Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:31 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2013 10:36 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16949
Location: Melbourne
Siegfried wrote:
he's a forward/ruck who can kick bags, take a strong contested mark and play second ruck..................


I not sure that just because that has been written, it actually makes it true.


Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2013 10:43 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
Cazzesman wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
he's a forward/ruck who can kick bags, take a strong contested mark and play second ruck..................


I not sure that just because that has been written, it actually makes it true.


Regards Cazzesman


You don't rate him Cazz?

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2013 10:52 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Pafloyul wrote:
Punter22 wrote:

I will never, ever regret the Judd trade.

...we have a lot of dead wood on this list and it will be a big broom brought out this October.


You don't think the two points are connected, what planet are you living on? :confused:


Umm... Obviously a different one than you. I'm not sure how having judd on the list has anything to do with list cloggers like Watson, McArthy, Mitchell, I could go on but look at Psych's list above, there isn't a name on there who shouldn't be.

Our mid round drafting has been diabolical, we gave up far too much for Brock and the jury is out on Lucas. How far back do you want to go? The Grigg/Hampson disaster? What a terrible return on 17 & 18.

Never mind the fact that we totally dropped the ball on free agency/list management and put ourselves in a recruiting/trading straight jacket right when smart clubs recognised the need for flexibility. And we did all this right when we decided we needed a new coach and gave him no chance to bring in anyone he might have targeted to help him.

So yeah I'm not sure how Judd had been the puppeteer pulling all of these strings. Maybe i haven't given him enough credit. All I've seen is a great player walk into a mess of a group with no leadership and at least provide a model via example. And I will never forget some of the great moments he delivered, e.g. The 3rd quarter of the final in Sydney, the win in Sydney on Friday night a couple of years ago, and of course the look on Eddies face when Juddy won the brownlow. I wouldn't trade that (and Armfield) for Kennedy, Palmer and whatever spud Hughes would have stuffed up #20 with.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2013 11:16 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Vardy wont be going anywhere.....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2013 11:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
WOW wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I look at Jack Watts and think that's what would have become of JK had he stayed here without a leader like Juddy around.

what of all the others that were around when a leader like judd WAS around???

I shudder to think.

In short
Us without Judd = Melbourne now

No doubt in my mind.


There's no doubt in my mind that some of you are factoring in Carlton being shite as a given. If that sort of self fulfilling logic permeates at the club itself then it's no wonder things have turned out the way they have.

Having Judd at the club has meant that we keep putting off making the tough decisions. Whether that was a given, I don't know but it was predictable. I do know that we were in no position at the time to be pinning all our hopes on just one player. We never rebuilt our list to where it needed to be and that's the tragedy.


Don't agree

Judd had nothing to do with our recent poor recruiting or lack of player development. We have had ample opportunity to rebuild our list through early draft picks and additional resources. Simply not good enough

Handing over valuable picks of 17 & 19 for Grigg and Hampson are good examples of poor recruiting

I am confident we would be in a worse position now if Judd had never come to the club. We were a basket case in 2007. At least now there is a foundation for Mick to work from.

Can you list the average players and spuds who were picked after pick 16?

Don't be a hindsight hero and point to the better players.

The players we really missed out on were Josh Kennedy and Tom Hawkins who were picked under the F/S rule.

It wasn't a super draft like many predicted.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2013 11:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
But we didnt know that anyway.. and we wont know what is the outcome when we do it again will we on that logic???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 12:10 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Kouta wrote:


Can you list the average players and spuds who were picked after pick 16?

Don't be a hindsight hero and point to the better players.

The players we really missed out on were Josh Kennedy and Tom Hawkins who were picked under the F/S rule.

It wasn't a super draft like many predicted.


That's a reasonable point Kouta. Not wanting to turn this into the 34549th thread on Hughes' recruiting record, but Grigg and Hampson fit the Hughes mould of not taking 'football' players. He seemed to love picking players based on a specific physical trait, rather than basics like, does he have a brain, can he kick, mark and handball, that sort of thing.

