Synbad wrote:
I really dont get you....
You never have...oh...that was last year!
Synbad wrote:
If Lance was loyal how come we had to keep upping our offer to keep him?
But didn't he drop in pay? I dunno??? You know the pay scales of every player on the list. I thought Whitnall was on $600,000 last year so if "we" were upping our offer he must be on $800,000 or $900,000 per year now right? How much did we "up" the offer, and from what base?
Synbad wrote:
How good do you think Lance was last year?
Third best.
Synbad wrote:
Do you think he was the envy of other clubs or was he great because he was O.K last year after 3 lean seasons??
This line means what? It is false logic. The "lean" seasons are based on what exactly..."potential"???
Synbad wrote:
Which leads me back to low standards set by these blokes swallowed hook line and sinker by supporters who have low standards again.
Again...based on "potential"??? What are you basing your arguement on?? Zip. Zero. Nothing. Crap.
Synbad wrote:
As for Livo.. he isnt pretending to be a champion... hes a guy fighting for his spot.. but at least he is doing everything possible to grab his spot instead of sucking us in with a couple of OK performances and a distant memory of yesteyear.. and a few half a million dollar contracts in succesion...
Ah...so it's whose fault? Have you read anything Bainuzz has written? I'm guessing not. Half a million dollar contracts in succession have nothing to do with the players. All they can do is put out on the field, and the financial market will take care of the rest...get used to it...that is modern football.
Synbad wrote:
Lance will struggle again... he will do ok if other players play the starring roles in the power positions .He will play on the fringe and sometimes slip away..... and some will tell us what a gun he is!!!
And...? Some other players will play good. Others will play shit. Yadee yadee yahdahh. Who signs the pay cheques?