Blue Vain wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Pagan may well be a fading (or faded) star in the coaching caper, but Mitchell is not what I would label a well-rounded coach. The more I think about his only evident game plan and those who underpin it, the more I worry about Mitchell's ability to be a long-term coach if he were to start in the coming season.
This is my main concern with the idea of moving Pagan on, the lack of genuine contenders to be his replacement, unless of course you all enjoy the idea of knocking down and rebuilding the football department every four years.
What evident game plan?
Care to elaborate on it?
That would be the only one he has, which is not dissimilar to the one Pagan uses.
Failing that, he turns to the same option you bemoan Pagan for: mass flooding.
Maybe he's more willing to make positional changes, rotate through the bench and flick the switch on the flood, but I've already discussed the idea of Pagan protecting and developing players through the bench.
Mitchell has also seemingly used the bench as a developmental tool this season with Bryan, Setanta and Hartlett being noted for having days with continual dragging and being put on the phone. 1 on 1 development is Mitchell's strength (one would assume it would also be the basis for his good rapport with our younger players) and why I want him to still be around, not because he supposedly has match day tactical ability.
I mean where is Mitchell on match day when this stuff happens? He's in the box isn't he? Or do they gag him and throw him in the corner, or completely ignore him? We would have heard murmurs years ago.
Get rid of Trout and Libba, I don't mind - I'm not fans of either of them - but we should be looking to see if Pagan and Mitchell complement each other's abilities if we're even considering Mitchell, because he's not ready to stand on his own two feet in my mind.