Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 06, 2025 7:12 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5310 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 ... 266  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2020 7:07 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
AGRO wrote:
Not asking that Teague play Fisher, Dow and SPS in the middle at the same time (like Bolton did) but singularly they should be attending centre bounces at relevant points during the game.



Correct...we can't use the blanket, "they''ll be monstered" as a mitigating factor to deny them every f%$%&^& CSB

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 17002
Location: Melbourne
99prelim wrote:
AGRO wrote:
I suspect the answer to the SPS conundrum lies somewhere in the middle.

He needs to work harder but more midfield time for him might be a bit like some more chicken soup when you have a cold, “it wouldn’t hurt”.


:lol:



Yep...coaches have to find different ways to turn on the switch...stubbornly keeping him at HB is not working

Teague can't have it both ways. If he wants him at HB and he's not delivering, FFS drop him

Otherwise a spell elsewhere on the ground could also be part of that 'switch flicking' strategy. It's as though Teague has now dug his heels in and doesn't want to admit he couldve done things differently (that's how it looks anyway to me )


Edited for accuracy.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:33 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6767
Cazzesman wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
Hardwick didn’t play a young Cotchin in the backline, he gave him every possible opportunity to develop as a mid.

As Cotchin developed as a mid (by playing in the midfield), Richmond started to make meaningful progress.


I think you have the mental desire, drive, and intensity to get involved physically that is Cotchin, confused with the player that is SPS. SPS has none of the above.

SPS is a skillful player but he is not the player who will win you a hard fought, contested possession, in the heat of battle, in the centre square, when it counts. That's probably why he is not playing there.

I would have Fisher in the centre square rotations long before SPS.

Regards Cazzesman

He might not be a Cotchin, but with a Rodeo background, you can't say he would't be hard at it in the middle.
You just have to look at his stats.
2017 he played 20 games averaging 14 disposals, 2.1 clearances, 4.8 tackles and kicked 10 goals.
2018 he played 22 games averaging 16.1 disposals, 1.3 clearances, 4.3 tackles and kicked 5 goals.
2019 he played 22 games averaging 19.1 disposals, 2.1 clearances, 4.4 tackles and kicked 4 goals.
2020 he has played 13 games averaging 12.5 disposals, 1 clearance, 2.2 tackles and 0 goals.
What is happening, is he is being played out of position.

And as a comparison:
Trents tackling and clearance average stats. for his first 4 years.
2008 2.1 tackles, 0 clearances
2009 2.1 tackles, 0 clearances
2010 3.9 tackles, 4.8 clearances
2011 3.3 tackles, 6.1 clearances


Have you or anyone seen SPS play in the same 'fearless, intense' fashion in which Cotchin plays?

SPS does not hunt the footy the way Cotchin does in heavy congestion. Perhaps what's happening is SPS does work hard enough, doesn't run both ways and needs to lift his work rate for 4 quarters. I'm surprised he is still getting a game.

Regards Cazzesman

As I stated already he's no Cotchin but is not soft either.
You don't average that many tackles being soft.

Comparisons aside, Teague is killing him down back.
And no matter what way people want to try and paint him as a player, effort, etc. He is 100% being played out of position.
He was not drafted as a Half Back, he is not a defensive player.
Draft stats below (it even says how he should be played in the AFL).

Name: Sam Petrevski-Seton
Position: Midfield/half-forward
DOB: 19-02-1998
Height: 181cm
Weight: 76kg
Draft range: 5-10

Pub summary
Speedy half-forward/midfielder who loves to bring his teammates into the game and can use the ball well with both feet and knows how to find the goals.

Strengths
Pace
Sidestep
Ball use
Clean
Ability to kick well on both feet
Goal kicking ability
Unselfish

Weaknesses
Strength
Endurance
Consistency
Overall

Petrevski-Seton played senior football with Claremont in Western Australia in 2015, preparing him for the competitiveness of senior AFL football. Niggling injuries prevented him from playing senior football again this season, however, he has produced impressive numbers when on the park for his colts side in WA.