Anyway, none of this gets away from the point that having Judd on the list had nothing to do with these picks and the seeming reluctance to move them on quickly once it becomes obvious (to everyone outside of our club it seems) that these players aren't going to be players in a premiership contending team.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 5:47 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
ColourMan wrote:
AGRO wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
AGRO wrote:
If we had given West Coast Bower (who they asked for first instead of Kennedy) we would have been miles in front.


I don't think that's correct AGRO. West Coast were never interested in Paul Bower.


My memory was that we offered them Pick 3 & Pick 20 and they said they wanted a player as well and asked for Bower, we said no and then blinked and said OK you can have Kennedy. But happy to stand corrected.


The Judd camp made it perfectly clear to Carlton that picks 3 & 20 were sufficient compensation.

The Ablett compensation proved that to be correct; we ignored that advice... :banghead:


Pretty hard to ignore something that was 3 years away from happening.

The Ablett compensation is clearly a different set of circumstances. If Geelong had traded him on the open market they'd have got much much more than 2 first round picks.

Remember how Nick Stevens ended up at Carlton and not Collingwood? Thats a much more relevant example than the Ablett scenario.

Wasnt aware the Judd camp were valuing trades. I think what West Coast wanted is a little more relevant.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 8:53 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14729
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Nah Judd is in control of everything

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 9:02 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
DenimUndies wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Handshakes has had a solid year to date, started strongly and his quieter games by his new standard have also still been solid.. ..and he's a smart footballer, this lack of pace is a myth, it holds true when he's not fit.. ..but running well, he gets plenty of time and space.. .... ..and a more open game actually ties into this for him.. ..interchange cap only further strengthens his running ability...


His pace is not a myth, he is very very slow!!


his perceived value remains whilst he can maintain sustained but slow running, if his knees get to the point where he cant sustain prolonged running then even his perceived value is gone. let him go to an interstate club where he can at least have a chance to play 1st ruck each week and give us a gun midfielder ( if there is one out there) win win... without going over old ground, i think we erred in taking him over cotchin, i suspect even you would take cotchin now in exchange for Kruiz, but also sure no club would swap cotchin for Kruiz today. end of story


..not sure if you quoted by mistake, but my thoughts on handshakes are about brock..

..but anyways, regarding krooz.. -- ..he seems over the knee injuries, i can't remember there being any talk of them being degenerative.. ..in fact, this year all season he hasnt had any strapping on them at all.. ..last season he reinjured them, and we played him for most of the season thru it.. ..thats bad club player management, not a knock on him.. ..if a club ruins a player, its hardly the player's fault.. ..ratts tried to save his career, and could have stuffed krooz up.. ..crazy thinking from club level..

..yes, cotchin is a good player.. ..would i, in todays time reverse the draft and pick him over krooz?, no.. ..some may scoff, but i'd still take krooz.. ..your ruckman is an integral part of the team, more important than 1 individual midfielder.. ..they contest the very first action, they set the standard and attitude.. ..a physical ruck is a big part of every prem team..

..top class mids are available every year, flag worthy rucks are not.. ..cotchin is good, but he's no judd/ablett.. ..and i reckon if you asked cotchin, he'd love to rove to krooz every week.. ..the acl set back krooz's development by at least 2 yrs.. ..on top of which. mids will develop quicker than talls anyway..

..it's interesting to note how many supporters under-rate Krooz, and yet ex-players can't talk highly enough of him..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 9:04 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Synbad wrote:
AGRO wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
Young Menzel looks to be working on the Megan replacement from what I saw on Facebook ;-)


Wow that would be an 18 year age difference, way to go Megan!!!

:eek: :razz: :wink:

is it me or the older megan gets the more she looks like a horse... i reckon she likes sugar


..must be you, i reckon she's getting better every year.. ..she's a bit of an amazon, she can wear the wonder woman costume any time she likes..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 9:05 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
i dont even see kruze as a ruckman only i see him as a top shelf big man.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 9:08 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Synbad wrote:
i dont even see kruze as a ruckman only i see him as a top shelf big man.


