Kaptain Kouta wrote:
And what's more, the ideas which have been presented so far are just a small percentage of what's available.
As far as player interviews go, why not tape and podcast a Carlton Internet Radio program with Carlton news, interviews, etc, as well as music, where the "station" could have players be "guest DJ" for an hour or 2 and choose the playlist and explain why they like the song and what it means to them, like the guests on Rage.
Absolutely - this comes back to what I was saying about the strength of communities. If you have a community based on a hierachy the pool of ideas is minute by its very nature. When you share ownership of a resource you open that pool to so many resources it's not funny.
I'm one idiot sitting on the end of a computer. KK you're another. Jarusa's another. No matter how smart any one of us are there's no way that any one of us could ever come up with 1% of the potential functions for a true online CFC hub let alone provide the resources to implement them. The strength is in the diversity of the ideas.
The Blueseum is great but last time I looked only four people had contributed. To some this might be an argument for the idea of a CFC being doomed to failure. I don't believe this is the case. The incentive to contribute to a central CFC site of the ilk we're discussing is way stronger than any one fan site which may or may not survive. I don't doubt Jarusa will follow through on the Blueseum but the authority and continuity inherent in the "official" site means people are much more confident that there work will be lasting and not trashed 6 weeks down the track when there's not enough interest shown.
Mordan wrote:
I'm really fearful that the club won't be able to wean itself from the Telstra money. If the club is making big money from Telstra, they're probably going to laugh at anyone who comes along and suggests going it alone once the contract is up. They'd be looking at going from significant income, to a significant expensive (with little to no direct income).
As Jarusa mentioned earlier I doubt Telstra will be offering anything like what they did last time. It's just as possible they and others will be charging for their hosting and content services.
If they want to front up with 3-4 million a year then I'd say take it but a properly run site should be generating that yearly via the various intangibles it would promote. Essendon* understand this and use the various media channels to grow their supporter base better than most. You don't have to extract income directly from a source in order to gain revenue. Every time Sheeds sticks his head on the box the exposure and the membership dollars are strengthened.