Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 01, 2025 10:47 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 11:34 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24914
Location: Bondi Beach
Crusader wrote:
CK95 wrote:
We got a stupid one given our way in the first half for deliberate I thought.

But across the game they got heaps more of the 50-50. The HTB against White in our backline in the last qtr was a shocker I thought. There wasn't much White could do about that at all

Could argue that he never took possession & it was Philipou that dragged it in.

The umpiring was awful.


White handballed it out before he hit the ground. The handball was smothered and it hit the floor and Philippou dragged it under.

Was not holding the ball.

Maybe it happened too quick for the umpire to officiate with accuracy, or, he cheated.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 11:43 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7114
missnaut wrote:
Some comments from my 5&7yo kids during the first half.

Carlton need to kick some goals.

Carlton need to kick some more goals.

Did he get six points, oh no he did bad and only got one.

Ooh Charlie has big muscles!



haha. i was chuckling at this in the game thread. these kids are my spirit animals :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 11:49 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10534
sinbagger wrote:
I think we need Young in the fwd line to take pressure off Curnow so we have two talls (Young and Harry) to compete in the air. Curnow isn't really an effective key position player, he is outmarked way too much. was worried when we moved Young to the backline that would enable the saints to lock down our forwards.


:thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 11:52 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10534
Sydney Blue wrote:
I can be pretty negative about Carlton at times but I was actually quite pleased to watch them slug it out last night.
We haven't handled pressure when other teams ramp it up. We did last night .

Let's hope that they can back it up next week against Swans and not put in another pathetic performance like they did against Crows.


Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk


:thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 11:55 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6343
GreatEx wrote:
windy wrote:
Thanks for that Keogh.


:) I was looking at the Haynes thread yesterday and keogh still hasn't said anything except he's crap


Yeah he has been good after a slow start
But the thing is why did we get him
Because are window is open
Face it it’s shut
What we needed defensively is another key back and another running half back creative with ball in hand
Where I really got it wrong was underrating JOS
Been terrific

Captain obvious would say we need a running half back but know we go for a 32 interceptor who is an average kick. I know we didn’t get Houston but still
Haynes is not creative with ball in hand
Reckon Saad is a shadow of the player he was too


Haynes Doesn’t take the game on
And often plays loose in defence on smaller forwards
Does it a bit easy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 12:08 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14511
Location: Sydney
Well, it started promisingly... :D

I'm with you on JSOS. Thought he'd be too slow and not a good enough kick. He's been a revelation. Not sure where the improved kicking came from, but he proves the old cliché that the game is 90% (give or take) above the shoulders. Maybe more like 60% these days, but enough that you notice.

That rule may eventually apply to Binns, too. The physical flaws (including kicking length) are plain to see, but he had the impact that the likes of LOB never did. Maybe he'll make it. I'd still like to have my cake and eat it too. What's baking in Jagga's kitchen?

Have to disagree on Haynes's kicking. Been a very accurate distributor down the flanks. I'd like to see him take some of the riskier outlet passes, he changes angles nicely but still mostly outside the centre square where there's margin for error.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 12:33 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4932
bondiblue wrote:
Crusader wrote:
CK95 wrote:
We got a stupid one given our way in the first half for deliberate I thought.

But across the game they got heaps more of the 50-50. The HTB against White in our backline in the last qtr was a shocker I thought. There wasn't much White could do about that at all

Could argue that he never took possession & it was Philipou that dragged it in.

The umpiring was awful.


White handballed it out before he hit the ground. The handball was smothered and it hit the floor and Philippou dragged it under.

Was not holding the ball.

Maybe it happened too quick for the umpire to officiate with accuracy, or, he cheated.

The high free kick given to Higgins in front of goal in the 2nd qtr was even worse.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 12:43 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6343
Binns is clearly slow one paced
Not a high % of fast twitching muscle fibres
Looks like he is jogging on the spot and can’t kick over a jam tin
But he plays wide and gets the ball
And is an extrovert
Need a few more in our team


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 1:07 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13329
Location: Melbourne
Humpers wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Crusader wrote:
CK95 wrote:
We got a stupid one given our way in the first half for deliberate I thought.

But across the game they got heaps more of the 50-50. The HTB against White in our backline in the last qtr was a shocker I thought. There wasn't much White could do about that at all

Could argue that he never took possession & it was Philipou that dragged it in.

The umpiring was awful.


White handballed it out before he hit the ground. The handball was smothered and it hit the floor and Philippou dragged it under.

Was not holding the ball.

Maybe it happened too quick for the umpire to officiate with accuracy, or, he cheated.

The high free kick given to Higgins in front of goal in the 2nd qtr was even worse.
Wasn't upset to see him subbed off after that duck.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 1:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19331
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Humpers wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Crusader wrote:
CK95 wrote:
We got a stupid one given our way in the first half for deliberate I thought.

But across the game they got heaps more of the 50-50. The HTB against White in our backline in the last qtr was a shocker I thought. There wasn't much White could do about that at all

Could argue that he never took possession & it was Philipou that dragged it in.

The umpiring was awful.


White handballed it out before he hit the ground. The handball was smothered and it hit the floor and Philippou dragged it under.

Was not holding the ball.

Maybe it happened too quick for the umpire to officiate with accuracy, or, he cheated.

The high free kick given to Higgins in front of goal in the 2nd qtr was even worse.


The AFL rightly go on and on about concussion, but they continue (via their umpires) to reward players who bring high contact on themselves. Pathetic.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 1:13 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8152
Pros:

Contest and pressure.
SOJ, Haynes, Hewett, Harry.
Weiters and Cripps pretty good.
Good contributions from Young, Binns and Lord.
Charlie show in first half.
Didn't get cut up by Sinclair like we often do. Good performance from Elijah.