He has brilliant explosive speed and silky ball use. His light frame means he is unlikely to play in the midfield when first drafted, but after serving his apprenticeship as a small forward, he will no doubt graduate into the midfield later in his career.

Knows his way around goal, but he needs to work on his strength in and around the contest, which will come as he matures in the AFL system. He does not rack up a huge number of possessions, however, his disposals are worth their weight in gold.

Under-18 Championships statistics

Games: 2
Average disposals: 18.5
Average contested possessions: 9
Goals: 1
Average marks: 2.5
Average tackles: 5.5
Average clearances: 2.5
Average clangers: 4
Average inside 50s: 3


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:13 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25545
Location: Bondi Beach
Hey Sidex those Player Profile definetely says HF-Mid to me too.
I agree there's a strong case he is played out of position, but 6 disposals from HB is pitiful...I know the arument Teague has killed Bambi.

I haven't seen explosive speed.
Maybe he has the knack of wrong footing opponents and seems to explode away from them, or he does have that pace.

Goal kicking ability is something we need, but also good delivery to our forwards.

It seems like such a waste, but on form he shouldn't be playing HB or in the first 22.
Maybe Teague sees him as the only other HB with Newman and Marchbank (and Plowman last game) on the sidelines.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:15 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6767
Hey Bondi, like you and every other Carlton supporter, I'm confused as to what Teague is trying to do with him.
But I agree he should either be moved forward up the ground or dropped, because we are slowly seeing week by week the death of a very talented kid.
And a head coach should understand this and his players and that some players are either attack, defence or both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:14 am 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7560
Location: NowHere.....
I think the biggest issue with playing SPS in the midfield is his lack of speed. We are already slow enough, which is why we need Dow to come on. It's just a shame injury has stalled his season.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:30 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
bondiblue wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2ojJ4sqjqA
Watch this from the 22 minute nark for a while.


You want unstructured footy.

He said words to the effect of:
Structured footy is for white boys. Let the indigenous boys play to their strengths.

I hate structured footy but there is no way to win games now without having a structure.
There is an in between.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:52 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:41 pm
Posts: 980
Does anyone else here find Teague’s voice patronising in his pressers. Perhaps a tad cocky, yet completely unwarranted.
This could be a concern. On the other hand, what you see/hear is what you get with Ratts, which appears to have a positive affect on the winning saints.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:03 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4499
Location: Perth
I personally don’t have any issues with Teague in his pressers. Actually think he presents pretty well.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:08 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6767
Lace Out wrote:
I think the biggest issue with playing SPS in the midfield is his lack of speed. We are already slow enough, which is why we need Dow to come on. It's just a shame injury has stalled his season.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk


Doesn't look too slow to me.
Just a lazy 35 touches.



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:10 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14787
Location: Sydney
BlueJean wrote:
Does anyone else here find Teague’s voice patronising in his pressers. Perhaps a tad cocky, yet completely unwarranted.


nope :smile:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 2:00 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
bondiblue wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
Hardwick didn’t play a young Cotchin in the backline, he gave him every possible opportunity to develop as a mid.

As Cotchin developed as a mid (by playing in the midfield), Richmond started to make meaningful progress.


I think you have the mental desire, drive, and intensity to get involved physically that is Cotchin, confused with the player that is SPS. SPS has none of the above.

SPS is a skillful player but he is not the player who will win you a hard fought, contested possession, in the heat of battle, in the centre square, when it counts. That's probably why he is not playing there.

I would have Fisher in the centre square rotations long before SPS.

Regards Cazzesman


I think you’re the one who is confused, so I will spell it out for you in simple terms... players are being played out of position!!!!!

I agree with you, I would have Fisher in the centre square rotations too!!!

Fish averaged 19 touches a game as a 17 year old in the WAFL...

I would also have Dow (who was the best performed mid out of the top 10 kids in his draft year) in centre square rotations too!!!!

I wouldn’t totally banish the old boys, Curnow, Murphy etc there should be a balance, the youngsters need to develop, they are the ones who will take us significantly further....

