Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 3:59 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 173 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:03 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Sugarcane wrote:
Anyhow, Garlett was terrible tonight and that is the point, when is he going to mature and grow up on the football field?


Jeff turned 22 a month ago.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:04 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
CK95 wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:
Garlett I am pretty sure hasn't played a final yet, has been dropped on the eve of the Elim Final 2 yrs running. After his pitiful effort tonite, characterised by blind handballs and playing on when he should go back and take the set shot (er, Ess draw, Fletcher anyone!!!!) you'd be tempted to drop his ass again

Seriously, he, Betts and Walks need to pull their digits out. If they fail again next week we will lose, simple as that.




He played against sydney last year


And against Brisbane in 09 but who's counting? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:05 am 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
gerry atric wrote:
Strangely I don't feel that disappointed, however sides with real intent make a statement on the eve of the finals and play the way they intend to next week. Having been confident we would beat the Saints on the way to the prelim I now feel we see next week as and end in itself rather than a means to an end and we have become a mediocre club that finds adversity to be a convenient excuse, rather than using it as an opportunity for the club to show strength.

Having said that ....some excuses. Losing Big K virtually from the start of the game left our ruck strength as a weakness. Setanta looked very likely up forward but had to spend half his time and lots of energy trudging around the ruck contests.
Warnock is a good knock ruckman and nothing else. Our MC seem to have been looking backwards instead of forwards when they went so hard for him. He is okay but gives you nothing outside of knockouts, so his knockouts have to be super effective to make up for that which is impossible most times with the crowd around the ball. Certainly has had an inferior season to Sammy J.

Tuohy was terrific, Duigan and Laidler very good. Simmo good and Robbo showed the sort of desperation we want from all our players.
Hendo another superb defensive game. He is a defender and will take and beat Hurley next week.
Yarran sublime, but sometimes too cool for school, sometimes you just have to hack it towards the line - like the play leading up to Schneider's last qtr goal.
Eddie and Jeffy - for about an hour of the game it was hard to believe they were playing.
Can we have a team rule that anyone who marks within kicking distance goes back and kicks the goal, what the hell was Garlett thinking, he had a man a metre from him and a mark at the top of the square.
AJ solid again but his lack of skill catches him - not sure he's the future and not sure I would be offering him 2 more years.
Davies I thought did okay in an unfamiliar position and on Fisher, but why would you pick a medium defender as sub? I would have thought a sub should be someone whose attributes are exaggerated when fresh late in games - ie a speedster who is harder to catch when players are tired, or a tall who is more effective when the pace has slowed and defenders can't leap as high. Maybe we have just run out of players.
Can see why JR has struggled for a game, hard to believe he is the same player from last year
Let's hope Hammo has a blinder for the Ants tomorrow
It's starting to feel like the last two years again. If we lose next week we will have a welter of excuses, and Ratts will get an extension, but he shouldn't. Winning next week makes the season a bare pass and should be essential for his future. Winning next week and then losing to WCE shouldn't be seen as a step forward.


Agreed on most of it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:05 am 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:09 am
Posts: 497
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
I missed the lot tonight, out at dinner.

Can someone give me a rational assessment of the night? Perhaps not.


yep.

we went in to the game not really caring if we won or not, meant nothing
st kilda went in wanting to win
despite this we played all over them for 3 qtrs, but didnt convert it on the scoreboard
it was really wierd football.
it was almost as though we had other things on our mind, like Essendon*
Then saints got a bit of run on due to some pretty nice coaching from Lyon and hit the front, then we stuffed up some ridiculous opportunities to goal (jeffy, and davies poster, and setants miss on the left come to mind) then seemed to just turn off altogether for about 15 mins, the aints kicked a few more, and the siren went.

felt like I was watching a practice match, or intra-club game

we dont seem to kick any goals from 50 out or futher anymore, hardly even 45.
would love to see the stats on this.
if u asked me who I'd have kicking after the siren from 45 out directly in front for my life, I honestly wouldnt have a clue. I'd almost say Ratts


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:09 am 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
aramari wrote:
CK95 wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:
Garlett I am pretty sure hasn't played a final yet, has been dropped on the eve of the Elim Final 2 yrs running. After his pitiful effort tonite, characterised by blind handballs and playing on when he should go back and take the set shot (er, Ess draw, Fletcher anyone!!!!) you'd be tempted to drop his ass again

Seriously, he, Betts and Walks need to pull their digits out. If they fail again next week we will lose, simple as that.




