Cazzesman wrote:
Braithy wrote:
...this list needs thinning out at the top and spreading some wealth across the park, imo.
this board baffles me. doing the same things for the same results, year in and year out is killing me. people want to keep the bulk of the list, not change the overpaid core and keep voss and then complain on match days that we're still shit.
something, somewhere inside this club has to give, has to change, has to be rolled over, or we are standing pat in mediocrity...
Can't the thinning be done with TDK, McGovern, Williams, Doc, Acres and Fantasia? Plenty of Fat there to cull. Maybe even Saad (30yrs) at a pinch and for the right offer.
Are you trading Harry for picks or another player/s. If it is a Player, then who would it be? If it is picks, then those kids are years away with no gaurantees.
Without knowing the offers, it's hard to know but I'd always keep my options open. If we fail to make the 8, anything should be on the table.
If Sydney offered their first for Harry, would we offer WC 2 top 10 picks for Harley Reid? (Sydney No.1 and TDK compo?) I would. Dynamic movement in the middle is exactly what we need at the moment. I wouldn't be chasing draft picks at the moment unless we knew we could turn them into established players.
We have enough quality young talent on the list or coming through in the next 18 months.
I'm happy too keep Harry but I don't rate him as highly as others. His leading patterns are designed to address his deficiencies. Run out wide to the pocket to get the "around the corner" shot at goal. IMHO, it dilutes our already average ground ball presentation. Charlie cops some shit here but I've seen him play some "team focussed" games that are huge. IIRC, there was a game last year (Hawks?) where we had no other tall players available in the front half at all. We were decimated by injury.
Charlies job was to compete at every contest, create a ground ball and not get outmarked. He had a huge game. Busted his guts for 100 minutes.
They're the reasons Charlie is voted into the leadership group IMO. He's not always smart but he will put his team mate before himself 100% of the time. Sometimes to our detriment. That's why they love him. I don't see that with Harry. He's a team man but he's a Harry man first.
But hey, if the offers aren't great, hopefully we can make it happen other ways.
