AGRO wrote:
Blues2005 wrote:
Hindsight is a wonderful thing isn't it?!
But foresight is a whole lot better.
Those who dont study history are condemned to repeat it.
1939, 1940 and 1941 were really a shitty time for the "The Allies" - a glorious retreat at Dunkirk - a bit of pride swallowing, a lot of forward planning then a push in 1944 to win the war (kind of mirrors our 1938 to 1945 flag gap).
Speaking of history... can you remind me again how many times West Coast has needed to tank and gain a PP to win a premiership and finish in the finals every year for the last 16 (except for 2)?
oh and here's a thought, if our list is that bad and the ONLY way for us to EVER regain long term success is to obtain ONE more high draft pick, why not just trade Fev for it? Surely Fev won't be around for our next premiership team anyway. There's more than one way to skin a cat. It's called list managment.
For the record, I'm hoping for a win this weekend, as long as we are playing the kids. Wins in 2004 were meaningless for our future because we were playing a futureless team full of recycled hacks. Our 2007 team is full of young guns where every win goes towards building a successful team. But if we do lose, and the silver lining is the PP, I'll be happy to take. It is what it is.
Like I said, as long as they continue to play the right players I'll be happy. So if Saddo gets dropped for Austin and Bannister for Edwards, even better. At this stage of the year, with finals out of the equation, we need to be testing each player to see where he's at. Look at the positive results we achieved from putting Jackson through his pacers and Eddie in the middle. But if it results in a win by doing so, lets also take it and be happy about it.