diesel_85 wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Ollie or Acres to play on Smith?
Hewitt to Holmes.
Regards Cazzesman
George is one of the in form mids of the comp.
The opposition would be looking at George, not the other way around.
I don't think you go looking for a tag option for your best ball winning mid
George plays his best footy when he has a role. Which he has most weeks. He's not a "tagger"but he has a more defensive role than the rest of our mids. He was BOG on the weekend but his principle role was reducing the impact of LDU. Which he did perfectly and then played off him when we had possession.
He will go to Smith IMO. Smith is playing almost exclusively midfield and Ollie has no form there. George doesn't have the explosive run of Smith but he showed against Daicos that he has the smarts and strength to disrupt faster players access to the ball.
The call on Harry is interesting. I'd suggest he'll come back in but it will be interesting to see the impact on the forward line. Obviously he's a far superior talent compared to Young and offers significantly more impact when he's on song but I like the selfless behaviours we're seeing in the front half at the moment. Harry can be a star but the last thing I'd call Harry is selfless.
Young just does his role. He plays on the best interceptor (Lobb, Moore, Barrass) and he's rarely outmarked. His role is to reduce their effectiveness and to keep them away from Charlies leading lanes. None of those 3 had more than 3 marks for the game. Comben had a bit of the ball Friday but he wasn't a factor for them at all. The current structure gives us a reference point for our smalls instead of diluting it. They can lead up at the ball carrier or get back to Charlies feet and get to work. Especially when we have a 6 on 6 restart. I like the effectiveness and with the majority of crumbs being in the corridor, it is working well for our efficiency.
Dangerfield will be the interesting match up. He only attended maybe 1 centre bounce against the Hawks? Perhaps they're protecting him for a 6 day turn around against us but Smith, Atkins, Holmes and to a lesser extent Knevitt and Danger have been their preferred combination. What a great test for our boys.
I like the challenge. We'll know a lot more about the team in a weeks time.
Personally, I'd be tempted to bring Harry back as the sub. If the forward line functions well and we're winning, give him a run on the wing or similar. If the forward line isn't functioning, sub him in.
I suspect having Young as the "disruptor" in our front half will work well against the Cats.