Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 5:10 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 138 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

How much is Nick Stevens worth?
$450K+ 7%  7%  [ 8 ]
$400K-$449K 9%  9%  [ 10 ]
$350K-$399K 20%  20%  [ 23 ]
$300K-$349K 18%  18%  [ 21 ]
$250K-$299K 12%  12%  [ 14 ]
$200K-$249K 3%  3%  [ 4 ]
Trade at end of 2006 31%  31%  [ 36 ]
Total votes : 116
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 1:56 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Keep.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 1:59 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
I've been vocal anti-Goddard for a long time, but he's started to show something in the last few weeks I reckon.

I'd love him to turn it around in the navy blue, and at least with his upbringing we know he'll never die wondering.

Maybe it's time we rattled that tree.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
jim wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
jim wrote:
blueblood95 wrote:
I reckon Sheldon is right.

A second round pick would be of greater value for the future of the club.

We have had to start at the bottom so let's not take anymoreshort cuts.

Stevens is a player that as stated earlier in this thread is a "clone" of Campo. We dont need pretty recievers, we need players who are willing to get the ball and run in numbers to support each other= ala Murphy, Bentick and Walker.

If you look at the current Crows team they have 22 hard workers every week. They dont play the "Campo/Stevens" type players.
That's funny. A second round pick. How hit and miss is the draft, especially by the second round, and you want to exchange a class player for him


It's not that simple.

The 2nd round of the draft is as speculative as trying to guess when our side will be 'good enough' again to afford Stevens the luxury many think he needs - that of not getting the best tagger every weekâ„¢.

Good player in a good side - fair enough, I don't necessarily disagree with that. We're not a good side though, and can we afford to have him waiting around in the wings while we rely on others to make us that good side?

We need players that can make changes happen and benefit from the changes when they do happen.

Not players that rely exclusively on the level of players around them.
We can.....he's been 2nd in our B & F in both his years here making him better than most players in our club at the moment. With our youngsters still developing we can't afford to be getting rid of players of that ilk as young players need good seniors footballers around them to develop (they need a good coach too but that's another story). Over the last couple of years people wanted to get rid of Fev, Lance, now Stevens. In regards to the former 2, gee aren't we glad we didn't lose them (that's football supporters for you and why they're on internet forum boards and no-where else). It'll be the same for Stevens to. A team full of kids without leaders would be a disaster and set us back further. We get thrashed enough as it is. Not to mention the little thing of him being under contract, one worth $500,000 per year. I think we've paid our players enough to play at other clubs over the last few years. The problems is many think with their emotions and not their brains.


So jim....while you're thinking with your emotions and not your brain and telling us (repeatedly) the coach is no good....can you explain why you're on an internet forum board and no-where else?

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:22 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
Deano Supremo wrote:
I've been vocal anti-Goddard for a long time, but he's started to show something in the last few weeks I reckon.

I'd love him to turn it around in the navy blue, and at least with his upbringing we know he'll never die wondering.

Maybe it's time we rattled that tree.


Man him up at he will get caught out every time.
I've yet to see him win a contest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:30 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Goddard is a good footballer....but I still wouldnt be trading Stevens for him and not for a second rnder either...
You would only trade a player of Stevens quality for a deal where you were a huge winner IMO.....Stevens market value is down at the moment so its a bad time to try and trade ...you trade when your player has high value and buy when your target player has low value...

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20251
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Only I'm allowed to have double standards around here. :lol:

This actually didn't start out as a "Trade Stevens" campaign, certainly not from my perspective. Yes it was born out of frustration molsey, you're right, but frustration with a player who as good as he possibly could be, will not get the chance to ever realise that at Carlton.

Stevens supporters consistently say that he needs the support around him. I agree totally. But where is it going to come from, and what's more, by the time it does, will Stevens be the player he could be, or will his value at the trade table bring us anything?

That's as speculative as a 2nd round draft choice.

Agree, we need leaders. But if Stevens hasn't stepped up as a leader in Kouta's absence, and when he's been seemingly overtaken by Lance in the quest for the 2007 captaincy you'd have to ask his worth there.

His biggest attraction when we got hold of him were his skills. I'd like someone to tell me they are still at the same level they have been prior to now?

2nd in our Best & Fairest doesn't mean much Jim. David Teague won one. Corey McKernan won one. Of late their value has been diminished substantially. It's not the 8) measurement of a player's worth any more than leading a few stats categories is.

Heath Scotland leads more stats categories than Fev. Is he a better player, or of more value to the team?

I'll admit that there is plenty of emotion involved in this, it's an emotional game. But to say there's no brains involved or ill conceived thinking really just means that your opinion differs to mine.

But I'll fall into line. Let's not even consider thinking outside the square and putting up someone who still has some worth to a different type of side to ours.

And I wasn't in favour of trading Fev. I did agree with considering the Lance trade if, as with any player, we could get something worthwhile for him. We couldn't, Lance got the rocket he needed, and he's rightfully our captain at the moment.

If Stevens can turn things around, renegotiate a more reasonable contract, and really lead this club, then great! We've got a winner!

But I'm not confident enough to say that this will happen if we hold on to him regardless and don't consider trades if they eventuate.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:53 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Spot on, BH. Couldn't have put it better myself.

Well, I could, but I just couldn't be bothered putting in all that effort to type all them wordy things.....

