litho_43 wrote:
I just think we've lost a good person in Bolts. And any business can't afford to lose good people.
Apparently we thought he was the right fit, backed him in unequivocally but then sack him a week later due to our win/ loss?
What have our assistants brought to the table? Some of the kick-on choices out of defence have been disgraceful - Bolts or defensive coach?
It seems an emotional decision and one that doesn't result in an answer. If there's no answer, then why make the decision.
There was more to gain sticking with Bolts for another month - at least understanding what the issues are before making this decision.
What additional assistance have we given BB, an inexperienced coach, so he can imorove? Ask someone mentioned before, did he choose hisnowk assistants?
When the going got tough this year after close losses, did the club help Bolts improve and freshen up from the pressure - did they set him up with the right people, advisors, mentors, to help him with what the breakdown is with our ball movement, decisions in close games, and then assist in advising our own board of what to do next?
He did a lot of good. We turn the close losses to wins this year and he'd be safe. But instead he's gone.
On the surface, it's an understandable decision, but I doubt in the process and vision behind it - I don't see Teague appointment helping at this stage, and losing Bolts for good doesn't help either.
Yeah I don't think we exhausted all options in supporting Bolton.
I think Liddle's requirement to continue growing the membership had a lot to do with the decision at this time. I imagine a lot of members would have been cancelling their auto-renewals so I understand it from a commercial point of view.
But losing good people is still hard to accept IMO.