As for SPS, his first 2 and half years playing as a mid/forward compared very well with Cotchin’s first few years... SPS had more Brownlow votes at the same stage of their careers.

Cotchin is a champion, however he had issues with his tank and dealing with tags, he wasn’t the finished product in his early years at Richmond, yet

SPS, Dow or Fisher aren’t the finished product yet either, few are this early in their career.

However our three young mids have shown promising signs, who can win their own ball, and since Teague has arrived they’ve been banished from centre square rotations, stalling their development!!!

As for SPS, checkout his stats when played as a mid.... also checkout round 7, 2017 and round 5, 2019, he was brilliant (against serious opposition with excellent, deep midfields), contested possessions/clearances, i50s, tackles, score involvements etc. etc. etc. etc.


Cotchins career started with an achilles injury that kept him from virtually playing any football in his first year, and his second year started a long way behind. No hope of winning Brownlow votes. Carlton supporters let out a sigh of relief we took Kreuzer at No 1, not Cotchin. When Cotchin got on his bike, fit again, he showed us why he was taken at No2, and for some, like me, why he should have been taken at pick No 1.

I really wasn't kind towards Cotchin in his first 2 years, but I was young and silly back then. :wink:

But I understand why you want more time for players we drafted in the positions we drafted them for, and agree.

I'm not as cocky as you with regards to SPS ability.
Allright, he got Brownlow votes on a wet slippery day, and played another 20+ games in the midfield after that and didn't win another vote. Just sayin'.


Cotchin played 15 games in his first year, 10 in his second year... the knock on him as in TAC was his tank, and ability to handle tags... the good thing about watching Cotchin play in the TAC, was I got to see Kruezer play too... :grin:

As for SPS, against the Pies (Round 7 2017) on a wet slippery day:

16 Kicks, 5 Handballs, 21 Disposals, 4 Marks, 2 Goals, 1 Behind, 3 Tackles, 1 Goal Assist, 2 Inside 50s, 3 Clearances,
2 Clangers, 2 Rebound 50s, 10 Contested Disposals, 12 Uncontested Possessions, 15 Effective Disposals, 1 Mark Inside 50,
2 One Percenters, 1 Centre Clearance, 2 Stoppage Clearances, 7 Score Involvements, 312 Metres Gained, 4 Turnovers,
3 Intercepts, 1 Tackle Inside 50, 68% Time on Ground, 3 Brownlow Votes

Dogs (Round 5, 2019), under the roof, on a dry, fast track:

14 Kicks, 21 Handballs, 35 Disposals, 7 Marks, 1 Goals, 1 Behind, 0 Tackles, 0 Goal Assist, 4 Inside 50s, 7 Clearances,
4 Clangers, 2 Rebound 50s, 15 Contested Disposals, 23 Uncontested Possessions, 31 Effective Disposals, 1 Mark Inside 50,
2 One Percenters, 2 Centre Clearance, 5 Stoppage Clearances, 1 Score Involvements, 320 Metres Gained, 1 Turnover,
5 Intercepts, 0 Tackle Inside 50, 85% Time on Ground, 2 Brownlow Votes

You can see the improvement in his numbers...

He hunted the football, he hunted the man, he was creative, he was able to do it in different conditions (in the wet and under the roof), he won his own ball, on the inside/outside... was he the finished product, absolutely not, however he looks lost in the back half, and it's not like we're flush with mids of any age, we have no depth in the midfield, we get consistently run over in games, that might have something to do with the midfield...

All I'm advocating is giving some midfield time to SPS, Dow and Fish to spread the load, continue their development as mids, and to find out what we have...

Maybe all three of our boys are crap, they've all shown good signs as mids so maybe not, either way let's find out, especially since we need lot's of mids!!!

