WOW wrote:
The most important things I wanted to see this year was a marked improvement in our second tier running/midfield players such as Dow, O’Brien, Cunningham, Fisher, SPS & Setterfield.
Apart from Setterfield, it just has not eventuated.
Our rebuild will be a failure if they don’t start improving quickly.
If you are going to hang your hat on rebuilding through early and more picks through the draft, then we have failed if these players don’t develop to the standard expected to win premierships.
The MC picked three ins that are ground level players. LOB is an endurance freak with a great left leg. It was obvious to me from the selection that we were going to run the ball through the middle.
Did they use LOB's strengths?
No.
Did they play Gibbo in the mid field where he has played his best footy for us?
No.
Did Eddie have space to move around in in the F50?
No.
So why flowering pick them?
LOB will be dropped because he didn't rack up possessions in a chippy chippy down the line for almost three quarters that doesn't suit his skillset. He had a few possies late and when he took that one hander I said to my wife's uncle,
"This boy is a beautiful kick. This will be a goal."
SPS was back to his 14 metre passes sideways this week except for a few times he tried to penetrate and it came off but he will probably be remembered for getting caught HTB in the last five minutes when he was trying to break the lines.
Willo has such a beautiful left foot but how many times did he use it to create aopportunities through the centre. Even on the TV I could see they are not allowed to do it. Two players alone in the centre of the ground and he just followed the team plan of chippy chippy or long down the boundary.
Where is the team that ran Geelong off its feet?
Where is the team that ran the Dogs ragged?
The expectation of most of us was that a 10-12 finish would be a good result for the year but they showed us in those early games that they had the capacity to beat the good teams and actually make a statement and finish inside the eight. I think that's why we are all so pissed off now is that we know they are good enough, all they have to do is turn up and play four quarters of attacking footy. But they have gone back to the BB/MM game plan that is twenty years out of date. It's OK to do it when you are trying to control the tempo of the game for a few minutes but it should be plan B to stop a five goal run by the other team and not the only way you attack the goals.
I agree with the reference to reverting back to the BB and MM game plan.
We started the season wanting to be fast and daring offensively. Our first 3 quarters against Geelong and our 4 quarter performance against the Dogs really showed this. We made a concerted effort to move the ball quickly and through the corridor. It gave our forwards a chance to score and they delivered.
As the season has progressed, we’ve lost our dare and ability to use the corridor. We’ve been long and slow down the line. By the time the ball gets forward, there’s 20-30 players flooded back into our forward 50. No one kicks goals with this much congestion around. Then we defend too high up the ground so the other team has all the space to run into if they break through our initial line of defence.
I suspect we haven’t been helped by short breaks where players are tired and there’s not much time to train properly, but every other club is in the same position so this isn’t an excuse.
Teague needs to get back to this style of offensive game next year. Train it over pre-season and please bring in some speed and skill into the midfield. Cunners is far from perfect but at least he’s got some break away speed and skill. Get Williams from GWS to play as a speedy midfielder. Get Walshy on the ball full time. Stop playing 3 inside contested midfielders week after week who can’t move the ball quickly