Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 8:14 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:05 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Agree with that Johnny but we really need to get the monkey off the back with these guys - the last 7 times is terrible -its worse than Essendon*
Who didnt go to the game expecting the krakouer brothers to be roughed up by guerra et al
we knew judd was going to be hammered -we knew given our first 3 choices to play on Franklin - bower waite and walker were not there that if he got off the leash we were going to struggle

We always struggle against their cluster whilst other teams have mastered it and score heavily against them - they are slow apart from hooper and rioli and we should have been able to exploit it

Sick of being intimidated by them - look at panic when we got within 4 goals in the third quarter imagine if eddie and setaint had done the right thing near the end of the third quarter

Im waiting for the return bout against these arrogant pricks - hopefully not this year which means they wont make the finals - next time we really need to put them to the sword


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:10 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 7:47 pm
Posts: 193
after winning under those conditions last week against port, its hard to say our team is mentally weak. We showed a lot of mental strength and character to win last week. It was just a bad day at the office today.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16962
Location: Melbourne
Michael Jezz wrote:
If ever a game indicated that our recruiting policy needs to target some more key position players it was this one. To paraphrase a great point by Tim Watson. Öur game is too reliant on run off half back by Walker, Bower & Lucas. They create quick transition for Garlett, Betts and Yarran. When they get injured our scoring options dry up. We don't have the big key forwards to provide that alternative, so when the ball moves slowly garlett, yarran and to an extent betts are limited. We also are a big backman short to play on Roughead, Franklin, Brown,Dawes & Cloke. They beat us every time


Media commentators are just like knee jerk reactionary supporters. They change their attitude week to week. If we still had Fev we would be 1 dimensional when we didn't win. Now we have more options it is the HBF's fault if we don't win. :screwy: :screwy: :screwy:

If we had run and worked harder with Fev we would have won more games than we lose. Likewise with the current setup. No run, no win for most teams, including us.

We are not a Bigman short necessarily, we are are a few big men injured in Bower and Austin. A guy like Buddy is a freak and he will cut you up if he is on. Roughy is a tough to control, just like Josh Kennedy is now and Hendo will be.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:18 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:20 pm
Posts: 110
I honestly think that we need to add some hard tough players to the team. We just aren't physically strong enough or tough enough at this stage. Physically we can get stronger with another preseason or two but most of our players are not what I would call hard and tough and IMHO tough players are worth their weight in gold and we need a couple in the team.

Wouldn't have made any difference today but I thought Judd did quite well to get up and keep going after he got poleaxed. you could hear the collision from the other side of the ground.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Blue Revival wrote:
can someone please tell me what constitutes holding the ball these days, because i have no flowering idea!!


Who let the umpires in?

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2416
Location: Melbourne
Andain wrote:
Captain Dan wrote:
Am honestly not surprised. Tipped the Hawks to get over us today. With the games we had coming up, we had to drop a game somewhere.

Look forward to the next three weeks. After losing today we're better placed to win our next three.

That makes no logical sense at all.

The way I see it is, if we had won the game today, we would have gone into next week against the Eagles aiming for a fourth straight win, then against Melbourne aiming for a 5th straight win, then against North, for a 6th straight win, and...further down the fixture, against Freo aiming for a 7th. It would make the pressure greater than it needs to be, for games that we're favoured to win already (with the exception of the Fremantle game perhaps).

We know with a young group it is hard to stay up for long periods of time. Hell, we've seen with even the competition's best that it is hard to stay up week after week. Just take a look at Geelong. Would rather us drop a game off the back of two very good wins rather than become over-confident heading into a period of games that we're "expected to win". Further, I would back us in to beat the Eagles next week when we need to bounce back, rather than with a team full of over-inflated egos, pumped up from the media. We were bound to drop a game somewhere along the line of 'fancied' games...please be realistic. We'd all rather win than lose, but at the end of the day, taking the positives out of a loss like today is much better than sobbing and slitting wrists.

If someone had said prior to the season that we'd be 5-4 after round 9, and a red-hot chance of being 6-4 after round 10 and 7-4 after round 11, then they probably would have been carted off to the looney-bin. As others have said, our draw in the opening rounds of the year has been tough, but we have fought through it. Considering the opposition we've faced and beaten, I think the supporters should count their lucky stars that things haven't panned out the way the media were predicting- some said 1-8, and so on. If there is this much sulking going on after we're 5-4 and a real show to be 6-4 next week, then I would really, really hate to see the reactions of so-called supporters if we did go 1-8.