And SPS got Brownlow votes in two other games after the game against the Pies. Just sayin'. :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 2:10 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 7:41 pm
Posts: 980
Perhaps "patronising" is the wrong word. Perhaps it is difficult to converse to the media when its via Zoom format. I know from personal experience that it is not a natural feeling talking to a computer screen as opposed to a person in the room. I do feel that Teague's public speaking could do with some improvement. I guess that this will come with experience but I do feel that there is a tinge of "artificial" front to his media work. Perhaps he has been told to "play a straight bat', which is not my choice in communication style.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 2:18 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 3:51 pm
Posts: 546
regarding sps he has to increase his strength and fitness over pre season to play a mid role position in 21 / trade him back to perth side if he is not happy in melbourne ,because him playing HBF is not working


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 2:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24654
Location: Kaloyasena
ColourMan wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
Hardwick didn’t play a young Cotchin in the backline, he gave him every possible opportunity to develop as a mid.

As Cotchin developed as a mid (by playing in the midfield), Richmond started to make meaningful progress.


I think you have the mental desire, drive, and intensity to get involved physically that is Cotchin, confused with the player that is SPS. SPS has none of the above.

SPS is a skillful player but he is not the player who will win you a hard fought, contested possession, in the heat of battle, in the centre square, when it counts. That's probably why he is not playing there.

I would have Fisher in the centre square rotations long before SPS.

Regards Cazzesman


I think you’re the one who is confused, so I will spell it out for you in simple terms... players are being played out of position!!!!!

I agree with you, I would have Fisher in the centre square rotations too!!!

Fish averaged 19 touches a game as a 17 year old in the WAFL...

I would also have Dow (who was the best performed mid out of the top 10 kids in his draft year) in centre square rotations too!!!!

I wouldn’t totally banish the old boys, Curnow, Murphy etc there should be a balance, the youngsters need to develop, they are the ones who will take us significantly further....

As for SPS, his first 2 and half years playing as a mid/forward compared very well with Cotchin’s first few years... SPS had more Brownlow votes at the same stage of their careers.

Cotchin is a champion, however he had issues with his tank and dealing with tags, he wasn’t the finished product in his early years at Richmond, yet

SPS, Dow or Fisher aren’t the finished product yet either, few are this early in their career.

However our three young mids have shown promising signs, who can win their own ball, and since Teague has arrived they’ve been banished from centre square rotations, stalling their development!!!

As for SPS, checkout his stats when played as a mid.... also checkout round 7, 2017 and round 5, 2019, he was brilliant (against serious opposition with excellent, deep midfields), contested possessions/clearances, i50s, tackles, score involvements etc. etc. etc. etc.


Cotchins career started with an achilles injury that kept him from virtually playing any football in his first year, and his second year started a long way behind. No hope of winning Brownlow votes. Carlton supporters let out a sigh of relief we took Kreuzer at No 1, not Cotchin. When Cotchin got on his bike, fit again, he showed us why he was taken at No2, and for some, like me, why he should have been taken at pick No 1.

I really wasn't kind towards Cotchin in his first 2 years, but I was young and silly back then. :wink:

But I understand why you want more time for players we drafted in the positions we drafted them for, and agree.

I'm not as cocky as you with regards to SPS ability.
Allright, he got Brownlow votes on a wet slippery day, and played another 20+ games in the midfield after that and didn't win another vote. Just sayin'.


Cotchin played 15 games in his first year, 10 in his second year... the knock on him as in TAC was his tank, and ability to handle tags... the good thing about watching Cotchin play in the TAC, was I got to see Kruezer play too... :grin:

As for SPS, against the Pies (Round 7 2017) on a wet slippery day:

16 Kicks, 5 Handballs, 21 Disposals, 4 Marks, 2 Goals, 1 Behind, 3 Tackles, 1 Goal Assist, 2 Inside 50s, 3 Clearances,
2 Clangers, 2 Rebound 50s, 10 Contested Disposals, 12 Uncontested Possessions, 15 Effective Disposals, 1 Mark Inside 50,
2 One Percenters, 1 Centre Clearance, 2 Stoppage Clearances, 7 Score Involvements, 312 Metres Gained, 4 Turnovers,
3 Intercepts, 1 Tackle Inside 50, 68% Time on Ground, 3 Brownlow Votes

Dogs (Round 5, 2019), under the roof, on a dry, fast track:

14 Kicks, 21 Handballs, 35 Disposals, 7 Marks, 1 Goals, 1 Behind, 0 Tackles, 0 Goal Assist, 4 Inside 50s, 7 Clearances,
4 Clangers, 2 Rebound 50s, 15 Contested Disposals, 23 Uncontested Possessions, 31 Effective Disposals, 1 Mark Inside 50,
2 One Percenters, 2 Centre Clearance, 5 Stoppage Clearances, 1 Score Involvements, 320 Metres Gained, 1 Turnover,
5 Intercepts, 0 Tackle Inside 50, 85% Time on Ground, 2 Brownlow Votes

You can see the improvement in his numbers...

He hunted the football, he hunted the man, he was creative, he was able to do it in different conditions (in the wet and under the roof), he won his own ball, on the inside/outside... was he the finished product, absolutely not, however he looks lost in the back half, and it's not like we're flush with mids of any age, we have no depth in the midfield, we get consistently run over in games, that might have something to do with the midfield...

All I'm advocating is giving some midfield time to SPS, Dow and Fish to spread the load, continue their development as mids, and to find out what we have...

Maybe all three of our boys are crap, they've all shown good signs as mids so maybe not, either way let's find out, especially since we need lot's of mids!!!

And SPS got Brownlow votes in two other games after the game against the Pies. Just sayin'. :grin:



:thumbsup:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 2:29 pm 
Offline
Banned

Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:55 pm
Posts: 2333
Not all picks are going to make it and not all top 10 picks make it - trade SPS and get what we can for him and hopefully in another environment he does well for his sakes. Like all others I had high hopes but is regressing.. should always do what Geelong do and leave them in reserves for 2-3 years but fear SPS is cooked. Playing kids is all good but run the risk of burning them and the examples are endless from all clubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 2:46 pm 
Offline
Banned

Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:55 pm
Posts: 2333
The cattle Teague has to work with or the 'cake' is pretty solid for next 5-7 years. The known knowns

Backs - Docherty, Weitering, Williamson, Plowman, Marchbank, Newman
Mids - Cripps, Setterfield, Walsh, Kennedy,
Fowards - Charlie, McKay, Silvagni, McGovern (Martin, Gibbons, Fisher, Cunningham - midfield rotation)
Rucks - TDK

Definitely a very good nucleus to work with and some glaring gaps.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:18 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2722
BlueJean wrote:
Does anyone else here find Teague’s voice patronising in his pressers. Perhaps a tad cocky, yet completely unwarranted.
This could be a concern. On the other hand, what you see/hear is what you get with Ratts, which appears to have a positive affect on the winning saints.


No I think he presents well in his "pressers".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25545
Location: Bondi Beach
Blue Sombrero wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2ojJ4sqjqA
Watch this from the 22 minute nark for a while.


You want unstructured footy.

He said words to the effect of:
Structured footy is for white boys. Let the indigenous boys play to their strengths.

I hate structured footy but there is no way to win games now without having a structure.
There is an in between.



I would have preferred more "dirty" ball than bombing it blindly to Moore or Haynes.

With Martin, Betts, Fish, and at times cunners, the ground ball in the forwardline, to no one in particular, they would at least swoop on the ball or put pressure on the defender who gets ball first.

Kicking it high to opposition KPD's effectively terminates the forward thrust.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25545
Location: Bondi Beach
BlueJean wrote:
Does anyone else here find Teague’s voice patronising in his pressers. Perhaps a tad cocky, yet completely unwarranted.
This could be a concern. On the other hand, what you see/hear is what you get with Ratts, which appears to have a positive affect on the winning saints.


No

BUT, because he says the same thing every week, this year, as opposed tolast year where he pointed out situations and made big moves to change the game, I'm finding him monotonous.

He seemd very tired a couple of weeks ago, the day before the Pies game, and came across as arrogant.

Ratten doesn't give away much either...all coaches talk in cliches.

The days where a coach like Blight would single out Pitman the pathetic ruckman are gone. I think the AFLPA hold too much power.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5310 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 ... 266  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group