He played against sydney last year


And against Brisbane in 09 but who's counting? :lol:


Ha sorry I have that totally incorrect, it was Yarran who hasn't played a final yet
Funny how 3 years after being drafted it is the no.6 draft pick who has become among our top 5 players now :idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:16 am 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:
Anyhow, Garlett was terrible tonight and that is the point, when is he going to mature and grow up on the football field?


Jeff turned 22 a month ago.


Then why is he still playing like a 16 year old??

Didn't he learn from the Ess balls up??

Go back and take the set shot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:18 am 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
AGRO wrote:
I think the cue was put in the rack early in the third quarter - when it was clear that St. Kilda would not die wondering trying to win the game and secure a home final.

Dont forget Round 22 in 2001 - when Geelong with nothing to play for spiflicated our finals chances with Porter and Silvagni being concussed and Ratten doing an elbow.

We just needed a good hitout tonight - we had one in the first half and did what we had to do.

Saw some great signs from Lucas and Russell - which will add something to our mid-field grunt come finals time, liked Tuohy's game as well - Duigan and Laidler were sensational against the odds - we just need to make sure we structure properly against Essendon* and play 4 quarters of clean and composed football.


so you're happy we will go into the finals not having won a game in 4 weeks ??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:20 am 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:09 am
Posts: 497
I personally cannot wait for sunday. I lost no confidence after tonight (and I actually didnt expect us to win anyway)
I think after #17 and #23 performance tonight, and having #40 rested to be cherry ripe, and the potential that #22 has a blinder tomorrow for the Ants, then what I've waited and worried about all year NOT HAVING A FIT AND FIRING SPINE is now not a worry.

Cant wait for love this time next sunday being thrown around TC, it will be the biggest outspread of joy and happiness this site has EVER seen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:22 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:42 pm
Posts: 155
Location: Here
Sugarcane wrote:
RickJ wrote:
Just back from the game.

We were absolutely dominant in the first half, ran them off their legs, and were just playing with them. Should have been 8 goals up at half time. Statistitically at that stage it was one of the most lopsided games of the season!

Lyon completely outcoached Ratts after the break, closing down space, clogging our forward line, and then rebounding for easy goals.

Should have been an easy win the way the game was going, but we just froze after half time, lost all our run, and resorted to static chip passes to easy tartgets until we inevitably turned it over.

St Kilda were very ordinary. Right up until midway through the final quarter I thought we'd ramp it up and come home victorious. But we just couldnt get our run back. Looked tired.

Very disappointing on the eve of the finals. No momentum and fragile.

Simpson unbelievable, clearly BOG. Tuohy, Laidler, Murphy, and Henderson all very good, despite he latter gifting two easy goals to the Saints with incredibly poor judgement and lack of basic football nous. Davies not up to it.

More disappointed than I should be I think.


Steady on mate. We outplayed them early but 8 gls is an overstatement.

Maybe we should have been 4-5 gls ahead, but not 8

Nup - we were literally having our way with them in the first half & 8 goals is not overstating it at all. They were slow, inefficient & putrid, we were clean, clinical, quick & brilliant......except in front of goal (yet again). As others have said, the enforced subbing-off of Kreuzer was the game changer......the whole dynamic of the team fell apart after that & we just didn't have the structure to overcome it. Did we put the cue in the rack during the 3rd when things started looking dire? Seriously - none of us can truthfully answer that.......maybe some players did (that'd wanna be the excuse of Betts & Garlett), maybe they didn't - Simmo certainly didn't, nor did Henderson (has Riewoldt ever been so systematically obliterated? Henderson has set the new AFL benchmark for playing on this guy). There was good & bad to come out of this game, but let's not repeat it next week thanks Blues.

A good 2nd half against the Hawks, a good 1st half against the 'Aints.....maybe next week we can actually string 2 halves together?

Win next week Swans & you will forever hold a special place in my heart......

_________________
Football is life: there is nothing else


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:24 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24634
Location: Kaloyasena
Sugarcane wrote:
AGRO wrote:
I think the cue was put in the rack early in the third quarter - when it was clear that St. Kilda would not die wondering trying to win the game and secure a home final.

Dont forget Round 22 in 2001 - when Geelong with nothing to play for spiflicated our finals chances with Porter and Silvagni being concussed and Ratten doing an elbow.

We just needed a good hitout tonight - we had one in the first half and did what we had to do.

Saw some great signs from Lucas and Russell - which will add something to our mid-field grunt come finals time, liked Tuohy's game as well - Duigan and Laidler were sensational against the odds - we just need to make sure we structure properly against Essendon* and play 4 quarters of clean and composed football.


so you're happy we will go into the finals not having won a game in 4 weeks ??