People just need to relax.

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:31 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 12544
Location: Brisbane
camelboy wrote:
Blue Revival wrote:
can someone please tell me what constitutes holding the ball these days, because i have no flowering idea!!


Who let the umpires in?



:lol:

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Cazzesman wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
If ever a game indicated that our recruiting policy needs to target some more key position players it was this one. To paraphrase a great point by Tim Watson. Öur game is too reliant on run off half back by Walker, Bower & Lucas. They create quick transition for Garlett, Betts and Yarran. When they get injured our scoring options dry up. We don't have the big key forwards to provide that alternative, so when the ball moves slowly garlett, yarran and to an extent betts are limited. We also are a big backman short to play on Roughead, Franklin, Brown,Dawes & Cloke. They beat us every time


Media commentators are just like knee jerk reactionary supporters. They change their attitude week to week...


Yep, last week the same Ch7 commentators were saying we were top 4 material. IIRC Sheahan said we were the third best team in the comp. :hitcomputer:

As much as I love Carlton, even I know they are not the messiah. Yet.

The first question to ask - are we better and a more advanced football team than at this stage last year? (My answer: Yes)

Second question - are we capable of consistently competing at our highest level week in week out? (My answer: Not just yet)

But, with each game we play the team is getting better. Even a poor effort like today will help the team identify the areas we need to work on.

As a group our players aren't ahead of expectations and they're not really below expectations.

Today sucked, but so far this year, we have generally bounced back well from a loss. We've strung a couple wins together twice this in 2010, now lets work on three. :thumbsup:

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 5:58 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3189
Location: Whistler
frank dardew wrote:
Agree with that Johnny but we really need to get the monkey off the back with these guys - the last 7 times is terrible -its worse than Essendon*
Who didnt go to the game expecting the krakouer brothers to be roughed up by guerra et al
we knew judd was going to be hammered -we knew given our first 3 choices to play on Franklin - bower waite and walker were not there that if he got off the leash we were going to struggle

We always struggle against their cluster whilst other teams have mastered it and score heavily against them - they are slow apart from hooper and rioli and we should have been able to exploit it

Sick of being intimidated by them - look at panic when we got within 4 goals in the third quarter imagine if eddie and setaint had done the right thing near the end of the third quarter

Im waiting for the return bout against these arrogant pricks - hopefully not this year which means they wont make the finals - next time we really need to put them to the sword


Am I the only Blues fan who hates Luke Hodge for being a sneaky sniping turd who the umpires seem to love?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:56 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:05 am
Posts: 599
Location: Dandenong
We never beat these p**&%s it annoys me so bad. They physically bash us everytime.
All ill say is how they were paying $3 for the win is beyond me. Needless to say i was on and collected.

_________________
Matty Kruzer you star!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 9:32 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13435
Location: Melbourne
Hello all, long time reader first time poster etc.

I went yesterday and yes, it was bloody disappointing to see us put up such a poor showing. Especially given that both our rotten games this year have been big home games with a big crowd in attendance! :cry: I also had a bad feeling about the game like many of you did as well and could tell it was going to be a stinker in some way.

A few comments:

- I do think there is some mental block there which should be addressed but will probably rectify itself with time and experience. We do struggle when playing as favourites (see Hawthorn and Essendon* games this year), when playing a team with have a poor record with (Hawthorn, Essendon*, in the past St Kilda, Sydney, Adelaide) and we seem to freak out when we get a few goals down and panic. We are murderous front runners but generally poor chasers.

- I agree with the poster who said we could do with some big tough blokes in the team especially given the injuries to nearly out entire defence. It was a very physical game and the Hawks were doing very well at constantly niggling and intimidating our players (yes I think they have some real sniping sneaky b*stards on their side) - I think Setanta spent most of his time in a shoving match and we often looked hesitant. Somethingfor the recruiting team to think about in the future perhaps.

- Setanta needs to be told that if he marks within 20-30m of goal he's having a shot, end of story.

- Overall consistency will be our main issue this season, we're just not quite ready yet. I think we will be awesome come 2011 but this year will be a bit up and down.


Last edited by missnaut on Mon May 24, 2010 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 9:32 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Against the Saint and Cats we were the hunters, yesterday we were the hunted and just like Essendon* the last few times we can't handle it yet.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 9:50 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
99prelim wrote:
blue4 wrote:
Andain wrote:
You can't blame injuries for losses because list depth is all apart of being a top team. It's clear that we don't have it, we just don't have the depth to cover 1/3 of our best 22 injuried.


finally.


