Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 7:40 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:07 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
AGRO wrote:
Juanita Jones wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
Hard to make too much out of a side with so many key players out. However, what I've been wanting to see this year is more system going forward. Last year it was mostly bomb it forward, hope someone takes a mark, and if they don't, hope the crumbers pounce. It worked a treat against most sides, because Betts and Garlett are so dangerous, but against the top 4 especially, we got found out by strong, well disciplined backlines. Hence our struggle to kick decent scores against the top teams.

Bearing in mind that Waite and Walker didn't play, I haven't seen much so far to indicate that has changed, which is disappointing. A couple of passes to Hampson on the lead was about it. Time will tell of course, but if we are to seriously challenge, we need to get leading forward options happening.

Re Carazzo...when he's in our bottom 6 of our starting 22, we'll win a flag (he is definitely good enough to be in our best 22).

Dale will bea player. You can tell already, he has something.


Hard to see a system in place with half the team out and those that were in the team, most will unlikely play too many games this year.




Sorry Juanita - but a system is a system is a system.

If our coaches are working on system and structures then our players should be playing to it regardless.

We are a "Top 4" side now - no excuses.

Good teams play to their systems and structures and younger/new players should be playing to them.

This is what separates average/mediocre teams from good teams - young players come in and play their role to the team system/structure.

We are a "Top 4" side now - no excuses.


Agree with this Agro. A couple of times over the last few years I have noticed teams that were well drilled (Collingwood and Sydney come to mind) have young forwards come in when players were injured and slot straight into their 'system'. They knew where to lead to, what their role was. I just haven't seen that with us, not even from our senior players. I fear that until we can develop that, we'll remain off the pace.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:24 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
AGRO wrote:
Juanita Jones wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
Hard to make too much out of a side with so many key players out. However, what I've been wanting to see this year is more system going forward. Last year it was mostly bomb it forward, hope someone takes a mark, and if they don't, hope the crumbers pounce. It worked a treat against most sides, because Betts and Garlett are so dangerous, but against the top 4 especially, we got found out by strong, well disciplined backlines. Hence our struggle to kick decent scores against the top teams.

Bearing in mind that Waite and Walker didn't play, I haven't seen much so far to indicate that has changed, which is disappointing. A couple of passes to Hampson on the lead was about it. Time will tell of course, but if we are to seriously challenge, we need to get leading forward options happening.

Re Carazzo...when he's in our bottom 6 of our starting 22, we'll win a flag (he is definitely good enough to be in our best 22).

Dale will bea player. You can tell already, he has something.


Hard to see a system in place with half the team out and those that were in the team, most will unlikely play too many games this year.




Sorry Juanita - but a system is a system is a system.

If our coaches are working on system and structures then our players should be playing to it regardless.

We are a "Top 4" side now - no excuses.

Good teams play to their systems and structures and younger/new players should be playing to them.

This is what separates average/mediocre teams from good teams - young players come in and play their role to the team system/structure.

We are a "Top 4" side now - no excuses.


Agree with this Agro. A couple of times over the last few years I have noticed teams that were well drilled (Collingwood and Sydney come to mind) have young forwards come in when players were injured and slot straight into their 'system'. They knew where to lead to, what their role was. I just haven't seen that with us, not even from our senior players. I fear that until we can develop that, we'll remain off the pace.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:38 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Siegfried wrote:
Agree with this Agro. A couple of times over the last few years I have noticed teams that were well drilled (Collingwood and Sydney come to mind) have young forwards come in when players were injured and slot straight into their 'system'. They knew where to lead to, what their role was. I just haven't seen that with us, not even from our senior players. I fear that until we can develop that, we'll remain off the pace.

That's bull. Dawes was hot and cold in a 2009 match against Carlton. Look at how Dawes played in his fourth season. It took Anthony three seasons to break into their side and kick 50 goals. Only for Dawes to go past Anthony after he was worked out. This suggests that a good structure can make a spud or average player look like a very good player.

Rowe has been at Carlton for all of five minutes.

Good to see the supporters who heckled Henderson at a Hawthorn game two years ago are up and about again.

The flogs shut up after he kicked three goals in the second half.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:02 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
Donstuie wrote:
jim wrote:
Nothing's changed my mind yet on our KP forward roles in the short term. Thornton CHF, Waite FF. Rowe will take a few weeks to get his fitness back up after injury an while Casboult, I beiieve, will make it one day, is still getting there. The ruckman will be very dangerous resting where they won't get the same attention of the KP players hence can run straight at the ball when going for a mark. Their output will be diminished though if played in the KP. Too hard to ruck then try to be the key focal point forward.

The problem with our KP forwards last year (and likely this year too, looking how our early injury-fortunes have gone) is that since Fev's been gone, we've never been able to settle anyone into a prolonged spell in ONE position. We've always been left to patch up holes elsewhere, which robs our talls of any continuity whatsoever. Waite, Walker, Warnock, Kreuz, Hendo, Thornton, Hammer have ALL had interrupted spells themselves, or been moved around because we've had a hole to fill somewhere else. It's no wonder we can't establish a genuine key forward, because none get to play in one spot long enough, and when one does look to have turned the corner they get injured. Now with Waite, Jamo, Laidler, Mitchell, Duigan and Warnock already under clouds before a ball a bounced in anger, the cycle may just repeat again.


Must admit I assumed alot re: injuries.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
Went to the game and while it is always better to win, I walked away reasonably satisfied, given how far short of full-strength we were as compared to them. We had about half of our side out, them 2-3 players and we got pipped with less than a minute to go. I would be more worried if I were a Bulldogs supporter than a Carlton one.