Im not ecstatic - but I think we will be frying a very big snapper next Sunday afternoon.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:30 am 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Brettie wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:
RickJ wrote:
Just back from the game.

We were absolutely dominant in the first half, ran them off their legs, and were just playing with them. Should have been 8 goals up at half time. Statistitically at that stage it was one of the most lopsided games of the season!

Lyon completely outcoached Ratts after the break, closing down space, clogging our forward line, and then rebounding for easy goals.

Should have been an easy win the way the game was going, but we just froze after half time, lost all our run, and resorted to static chip passes to easy tartgets until we inevitably turned it over.

St Kilda were very ordinary. Right up until midway through the final quarter I thought we'd ramp it up and come home victorious. But we just couldnt get our run back. Looked tired.

Very disappointing on the eve of the finals. No momentum and fragile.

Simpson unbelievable, clearly BOG. Tuohy, Laidler, Murphy, and Henderson all very good, despite he latter gifting two easy goals to the Saints with incredibly poor judgement and lack of basic football nous. Davies not up to it.

More disappointed than I should be I think.


Steady on mate. We outplayed them early but 8 gls is an overstatement.

Maybe we should have been 4-5 gls ahead, but not 8

Nup - we were literally having our way with them in the first half & 8 goals is not overstating it at all. They were slow, inefficient & putrid, we were clean, clinical, quick & brilliant......except in front of goal (yet again). As others have said, the enforced subbing-off of Kreuzer was the game changer......the whole dynamic of the team fell apart after that & we just didn't have the structure to overcome it. Did we put the cue in the rack during the 3rd when things started looking dire? Seriously - none of us can truthfully answer that.......maybe some players did (that'd wanna be the excuse of Betts & Garlett), maybe they didn't - Simmo certainly didn't, nor did Henderson (has Riewoldt ever been so systematically obliterated? Henderson has set the new AFL benchmark for playing on this guy). There was good & bad to come out of this game, but let's not repeat it next week thanks Blues.

A good 2nd half against the Hawks, a good 1st half against the 'Aints.....maybe next week we can actually string 2 halves together?

Win next week Swans & you will forever hold a special place in my heart......


13 to 7 shots on goal at half time, and you think we should have been 8 gls ahead :lol:

Assume we kicked reasonably well and had 7.6 at half time, and they had 4.4, that is just over 3 gls ahead

8 gls ahead is judst dreamland mate, dreamland

Did you ever stop to consider the reason played keepings off is bec we didn;t have faith in a Waite and Kruezer less fwdline and bec St.K flooded back? So where does the 8 extra gls come from? Oh that's right dreamland.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:33 am 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
AGRO wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:
AGRO wrote:
I think the cue was put in the rack early in the third quarter - when it was clear that St. Kilda would not die wondering trying to win the game and secure a home final.

Dont forget Round 22 in 2001 - when Geelong with nothing to play for spiflicated our finals chances with Porter and Silvagni being concussed and Ratten doing an elbow.

We just needed a good hitout tonight - we had one in the first half and did what we had to do.

Saw some great signs from Lucas and Russell - which will add something to our mid-field grunt come finals time, liked Tuohy's game as well - Duigan and Laidler were sensational against the odds - we just need to make sure we structure properly against Essendon* and play 4 quarters of clean and composed football.


so you're happy we will go into the finals not having won a game in 4 weeks ??



Im not ecstatic - but I think we will be frying a very big snapper next Sunday afternoon.


Ha like your reply, nice work mate
Look I think we should be favourites, if for nothing else than we belted this mob not long ago
But going into a final not winning a game for a month aint good in anyones language


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:37 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
Laguna Legend wrote:
I personally cannot wait for sunday. I lost no confidence after tonight (and I actually didnt expect us to win anyway)
I think after #17 and #23 performance tonight, and having #40 rested to be cherry ripe, and the potential that #22 has a blinder tomorrow for the Ants, then what I've waited and worried about all year NOT HAVING A FIT AND FIRING SPINE is now not a worry.

Cant wait for love this time next sunday being thrown around TC, it will be the biggest outspread of joy and happiness this site has EVER seen.


I think we'll win next week but if you think we don't desperately miss reliable marking targets at CHF and up the wings :eek:

Warnock's ineptitude, Hampson's injury and marking semi-eptitude :oops: Kreuzer's poor form and fitness, and most importantly, no Jarrad Waite are massive concerns, and will very likely see our season end in the next fortnight.

Hendo has covered for Jamo very well major props to him there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:40 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:42 pm
Posts: 155
Location: Here
Sugarcane wrote:
Brettie wrote:
Sugarcane wrote:
Steady on mate. We outplayed them early but 8 gls is an overstatement.