Cons:

More injuries.
Small forwards didn't contribute much. But at least they were laying tackles.
Walsh quiet again.


Last edited by Stefchook on Sat May 10, 2025 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 1:17 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 3489
Location: looking for a good bloke to have a beer with
Not sure how tackles are a “con”

We had an 87% tackle efficiency according to fox footy which is classed as elite

_________________
I'm shocked to be sitting here


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 1:46 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24914
Location: Bondi Beach
keogh wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
windy wrote:
Thanks for that Keogh.


:) I was looking at the Haynes thread yesterday and keogh still hasn't said anything except he's crap


Yeah he has been good after a slow start
But the thing is why did we get him
Because are window is open
Face it it’s shut
What we needed defensively is another key back and another running half back creative with ball in hand
Where I really got it wrong was underrating JOS
Been terrific

Captain obvious would say we need a running half back but know we go for a 32 interceptor who is an average kick. I know we didn’t get Houston but still
Haynes is not creative with ball in hand
Reckon Saad is a shadow of the player he was too


Haynes Doesn’t take the game on
And often plays loose in defence on smaller forwards
Does it a bit easy


You don't know anything about Haines and yet you still have a go at him every week....because of his age. WTF
You must laugh at Geelong and Collingwood.

Haines is a great kick. He's craetive and penetrating. He's a quick decision maker. That's why he's a cut above most.
He sees the game clearer than most. He watches it unfold. Its a knack, a skill and something most players wish they have. You should appreciate what he does have that others don't.

You've read the reasons why we convinced Haines to play for us but choose to forget the explananations to continue your shameless attack on his existence at Carlton.

Give the guy a break.

Youre the only one I know in Australia giving him a bake.

He doesnt intercept marks because he's playing against a smaller player. You're thinking of those 2 marks he took out marking Close v Cats one on one. He takes 10 a game.

His opponents dont kickl goals against him. round 1 when he had his shocking moments (2), his opponent only kicked 1 goal. His opponents haven't been able to get off his leash, but Haines gets away from them wiith ease to helphis team mates because he sees the game unfold. Its an art. He turns his artform into an elite interception.

Blind Freddy can see how important he is to us.

Fair suck of the Sav.

Our window is still open. Not closed because you said so.
Its a long season. Enjoy the wins.
See Swans 2004. We play the same ugly style of pressure and contest. It works. We only just got started.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 1:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24914
Location: Bondi Beach
Stefchook wrote:
Pros:

Contest and pressure.
SOJ, Haynes, Hewett, Harry.
Weiters and Cripps pretty good.
Good contributions from Young, Binns and Lord.
Charlie show in first half.
Didn't get cut up by Sinclair like we often do. Good performance from Elijah.

Cons:

More injuries.
Small forwards didn't contribute much. But at least they were laying tackles.
Walsh quiet again.


Walshy quiet, or quiet for him?
Had 21 disposals in a game only one player reached 30.

9 score involvements in a low scoring grind.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 1:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24914
Location: Bondi Beach
Effes wrote:

The AFL rightly go on and on about concussion, but they continue (via their umpires) to reward players who bring high contact on themselves. Pathetic.



:thumbsup:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 2:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2022 8:00 pm
Posts: 13
I can’t believe the lack of appreciation for Sam Walsh’s game. He had 9 score involvements and if you look at the highlights and see all of our goals, you will see how his running power and ability to create were one of the reasons we won the game. I put him in my votes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 2:20 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2712
To all those pessimists - WE WON!

GO BLUES!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 2:23 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9736
Location: Australia
jake_h03 wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
I think we need Young in the fwd line to take pressure off Curnow so we have two talls (Young and Harry) to compete in the air. Curnow isn't really an effective key position player, he is outmarked way too much. was worried when we moved Young to the backline that would enable the saints to lock down our forwards.


Im usually against being too top heavy in the forward line, but given our propensity to bomb it long, this actually has some credence. Plus, Young can’t really be any worse than whichever small forward he’s replacing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


My thoughts exactly, none of our small forwards dominate, their best contribution is as lockdown forward role. Young can play lock down forward just as well as any of them, plus he is a threat with his height and takes attention away from Charlie who struggles to be a tall, pack marking forward.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 2:24 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9736
Location: Australia
GreatEx wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
I think we need Young in the fwd line to take pressure off Curnow so we have two talls (Young and Harry) to compete in the air. Curnow isn't really an effective key position player, he is outmarked way too much. was worried when we moved Young to the backline that would enable the saints to lock down our forwards.


Im usually against being too top heavy in the forward line, but given our propensity to bomb it long, this actually has some credence. Plus, Young can’t really be any worse than whichever small forward he’s replacing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Maybe the answer is to call Charlie a small


He’s more like a HFF or forward pocket.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2025 3:07 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10387
Location: Coburg
Thought it was a gutsy win

McGov and Cowan injuries unbalanced the whole side yet we still ground out a win.

Thought Haynes was terrific (though the kick in the head slowed him a bit)

Think him, Weiters and SOS set us up beautifully down back.

Durdin needed to kick those 2 - if he had his game would have been excellent - small forwards need to take their chances.

Soon as Young went back Curnow's game dropped off.

Great goal from Harry at the end and Lord's goal was a ripper.

Hewitt is having some season and bot did we miss Cerra when he needed to go back.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 17th Premiership, klaatu and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group