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:16 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
jim wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
How about a possible scenario of stevens for goddard? :wink:

It could proceed via the following...
1. Goddard is out of contract - we offer over the top on a heavily front loaded for goddard and he say he wants to be traded (average 350-400k @ say 500k, 400k, 300k).
2. We refuse to trade early picks and thus offer stevens and offer to pay part salary (say 100-150k).
3. Saint accept the deal as it saves them cap room next year (to re-sign other players). We end up paying effectively 600-650k next yr for effectively goddard (able to do so through kouta's saved salary)


Would such a scenario be more enticing than say a straight swap for pick. 10-13 via collingwood/saints?
got no great interest in Goddard. Plays loose, no opponent, soft , gets easy kicks, although they're good ones. Need another player like that like a hole in the head. We did better in the end getting Simmo that year, who we probably wouldn't have picked up under normal circumstances as we may have gone down a differenmt path. I'd bet, the way we set up, Goddard would miss targets badly too like everyone else in the team. Then being the true football supporters as we are Goddard would get bagged unmercifully as well. He was alot more ineffective on Saturday when Essendon* manned him up.


For a moment there is sounded to me as if you were describing stevens :lol: I think goddard is a better kick than stevens though and is about 5 years younger. If we use the same arguement that they can only be gun players in a good side, then at the very least goddard would be at his peak when we get there (unlike stevens who might be on the downslope at that stage due to age). I think most pundits would agree - we havent seen the best of goddard yet - its almost certain that we have seen the best of nick stevens...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:22 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20251
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Nick Stevens for Daniel Wells. I'm sure we could turn Wells into a back pocket player.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:04 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 5:31 pm
Posts: 351
Rhys26 wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
I've been vocal anti-Goddard for a long time, but he's started to show something in the last few weeks I reckon.

I'd love him to turn it around in the navy blue, and at least with his upbringing we know he'll never die wondering.

Maybe it's time we rattled that tree.


Man him up at he will get caught out every time.
I've yet to see him win a contest


Okay I will bite.

Contested possessions

Stevens 1.6
Goddard 2.1

Disposals

Stevens 24
Goddard 21

Tackles

Stevens 4.2
Goddard 4

Long kicks

Stevens 5.3
Goddard 7.1

Errors

Stevens 3.8
Goddard 2.4

1%ers

Stevens 3.8
Goddard 3.7

and the 1 stat where the keep Stevens scenario is important for us

Clearances

Stevens 3.6
Goddard 1.0

Goddard down back mainly. Never played any significant time in the midfield. Less pressure on him but he can play. So little errors for someone who kicks the ball long so often. His diposal is in the top 5 in the competition given time.

I would do a straight swap.

But thats just my opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:11 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
mojo31 wrote:
Rhys26 wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
I've been vocal anti-Goddard for a long time, but he's started to show something in the last few weeks I reckon.

I'd love him to turn it around in the navy blue, and at least with his upbringing we know he'll never die wondering.

Maybe it's time we rattled that tree.


Man him up at he will get caught out every time.
I've yet to see him win a contest


Okay I will bite.

Contested possessions

Stevens 1.6
Goddard 2.1

Disposals

Stevens 24
Goddard 21

Tackles

Stevens 4.2
Goddard 4

Long kicks

Stevens 5.3
Goddard 7.1

Errors

Stevens 3.8
Goddard 2.4

1%ers

Stevens 3.8
Goddard 3.7

and the 1 stat where the keep Stevens scenario is important for us

Clearances

Stevens 3.6
Goddard 1.0

Goddard down back mainly. Never played any significant time in the midfield. Less pressure on him but he can play. So little errors for someone who kicks the ball long so often. His diposal is in the top 5 in the competition given time.

I would do a straight swap.

But thats just my opinion.


Totally agree mojo, I would love that as a straight swap.

The club would really have to sell the fact that Nick has 5 or 6 good years left (fits into St Kilda's window of opportunity) and emphasise the details such as the clearance numbers etc.

With Harvey about to retire the timing might be good.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:13 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 2:16 pm
Posts: 370
Location: Adelaide
Goddard would be a great swap.

_________________
Revenge is a dish best served cold

&

I AM PROUD SPONSOR OF THE CAROLINE WILSON HATE CLUB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:03 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
St K wouldn't be able to fit him into their salary cap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 5:36 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
BlueWorld wrote:
St K wouldn't be able to fit him into their salary cap.


Hence we offer to pay part or even significant salary for 2007. I'd imagine that they could afford stevens in 2008 as I could see one or two of harvey/thompson/peckett retiring by 2008 season


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:10 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Pagan said today he definitely won't be traded & is one of our most important players.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
Must be kept.

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:53 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20251
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
BlueWorld wrote:
Pagan said today he definitely won't be traded & is one of our most important players.


Pagan, with all due respect to the man, may not be making that decision :lol:

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:21 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
bluehammer wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Pagan said today he definitely won't be traded & is one of our most important players.


Pagan, with all due respect to the man, may not be making that decision :lol:


He did say that would be the case for as long as he's coaching Carlton!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:22 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
bluehammer wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Pagan said today he definitely won't be traded & is one of our most important players.


Pagan, with all due respect to the man, may not be making that decision :lol:


But he gets the best tagger every weekâ„¢, BH.

:wink:

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:24 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
phoenix johnson wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Pagan said today he definitely won't be traded & is one of our most important players.


Pagan, with all due respect to the man, may not be making that decision :lol:


But he gets the best tagger every week, BH.

:wink:


jokes aside, this is what i think is 1 of the major factor that separates champions from the rest, judd gets the best tagger every week sometimes even 2 but no one ever complains about that. no one expects stevens to be a champion but its just part of football i guess you gotta put up with taggers.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 138 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group