..ditto.. ..he's top shelf, i agree.. ..and as many would say, you go the good big man before the good small man..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 9:12 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
i reckon the only thing kreuze misses is a good leap.

he has everything else.. hes ahead of most big guys in most other cataguories.

not a big jumper though.. but very good at ground level.. and the marking will come.
it started to come on the weekend... he wills himself

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 9:17 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..his jump is ok.. ..yes it's not a big leap like nicnat or hampson, but not many are.. ..but he's average for a ruck.. ..last year his ability to jump was hampered, this year he's been jumping well in marking contests and also center bounces.. ..it's more about timing, which he's getting back.. ..marked well vs port, starting to mark the ball at the highest point like he used to do pre-acl..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 9:51 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35876
Location: Half back flank
Synbad wrote:
is it me or the older megan gets the more she looks like a horse... i reckon she likes sugar



:eek:


Image

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 4:10 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Theory at the start of the year was 2 out of 3 of Walker, Kreuzer and Robinson.

Walker's form and versatility makes him hard to dislodge. Don't think they'd have the guts to trade Kreuzer whilst he's still playing halfway decent footy.

I expect them to panic and trade Hampson for next to nothing with less than 24 hrs to go in trade week, reminiscent of the Jacobs trade, and instead of picking up a speculative, young ruck in the rookie draft, we'll pick a 30 year old 191cm VFL journeyman....or Orren Stephenson at his third club in three years.......nine years after we decided he wasn't good enough for the Pagan era.

The draft, no matter how good it's first 20-30 may be, is never going to be deep enough to accomodate 12-14 list changes, and we're going to need to take a gamble on some speculatives from other clubs being better than the speculative status quo. Wouldn't mind a look at Tapscott. Wonder what Brisbane would want for Polec. I'm sure we'll hear another year of rumours of recruiting Lachie Hansen..

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 4:17 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24634
Location: Kaloyasena
Synbad wrote:
i reckon the only thing kreuze misses is a good leap.

he has everything else.. hes ahead of most big guys in most other cataguories.

not a big jumper though.. but very good at ground level.. and the marking will come.
it started to come on the weekend... he wills himself


He wasn't a huge jumper before his knee injury and definitely lost a bit of spring after it and with the other leg injuries he had during his rehab and on his return - saw glimpses of his former leap coming back to him in the NAB Cup - but not quite there yet.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 4:44 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
The day WC's haul started to go past the CFC haul was always going to come

But in saying that, we do need to remember Armfield is becoming a little ripper of a player for us

Look Judd's value was two-fold ...

- members, sponsors, just gave us belief, optimism, energy
- his professionalism no doubt rubbed off on teammates, and arguably also impacted on our ability to recruit eg: 206


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2013 10:08 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
TruBlueBrad wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
AGRO wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
AGRO wrote:
If we had given West Coast Bower (who they asked for first instead of Kennedy) we would have been miles in front.


I don't think that's correct AGRO. West Coast were never interested in Paul Bower.


My memory was that we offered them Pick 3 & Pick 20 and they said they wanted a player as well and asked for Bower, we said no and then blinked and said OK you can have Kennedy. But happy to stand corrected.


The Judd camp made it perfectly clear to Carlton that picks 3 & 20 were sufficient compensation.

The Ablett compensation proved that to be correct; we ignored that advice... :banghead:


Pretty hard to ignore something that was 3 years away from happening.

The Ablett compensation is clearly a different set of circumstances. If Geelong had traded him on the open market they'd have got much much more than 2 first round picks. Judd wasn't on the open market!

Remember how Nick Stevens ended up at Carlton and not Collingwood? Thats a much more relevant example than the Ablett scenario.
Agreed, if WC didn't accept 3 & 20 they would have got nothing... Judd would have put a price on his head Richmond couldn't afford, the Tiges were penniless at the time...

Wasnt aware the Judd camp were valuing trades. I think what West Coast wanted is a little more relevant.
Now you are aware... We wanted a 1st rounder for Jacobs, yet received Adelaide's 3rd selection that draft while the Tigers received heaps more Tambling... From a position of strength we reamed ourselves :banghead:


That concludes "Trading for Dummies 101".

Anything else you want explained?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group