Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 5:22 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
Synbad wrote:
But all i hear is "were young" and i look around and see a whole heap of teams saying the same thing


Teams can say it but is it true Synbad?

Matthew Knights constantly talks about his young team but they're putting out a team equivalent in age to Adelaide!
Mark Harvey spruikes his young team but they were on average a year older than the Carlton boys on Sunday.

Our players are 2 - 21/2 years behind St Kilda and Geelong. How good will Kruezer, Gibbs, Murphy, Bower, Hampson etc etc be in 2012?
That's when comparisons with the top teams should be made.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:27 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
24.7

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Blue Vain wrote:
Synbad wrote:
But all i hear is "were young" and i look around and see a whole heap of teams saying the same thing


Teams can say it but is it true Synbad?

Matthew Knights constantly talks about his young team but they're putting out a team equivalent in age to Adelaide!
Mark Harvey spruikes his young team but they were on average a year older than the Carlton boys on Sunday.

Our players are 2 - 21/2 years behind St Kilda and Geelong. How good will Kruezer, Gibbs, Murphy, Bower, Hampson etc etc be in 2012?
That's when comparisons with the top teams should be made.



No, im just asking how old was Hawthorns team when they won the flag last year BV...
And oes that mean if we swapped Dew for Garlett we are a premiership chance?

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:28 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
I will say it again 24.7

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Sydney Blue wrote:
24.7



Ok so next year we should win the flag???

Look we should go out and get Hall... that should fix us right???

Flag favourites.

We should be older than 24.7 by then with the same side and Hall...

Also...why not play Scotland Stevens Hadley and get our average age up????

See.. its not about age.... its about what you do with the list you own...

Its one excuse after the other...

Dark decade can easily become a dark 2 decades.... ask Richmond supporters..

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:32 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:35 pm
Posts: 167
Belisarius wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Essendon* are front runners and wont achieve anything under Knights.
They are 16th for blocks in the AFL and their playing philosophy is based on running ahead of the contest. In fact, Knights instructs his players to avoid blocking and to run hard to create an option for the recieve!
When the game is nice and open and they're controlling the uncontested ball, they're world beaters but when the opposition dominate the tempo of the game, they are garbage.
The key is to make them accountable for their actions. Our players need to spread from the contest when we win possession and control the uncontested ball as well. Teams too often take them on and focus on the contested possession but taking advantage of their "looseness" is the key.

Have a look at their effort against Geelong. 78 points down at 3/4 time before Geelong rested all their stars.
Teams need to have a gamestyle that is sustainable in September as well. Theirs wont come close.


A very astute post BV :thumbsup:

Most of the great coaches of any team sport advocate getting the defensive side right first. That is where I see our improvement, whereas others seem to think we are stagnating or going backwards as a team. Ratts is trying to teach our players to play defensive football. Sometimes we don't get the balance right and that causes confusion in the ranks especially for those who aren't defensively minded.

We had the best defensive unit in 2001, just a year later we had the worst. Since then we have been in the top four for points conceded, generally top two.
2001- 16
2002- 1
2003- 2
2004- 4
2005- 1
2006- 2
2007- 1
2008- 4

To date we are lying 8th in the points against table. I think we can possibly improve that a spot or two and at the very least stay there. It has never just been about the back six as to why we have been so poor defensively. We have been poor as team.

We showed in 2007 that we know how to run forward of the ball and thus were ranked 6th for points for, but what is the point if you have conceded just under 400 more points than the second worst defence and a staggering just under 1300 more than the best. That was awful defensively :sad:

Even with the stats indicating improvement I think we are a better team team defensively and we value possession (which is not something the long kicking style under Pagan did). As we are still learning we can look stilted and uncertain, but I think as we gain confidence and become more comfortable with our defensive responsibilities we will be much better at two way football.


You are only as good as your midfield allows you to be.

When we had just Stevens and Murph our defence and attach was pathetic
When we had Stevens, Murph and Gibbs our defence and attack was bad
Now with Judd, Murph, Gibbs and carrotts and stevo our dence and attack is improving.
We had a chance to get a gun midfielder in Rich which would have made us:
Judd, Murph, Gibbs, Rich, Carrotts, Stevo our defence and attach would be good if not really good.

They control how the balls goes into the forward line and how often and how quick it goes into our defence.

