DocSherrin wrote:
Ratten, Kernahan and Gleeson would have been left out of my criteria because when weighed up - their legacy at the club - playing AND non-playing - has done more damage than good.
Pagan/Elshaugh severed the on field leadership continuity at the club by 2004/5.
A continuity that was created in the 1960s - the life blood of the playing culture that was based upon excellence an honesty amongst the players.
Ratten never addressed this critical area as senior coach, and neither did out recruitment and development departments (I doubt that they even knew it was a problem - they probably just expected natural leaders to grow into their roles - they don't. they are hard to find let alone develop)
(not saying Pagan was the sole cause, nor that he did this consciously - just the way it worked out)
And if you couple this with an antiquated, stale and backward looking board then no member should be surprised at how the club has performed and the decisions that it has made over the past decade.
malthouse's biggest challenge is not the game plan or even getting the best out of the playing group. Its to rebuild build a strong leadership culture that has depth and quality.
Not sure he is the person for that role - in any case, that task is a Club responsibility from top to bottom, that includes the players themselves.
I expect us to knock off the Bombers this week, and we will get another 7 days of reprieve for the players who will be satisfied with themselves AGAIN, and the first two week's performances will be forgotten - and will almost certainly be repeated during the year.