Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 08, 2025 1:31 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:15 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 8942
Location: Melbourne
99prelim wrote:
Jonosc1 wrote:
We won.
No idea how.
We didn’t deserve it.

But hey it’s nice to win one where we played horrible for 3 quarters


I'll have to disagree...we butchered both tempo and decision making I50 in that 3rd qtr. Shouldve been at least 5 goals up at 3 quarter time


Agree. We won pretty much every stat in the book, except for Inside 50 efficiency. Basically we got stuck into the lazy habit of bombing it in and expecting Charlie and Harry to do the rest and then didn't have enough impact from the small forwards at ground level. Also when we did actually have guys open inside 50, we botched a lot of the chances with simple skill errors.

Hard to say we didn't deserve to win though.

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:16 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
I'm glass half full, Hawks hit the lead at ten minute mark of the last. Many would have expected us to fold and lose by 5 goals.

Instead we found a way.

Doc
Weiters
Jack

All did what they had to.

Fisher
LOB
Setters

Let us down far too often.

Charlie needs to compete at ground level. Williams needs to stop fearing contact. Although he and Newman had their moments.



Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:19 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:10 am
Posts: 1495
We’ve shown we can all lay good footy but need to control game better when we aren’t moving it quickly. It will come. Big changes to game plan take time. Impressive thing is we are winning and have lots of improvement to come.

My only comment is I think we are too tall up forward. It’s fine when we are getting it in quickly but McKay TDK Curnow Jack is too much. They were also spoiling each other a lot. Like to see another small up there to create more pressure and hold it in.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:23 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Always take the win Mick :thumbsup: but could have done much more
Had them at our mercy and let them
Off the hook
Good sides would have steamrollered over us easily
Tempo footy stuff stuck in our backline and stodgy ball movement gave it to the Hawks

Should have mentioned that Kennedy was pretty good again

Saad and McGovern and Oscar out from the week before so half the backline replaced to play today


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:28 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6321
Early days but we are 4 or 5 players off being a top 4 team
Ruck will be an issue against quality ruckman
We lack pace around the ground
Same blokes are too soft
A win is better than a loss
Weitering saved the day
3 votes


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:28 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2019 5:51 pm
Posts: 1062
jake_h03 wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Jonosc1 wrote:
We won.
No idea how.
We didn’t deserve it.

But hey it’s nice to win one where we played horrible for 3 quarters


I'll have to disagree...we butchered both tempo and decision making I50 in that 3rd qtr. Shouldve been at least 5 goals up at 3 quarter time


Agree. We won pretty much every stat in the book, except for Inside 50 efficiency. Basically we got stuck into the lazy habit of bombing it in and expecting Charlie and Harry to do the rest and then didn't have enough impact from the small forwards at ground level. Also when we did actually have guys open inside 50, we botched a lot of the chances with simple skill errors.

Hard to say we didn't deserve to win though.



Don’t get me wrong, I loved the fight in the last 5 minutes. In reality we played 1/4 and a bit of footy. We won’t win too many games doing that.
I thought we were lazy, but maybe we were just cooked.
We did have a 9 day break though, so I’m wondering.

I’m sure Voss will review hard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17414
Location: Left Cuckistan
The other glaring one for me, TDK, for all his weapons, really needs to get some intensity after the first effort. I reckon I saw at least three times where he tried for the first contest but once outside his sphere of influence he was notably walking/not involved.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:10 am
Posts: 1495
The way Motlop has played today he must be close to getting a game. He’s what we need


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:43 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 8942
Location: Melbourne
FarmerBlue wrote:
The way Motlop has played today he must be close to getting a game. He’s what we need


Just came to post this. 4 goals from 17 touches and 4 tackles to go with it. I like all of Owies, Durdin, and Fisher, and they're all probably doing just enough to keep their place in the team, but collectively we're not getting enough at ground level in our forward 50. We need a bit more spark. Motlop looks like the type of player who can turn a game and kick a bag, as is Jack Martin

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:46 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7261
jake_h03 wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Jonosc1 wrote:
We won.
No idea how.
We didn’t deserve it.

But hey it’s nice to win one where we played horrible for 3 quarters


I'll have to disagree...we butchered both tempo and decision making I50 in that 3rd qtr. Shouldve been at least 5 goals up at 3 quarter time


Agree. We won pretty much every stat in the book, except for Inside 50 efficiency. Basically we got stuck into the lazy habit of bombing it in and expecting Charlie and Harry to do the rest and then didn't have enough impact from the small forwards at ground level. Also when we did actually have guys open inside 50, we botched a lot of the chances with simple skill errors.

Hard to say we didn't deserve to win though.

We most definitely deserved to win... we won most of the stats including 18 more inside 50's

To Hawthorn's credit they identified why they found themselves 6 goals down and dropped some numbers back.

We needed to find another option to goal and put the game to bed... maybe Martin?

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 5:55 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 8942
Location: Melbourne
Hornet wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Jonosc1 wrote:
We won.
No idea how.
We didn’t deserve it.

But hey it’s nice to win one where we played horrible for 3 quarters


I'll have to disagree...we butchered both tempo and decision making I50 in that 3rd qtr. Shouldve been at least 5 goals up at 3 quarter time


Agree. We won pretty much every stat in the book, except for Inside 50 efficiency. Basically we got stuck into the lazy habit of bombing it in and expecting Charlie and Harry to do the rest and then didn't have enough impact from the small forwards at ground level. Also when we did actually have guys open inside 50, we botched a lot of the chances with simple skill errors.

Hard to say we didn't deserve to win though.