Hawthorn had an average defencive 6 at best but with their midfield and game plan were able to make their back 6 look great


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:32 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
Here is all the info here Synbad

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_m ... s?mid=4134


Not only that they only had 3 players with less than 50 games - last weekend we fielded 11 or 12

They also had 11 players over 100 games - last week we had 4

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:33 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Sydney Blue wrote:
I will say it again 24.7

And i explained how that doesnt have credibility.. if you add Stevens Scotland and Hadley into that side....

Or dont you get that bit?

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Sydney Blue wrote:
Here is all the info here Synbad

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_m ... s?mid=4134


Not only that they only had 3 players with less than 50 games - last weekend we fielded 11 or 12

They also had 11 players over 100 games - last week we had 4


We can fix that with adding Stevens Scotland and Hadley into the side...

And by the end of the year... we will have a few more that would have played 50... would they be ready to win a flag???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:35 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
Synbad wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
24.7



Ok so next year we should win the flag???

Look we should go out and get Hall... that should fix us right???

Flag favourites.

We should be older than 24.7 by then with the same side and Hall...

Also...why not play Scotland Stevens Hadley and get our average age up????

See.. its not about age.... its about what you do with the list you own...

Its one excuse after the other...

Dark decade can easily become a dark 2 decades.... ask Richmond supporters..



Next year we could be younger again because blokes like Stevens Scotland and Houlihan will start to struggle to get a game

when we have a core group of about 14-15 players that have developed together with 80 games plus we will be a far better side

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Syd and what is it about Ratts that suggests he is getting the most out of our players including the older ones you believe shouldnt make the team next year..... to make us even younger???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:46 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Ok put it this way...

Our more elderly statesmen all look like they have hit some kind of glass ceiling.... including Fev...

Were not getting more out of them... and they are stagnating and going backwards.... some in a real hurry...

Then there are kids that ebb and flow like we know kids do...

Then there are middle tier players who havent really put their hand up...


So were using the analogy that as they get older they will be better...but how do you know when you watch the older ones falling away????

Just cos a list is young does not mean it will automatically bring success as they get older.

What players seem to be coming along in leaps and bounds at any age???

Would there be ten????

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:49 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
DownUnderChick wrote:
You must seriously read the paper and then quote an assistant as a person of interest in the coaching role based on that person's name being in the paper.


Being a mod i'd think you would read through every post to see that i mentioned both these names Sanderson and Laidley in a post several days ago before they appeared in todays the paper.

You owe me an apology or i'll will request you be banned for 24 hours for making false accusations


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:53 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
Synbad wrote:
Syd and what is it about Ratts that suggests he is getting the most out of our players including the older ones you believe shouldnt make the team next year..... to make us even younger???


Joseph has improved
Austin has improved
Gibbs has improved
Kruez has improved
Jamison has improved
Bower has improved
Hampson has improved
Betts - best season yet
Armfield is improving
Murphy - is improving
Setanta - has improved
Garlett - gets better every game
Russel- ducks head - has improved slightly
Carrazzo- been injured but played his best game ever last week - kicking really improved


Judd- is the same
Simpson - is the same
Thornton -same
Waite - was having his best year
Johnson - has been injured most of the year

Houlihan- Cloke - Scotland - Stevens - Wiggins - Hadley - Fisher - have all gone backwards


and Fev - well who knows what he is doing


Not a bad overall result but of the ones that have gone backwards they have had question marks over their heads for quite some time now

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
99prelim wrote:
+1.....RUTHLESS TO TOOTHLESS IN 15 YEARS (the club and some supporters)


99prelim wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:

That is such a ridiculous thing to say.

The Club is in the process of turning around the on-field fortunes of the club, the worst it's ever been, and hasn't yet had the chance to return to Carlton's best, ruthless ways.

You think shitcanning the club, coach and players is ruthless? It's lame. Bordering on pathetic.


looking forward to the treasure trove of surprises both on field and off field over the next 18 months


Same, but possibly not in the same way you are.

You imply you know something from inside the club. Real, or is it just "I know a guy, who knows a guy, whose next-door neighbour said his mate told him...."?

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 1:56 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
woof wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
yep very clear - take that St Kilda game - no wait, can't take that one, we played well, take the Bummers game, yep that one we can take, and the freo game - but only the first quarter really, ignore the rest of the game we dominated (though we missed the shots on goal in the third). Remember the hawks game - oh no we must dismiss that, but we can remember the Collingwood game right - wrong, so umm what games do we take heed of? The ones we lost - the rest we should have won or were lucky to win - so ignore them.

yep its very clear Ratts can't coach - all things considered :grin:


He will be questioned until the team becomes consistent.
Right know there are two teams that are consistent (Geel & StK), four teams (Adel, Coll, WB, Bris) that have had bad patches but have been able to string wins together and then the group making up numbers (Carl, Ess, Port Adel, Haw, Syd). I reckon we should be in the second tier.



