about free agency. It is vital they do something now, not in 3 years time, as most of the high quality free agents go to top teams, further entrenching inequality.
I would also suggest reforming the draft.eg Carlton pick 1, 14& 23. for coming last instead of just pick 1. Pick 14 might have to be used for a trade? Something that gives more than just a teenager that takes 4 years to develop.
If the AFL can’t do any of the above, perhaps it is time to go nuclear option-full free market, no draft, no salary cap. Wage explosion. Carlton could compete in that environment.
https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/carlt ... b0dce3c8f1He wasn't hiding anything, he didn't want to leave, which is why he was pissed when the list manager low balled him!
Tuohy was offered less than what we were paying Lamb!!
The list manager wanted Geelong's first rounder to use for the Marchbank trade, therefore Tuohy was expendable and considered easily replaceable.
So Marchbank cost us pick 23 & Tuohy; more astute trading by the list manager.
No problem getting Marchbank, it's what we paid; we did get Smedts & pick 63 (Polson) as well.
The list manager bangs on about a dearth of players in the right age group, he got rid of one who didn't want to leave!!!