We most definitely deserved to win... we won most of the stats including 18 more inside 50's

To Hawthorn's credit they identified why they found themselves 6 goals down and dropped some numbers back.

We needed to find another option to goal and put the game to bed... maybe Martin?


Martin should have played. Almost felt like a bit arrogant to not play him. We're not good enough to leave out players of his ability. And if he wasn't 100% he shouldn't have been sub, he could have been on in the first 5 mins

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 6:01 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4544
Location: lygon street
We found a way when it looked lost. Hawthorn had ask the momentum, yet we found a way to win and hold on.

Some worrying things. The fumbling. The amount of time we fumbled was shocking.
The bombing in long ad nauseum. Jiath and Sicily had field day. Really played into their hands.
A number of players down on previous weeks. Cerra, Kennedy a bit down. Boyd out of his depth. Fisher average game. LOB average. Setterfield average. Charlie and Harry limited impact after a massive start.

Despite all that we won when am looked lost thanks to some brilliant individual efforts. Doc and Weiters brilliant. Harry huge contested mark on the wing. Jack kept trying all day and kicked important goals. Hewett was huge. Cripps willed himself into the contest in the last.

We found a way to win. We're 3-0 and 3rd on the ladder and it's good to discuss a 'bad' win

_________________
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 6:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:04 am
Posts: 19
Just home from the game.

I'll admit, on the trip home I wasn't sure whether to be happy for the win, or disappointed that we lost it for a while there and let be become so close.

But in the end, I cheered pretty loudly at the one point win, in front of an energised crowd, and we're 3-0, so I'll cheer the win!

Honestly, when Hawthorn hit the lead I thought we were toast, and credit to Jack, Walsh, Curnow for getting us up in the end, and not folding.

Yes, the team went wobbly for a while, and even Cripps had some absolute shockers in the second half. But I'm confident Voss will make this one a "teachable moment" for a lot of players. So if we get the 4 points *and* learn something from it, win-win. (But yes, if this turns out to be the start of another year of "down hill skiers", not so good... time will tell.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 6:11 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2016 1:04 pm
Posts: 1191
Location: Brisbane
Using a cricket term, you dont draw it in the book!

3rd on the ladder baby

Go Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 6:13 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:59 am
Posts: 1971
All I wanted at the start of the season is a side that is competitive week in week out. Games where we win some and lose some, but are always in the contest. So any year I'd take 3 wins from 3 starts. Sometimes you win games where you probably shouldn't of, today was one of those games. Lots to like and as many areas of improvement. Great game of football to watch. Let's move on to next week and the Suns up north, with steady heads.

_________________
Blue is the colour, Blue is our colourful conversation, football is the game, talking carlton is our aim, we're all together, we're all together, winning is our aim, arguing is a pain, let's debate for gain. .. .!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 6:14 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 1:54 pm
Posts: 415
After the shit we have endured over the last 20 yrs, I’ll take any win no matter how ugly. 3-0 better than 0-3 .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 6:17 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13155
Location: Melbourne
kingkerna wrote:
I'm glass half full, Hawks hit the lead at ten minute mark of the last. Many would have expected us to fold and lose by 5 goals.

Instead we found a way.


That was me although I said we'd lose by 4 goals at that point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 6:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1285
Location: Melbourne
TheBluesMuse wrote:
To be 3-0, especially considering our opponents, has far exceeded my expectations.

I nearly passed out my heart was pumping so hard and fast..... I can't deal with the emotions I'm feeling right now. I'm trying to keep a lid on it but internally I know how important it is to keep finding ways to win and I'm scared of the disappointment that comes from a loss.

I thought Jack was immense. He seemed to be the only forward that kept moving and presenting. What a good story he is becoming. He just tries his guts out.

That’s exactly how I feel. Twenty years of football PTSD makes it hard to relax when your opponent has momentum and is coming. We could have lost all 3, but we’ve won all 3. That’s got to speak volumes more than luck

That first quarter was flawless. Smashed them in and under, one touch precision football with not a single fumble, and inside 50 marking and kicking that was out of this world. Breathtaking. Hawks lifted intensity, blocked the corridor, played their zones well, and rebounded brilliantly.

Last quarter heroes. Silvagni for the clutch goal, Doc for defensive zoning and marking under pressure, Harry for that big pack mark on the wing, and especially Weiters for that crunch chest mark running back into traffic. Just magnificent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 6:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20167
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Jiath was best on ground for mine. I thought he created virtually every goal for hawthorn after qtr time and we played right into his hands.

Hawthorn really took on the 45 kick through the corridor and it paid dividends. We played over and around our midfield after quarter time, we thought that 6 f50 marks in a quarter was how it was going to be. Needed more avenues to goal than the big guys.

That said...

What intent. The lethargic starts are gone (replaced by lethargic 3rd quarters!!) and that first quarter was pure domination and beautiful to watch.

I like what we're building, and we've won three games in 3 different ways now. Underpinning each though has been the heart and fight that we have lacked for years.

Loved it.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2022 6:53 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8119
Pros:

1st half.
The big boys. Charlie and Harry were terrific. Weiters best game for the year. SOJ was influential. Young impressed me.
Centre clearances. Cripps and Hewett again.
Docherty.
Durdin.
Liked Setterfield's 1st half.

Cons:

Faded again.
Butchered the ball going forward after quarter time.
Too many broken tackles.
There's a lot of rebound against us, when we're playing Harry, Charlie, TDK and SOJ in the same forwardline. I like that we're getting games into TDK, but reckon we would have been far better balanced with Martin down there instead.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 88 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group