As Dannyboy points out questioning is different to he isn't the man.

Following on from your observations isn't it funny we have won four of five games against your second tier and lost all four against your third tier teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:01 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
Sydney Blue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Syd and what is it about Ratts that suggests he is getting the most out of our players including the older ones you believe shouldnt make the team next year..... to make us even younger???


Joseph has improved
Austin has improved
Gibbs has improved
Kruez has improved
Jamison has improved
Bower has improved
Hampson has improved
Betts - best season yet
Armfield is improving
Murphy - is improving
Setanta - has improved
Garlett - gets better every game
Russel- ducks head - has improved slightly
Carrazzo- been injured but played his best game ever last week - kicking really improved


Judd- is the same
Simpson - is the same
Thornton -same
Waite - was having his best year
Johnson - has been injured most of the year

Houlihan- Cloke - Scotland - Stevens - Wiggins - Hadley - Fisher - have all gone backwards


and Fev - well who knows what he is doing


Not a bad overall result but of the ones that have gone backwards they have had question marks over their heads for quite some time now


Unfortunately that is where perception comes in....... I agree with you, but I'm sure Synbad won't :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:04 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Sydney Blue wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Syd and what is it about Ratts that suggests he is getting the most out of our players including the older ones you believe shouldnt make the team next year..... to make us even younger???


Joseph has improved
Austin has improved
Gibbs has improved
Kruez has improved
Jamison has improved
Bower has improved
Hampson has improved
Betts - best season yet
Armfield is improving
Murphy - is improving
Setanta - has improved
Garlett - gets better every game
Russel- ducks head - has improved slightly
Carrazzo- been injured but played his best game ever last week - kicking really improved


Judd- is the same
Simpson - is the same
Thornton -same
Waite - was having his best year
Johnson - has been injured most of the year

Houlihan- Cloke - Scotland - Stevens - Wiggins - Hadley - Fisher - have all gone backwards


and Fev - well who knows what he is doing


Not a bad overall result but of the ones that have gone backwards they have had question marks over their heads for quite some time now


Whatabout everybody else on our list???

And some of the ones you reckon are improving are improving cos theyre in the system now...

And lets just take Betts for example... improving at what?Kicking even more out of his arse????
Im a huge Betts fan.... but do you believe Betts can have more of a role in the middle to improve him even more or is his best position always going to be the guy who touches it 9 times at isolation corner and kicks 2 out of his backside???

Setanta... how much development was put into him by this coaching regime? or has he just come out and played against all odds?

Hartlett... we have 10 tall defenders do we need him playing week in week out in defence of the ressies or is it an opportunity this week..to bring him in and play him as a forward ... for 3 or 4 weeks and hope we can develop some kind of forward out of him...

Russell.. with 40 games as a tagger and being in the top 4 runners at the club do you take the tag role away from him and get him to become a line breaking runner??


Id say of all those you listed ... the two who have GENUINELY come along are Bower and Joseph..
The others are always going to improve organically at whatever rate without development.

Carrazzo... he will never be a defender... is it wise to get him to be an on baller and get his hands on the ball for us.. or just have him as a flanker??

And whats the gameplan????

Cos really youre saying alot of players are coming along... but were a muddle...(youre putting it down to age .. im putting it down to gameplan)

And not once have i blamed the playing group.... i believe we have MORE talent than we have illustrated...not that we have no talent...

Good to see you agree its not the playing list......

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Belisarius with all that up and coming talent we should be showing improvement in the style of play if the coaching was technically ok right??? :thumbsup:

So you agree...!!!.. it has nothing to do with the list....

Excellent my point all along...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 2:16 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Again what im trying to say is the kids are improving bit by bit...
Kreuzer is an excellent player... and battled manfully...
Kids have defficiencies...has Grigg and Murph for example taken on more of a defensive accountability mindset.?
Does special K need to look at the opposition ruckman at the bounces?
IS Armfield the man you give the ball to kick out after a point or collect the handball receive?
Can Russell run the lines?
Can Gibbs go forward to kick a goal?
Can we get more out of Betts ?



Why are all our older players who have little upside now fallen away???

I do not believe there is a problem with the talent list.... just with how we utilise it..

How do the players all fit in with each other playing our code on match day???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Headplant and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group