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:07 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 9061
Location: Melbourne
I wouldn't be worried if I was a Carlton supporter or a dogs supporter because it's nab cup and it's meaningless. All that can be gathered from these games IMO is the improvement in young and fringe players. We won this thing twice a couple of years back and we all know how that turned out.

That said, my take from the game:
-Hampson, the most exciting thing to come of the preseason so far. Still very raw but I really think he can offer something as a key forward this year. A few good games and a bit of confidence will help a lot, as will having Waite and walker back to take some of the heat. But the glimpses of what he can do are there, as they were in round 1 last year. If he can get it together would be a nightmare match up for opposition coaches with his size and speed.

Curnow, very positive, looks to be fit again and if he can recapture his form from early last season we will be a much better side. Fit and firing, I have him above both Brock and ellard.

Hendo, was very good after a slow start and looks to be picking up where he left off last season. Hendo and jamo are easily good enough KPPs to build a premiership defence around, keeping them both on the park is the challenge

Yarran, just wow. My favourite player in the league to watch. This boy is very, very special and could be absolutely anything.

Scotland and Simmo will give us the same this year as they always do. All heart and extremely underrated outside the club.

Eddie set for another big year and 40+ goals

I liked a lot of what I saw from Levi. Still a way off but he has something. I'd like to see the club give him as long as possible.

Laidler is really important let's hope it's not too bad. Just so reliable.

Lucas was barely sighted which was a surprise. Expecting a massive year from him.

A lot of the senior players still seemed to be in second gear for much of the game and I don't really have a problem with that, provided they come out fired up round 1.

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:02 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
AGRO wrote:
Ponkstar wrote:
Craig Bradley was pretty soft and I wouldn't have changed him for the world.



One of the biggest misconceptions of all time. :wink:

If you call getting bashed from pillar to post being soft then Bradley was soft.

If you call belting players around the head a la Neil Balme 1973 Grand Final tough then Bradley was soft.

If you call running until you puked, and taking many many during a game of football tough then he was a very very tough player. :wink:

And if you call getting three Brownlow votes with a broken rib in your 375th (and last) AFL game at age 38 soft, then Bradley was soft.

And if you call sitting at a keyboard taking swipes at tough club legends soft, then...........

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1654
No news on Laidler? (bl@$dy etihad)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
The Club's official Twitter and Facebook pages have stated "up to 6 weeks".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:41 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1654
Thanks snickers. Good luck in your recovery laids. Ok bower, here's your chance....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:54 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35883
Location: Half back flank
So up to 12 weeks then.

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:06 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: Perth
moshe25 wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Ponkstar wrote:
Craig Bradley was pretty soft and I wouldn't have changed him for the world.



One of the biggest misconceptions of all time. :wink:

If you call getting bashed from pillar to post being soft then Bradley was soft.

If you call belting players around the head a la Neil Balme 1973 Grand Final tough then Bradley was soft.

If you call running until you puked, and taking many many during a game of football tough then he was a very very tough player. :wink:

And if you call getting three Brownlow votes with a broken rib in your 375th (and last) AFL game at age 38 soft, then Bradley was soft.

And if you call sitting at a keyboard taking swipes at tough club legends soft, then...........


Seriously? Yes, ok, I admit it, I am a gutless keyboard warrior.

Anyway... With that sorted...

The point I was trying to make was that Bradley was never an in & under player or one to make suicide ruins into packs but was still one of the best you'll ever see. My point was that it takes all types to make a successful side. Making suicide runs into packs Ken Hunter style will never be Yarran's gig but he, like Bradley, has something special that very few players will ever have.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:04 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
Suprised no one has mentioned the chasing and tackling applied by Garlett Betts and Yarren

Betts appears quicker to me and for such a little bloke Garlett lays a lot of tackles and is always chasing

some of Yarrens efforts were a sight for sore eyes

hope they keep it up

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:26 am 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 284
jake_h03 wrote:
I wouldn't be worried if I was a Carlton supporter or a dogs supporter because it's nab cup and it's meaningless. All that can be gathered from these games IMO is the improvement in young and fringe players. We won this thing twice a couple of years back and we all know how that turned out.

That said, my take from the game:
-Hampson, the most exciting thing to come of the preseason so far. Still very raw but I really think he can offer something as a key forward this year. A few good games and a bit of confidence will help a lot, as will having Waite and walker back to take some of the heat. But the glimpses of what he can do are there, as they were in round 1 last year. If he can get it together would be a nightmare match up for opposition coaches with his size and speed.

Curnow, very positive, looks to be fit again and if he can recapture his form from early last season we will be a much better side. Fit and firing, I have him above both Brock and ellard.

Hendo, was very good after a slow start and looks to be picking up where he left off last season. Hendo and jamo are easily good enough KPPs to build a premiership defence around, keeping them both on the park is the challenge

Yarran, just wow. My favourite player in the league to watch. This boy is very, very special and could be absolutely anything.

Scotland and Simmo will give us the same this year as they always do. All heart and extremely underrated outside the club.

Eddie set for another big year and 40+ goals

I liked a lot of what I saw from Levi. Still a way off but he has something. I'd like to see the club give him as long as possible.

Laidler is really important let's hope it's not too bad. Just so reliable.

Lucas was barely sighted which was a surprise. Expecting a massive year from him.

A lot of the senior players still seemed to be in second gear for much of the game and I don't really have a problem with that, provided they come out fired up round 1.


THANK YOU JAKE! I was reading through the forum getting more and more annoyed at the generally negative tone and the stupidity of much of it. I wish I had the energy to respond to much of the negative stuff but life's too short to get drawn into it. I agree wholeheartedly with every one of your points above. Thanks for bringing a little perspective.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group