Maybe we should have been 4-5 gls ahead, but not 8

Nup - we were literally having our way with them in the first half & 8 goals is not overstating it at all. They were slow, inefficient & putrid, we were clean, clinical, quick & brilliant......except in front of goal (yet again). As others have said, the enforced subbing-off of Kreuzer was the game changer......the whole dynamic of the team fell apart after that & we just didn't have the structure to overcome it. Did we put the cue in the rack during the 3rd when things started looking dire? Seriously - none of us can truthfully answer that.......maybe some players did (that'd wanna be the excuse of Betts & Garlett), maybe they didn't - Simmo certainly didn't, nor did Henderson (has Riewoldt ever been so systematically obliterated? Henderson has set the new AFL benchmark for playing on this guy). There was good & bad to come out of this game, but let's not repeat it next week thanks Blues.

A good 2nd half against the Hawks, a good 1st half against the 'Aints.....maybe next week we can actually string 2 halves together?

Win next week Swans & you will forever hold a special place in my heart......


13 to 7 shots on goal at half time, and you think we should have been 8 gls ahead :lol:

Assume we kicked reasonably well and had 7.6 at half time, and they had 4.4, that is just over 3 gls ahead

8 gls ahead is judst dreamland mate, dreamland

Did you ever stop to consider the reason played keepings off is bec we didn;t have faith in a Waite and Kruezer less fwdline and bec St.K flooded back? So where does the 8 extra gls come from? Oh that's right dreamland.

Oh - so it's all about scoring shots & nothing else, fair enough, didn't realise what the hard & fast rules were....thanks for the heads-up, you rock :thumbsup:

_________________
Football is life: there is nothing else


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:48 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13397
Location: Melbourne
Really hard game to work out. OK first half, rubbish second half.

You have to wonder how switched on a team will be when they're essentially playing for nothing vs a team playing for a certain spot. And yes, I know the Hawks and Eagles won, but they were playing much lower ranked teams also only playing for pride.

Garlett choosing to play on was fine - his actual kick was not. He just stabbed at the ball aiming for a dribble through the goals. If he'd aimed for level 2 or 3 it would have been a goal.

Laidler was excellent tonight. Henderson also very good although he coughed up 2 goals but one of them was not really his fault. Big Tant was great considering he was forced to cover for the loss of MK.

Umpiring was questionable at times. The advantage rule is useless.

Struggled after losing MK, but having to sub a player out so early has affected us every time we've done it this year. Fingers crossed whatever is up with his foot is minor.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 1:07 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14729
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Hendo made a couple mistakes, but he and a fully fit Jamo could develop into some kind of key defensive pair. I hope, if he makes it back into the forward line, that he attacks with the same verve he's shown at CHB. Has looked a much more dynamic player back there IMO

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 1:43 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 5245
Read the first page and shook my head, are you people for real? It was so god damn obvious we weren't trying after half time with next week on our minds...just look at the body language of Irish and the team when he kicked his 4th to bring it back to 12 with plenty of time..nobody even came to pump him up and he didn't even celebrate at all.the players did not go all out tonight and why should they?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:14 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:26 am
Posts: 10
KoRn wrote:
Garlett has been missing for a couple of weeks now, a big concern.

And can we stop kicking long bombs to Warnock? Seems like he is the go-to man whenever we have no one to kick it to. There's really no point, he can't mark the ball.

Not going to kick the goal even if he jags the mark


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:20 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Blueboy_Dan wrote:
Read the first page and shook my head, are you people for real? It was so god damn obvious we weren't trying after half time with next week on our minds...just look at the body language of Irish and the team when he kicked his 4th to bring it back to 12 with plenty of time..nobody even came to pump him up and he didn't even celebrate at all.the players did not go all out tonight and why should they?

Very interesting point. I thought his celebration was pretty subdued after the first one as well. He usually goes berserk, pulls the jumper and kisses the logo etc etc. Last night, just a fistpump to himself.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:40 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
I'm a big believer that when two sides are relatively evenly matched you back the one with most skin in the game. Given we beat them by three points earlier in the year, I'd say the two sides are close enough - therefore I'm not surprised St Kilda won.

Great to see Hendo dominate the shaved one, and Lucas showed the form of 2010.

On the fluipside, there are two blokes in the team who show no appetite whatsoever for the big games. I'm not sure what we do with them. Unless next week turns into a romp for us then these two blokes will do absolutely nothing again. Give us a five goal lead though and they will shine.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 173 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group