"finally what?????"
Which other team could also cover 1/3 of their best 22 injured. Depth was not the probleme today. We saw it in the 3rd quarter with two players benched. Why couldn't we play that sort of footy from the start. Their "heads" were the problem today, not depth


Spot on. It's drawing a very long bow to say any of those players inclusion would have made a difference, the team as a whole were not mentally switched on from the captain down and Hawthorn's zoning and tackling exposed that. Perhaps against a lesser side we may have got away with it but Hawthorn came to play and we didn't.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 9:56 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
It's worth noting that it's pretty clear we have followed Geelong's handball happy game plan this year and the Hawks are the one side who have done okay against the cats during their dominance.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 10:04 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2416
Location: Melbourne
TheGame wrote:
It's worth noting that it's pretty clear we have followed Geelong's handball happy game plan this year and the Hawks are the one side who have done okay against the cats during their dominance.

If you're referring to times like 2007-08, then I agree. But as for this year, I do not agree that they've been the only team the give the Cats grief.

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 10:10 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13435
Location: Melbourne
TheGame wrote:
It's worth noting that it's pretty clear we have followed Geelong's handball happy game plan this year and the Hawks are the one side who have done okay against the cats during their dominance.


The handballs were killing me yesterday. Every time BAM tackle/free kick/turnover.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 10:27 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
Had our chance to give them an almighty shock late in the 3rd term but pathetic kicking for goal and dumb decision making cost us any opportunity of making a game of it... Even Judd is some shocking things today...

Just on the Juddster, has anybody else noticed how bad his kicking for goal is, or how reluctant he actually is to kick for goal on the occasions he's on the run 50 metres out. This is the one area where Ablett Jnr has it all over the Great Man....

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 10:41 am 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:25 pm
Posts: 247
Lets just face facts! This is a team that really has the wood on us, they match up really well against us and we have no idea how to beat them at their game irrespective of where they are or we are on the ladder. Its just like the mob from Laxette centre has it all over the swannabies.

_________________
Blueboy forever


Last edited by ubettsya on Tue May 25, 2010 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 10:45 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Dominator_7 wrote:
or how reluctant he actually is to kick for goal on the occasions he's on the run 50 metres out. This is the one area where Ablett Jnr has it all over the Great Man....


Agreed, sometimes doing the team thing is to kick the f%^*& goal.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 11:29 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
Andain wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Andain wrote:
You can't blame injuries for losses because list depth is all apart of being a top team. It's clear that we don't have it, we just don't have the depth to cover 1/3 of our best 22 injuried.


I'm not sure list depth helps on match day when you have two in the 'dugout' well before half time and Yazz with a hip injury just before three quarter time. I strongly doubt it had anything to do with the loss but I suspect it would have had something to do with the size of the losing margin.

Teams like the Blues are still a 10-6 (ladder position) team list wise so injuries to our better players are always going to take its toll over a season.

Regards Cazzesman

The game was over well before half time. I'm not saying the replacements didn't try or didn't have their positive moments but the team dymnatic was badly effected today. Something was seriously wrong with the attitude of the team and with more kids in the team than usual we didn't have the leaders on the field to arrest that apathy and turn it around. It's disappointing because at our best we can beat anyone. To beat Geelong and St Kilda, yet lose to Essendon* and Hawthorn... :cry:

Oh well, looks like you're right. We are a 6-10 team list, and that's a bitter pill to take after beating the Saints and Geelong.


I thought throughout the game we seemed fatigued; playing with heavy boots. Just seemed that way.
We had a lot of peripheral/ developing players in, a loss of 6 of our best 22 from the list, and our 3rd game in 3 weeks, after a stirling come from behind win away with 2 injured on the bench, and that's at the beginning of the game. Moving on, we had lost 2 players before half time and 3 missing by 3/4 time.

We picked a young, inexperienced, developing and light bodied team to go head to head with a team who looked bigger, play dirtier with nothing to lose and the whole world focussed on how they responded this weekend. The team we picked were always up against it, and I was proud to see them fight their way back at the end of the 3rd.

A tired young team fighting in the wrong weight division is what it looked like to me.

We will be much better when we have Waite, Walker, Bower, Austin, Houlihan, Hadley, McLean, all available for selection; even Grigg against the Dawks would have been good to have available for his toughness.

We'll get 'em when we have our best on the field to combat them; hopefully we do a Brizzy 09 on them during the finals in 2010.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google Adsense [Bot], MPH78 and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group