Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 5:44 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 214 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 6:44 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Players deserve more than one game to prove themselves, the slate is clean under team Voss, can't see LOB getting dropped.

Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 6:50 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 8938
Location: Melbourne
kingkerna wrote:
Players deserve more than one game to prove themselves, the slate is clean under team Voss, can't see LOB getting dropped.

Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk


Agree. They won’t drop him after one game especially after a win and especially when the effort was there. However, it will take a significant performance for him to not be the one that makes way when Walsh returns


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 6:54 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Games since Carlton last had a new coach? 1

Aren’t we blessed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 7:26 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:20 pm
Posts: 1806
Blue Vain wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
May I ask the love for Setterfielsd, LOB give more run and is a better kick.


Thursday night- Setterfield 16 possessions, O'Brien 13.
Disposal efficiency, Setterfield 87.5%, O'Brien 61.5%
Metres gained, Setterfield 240m, O'Brien 188
Shit his pants under pressure, Setterfield 0, O'Brien 3.

Setterfields disposals were far more creative than O'Briens.


Yep.
And Voss wouldn't have missed the shitting himself part.
If we had paid pick 110 for him people would be far more willing to accept he is no good.
Martin testing positive may have given him a reprieve for a week but i hope not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 8:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17936
O'Briens opponent was one of the better players on the ground in the first 20 minutes. To the point that the had to be moved to the other wing.
I don't buy this "cant change a winning team" stuff. You should be looking to improve every week. Whether you win or not. If you have a non contributor, you don't retain them because you have a win. Reward the players in the VFL who are performing to expectation.
The slate was clean 6 months ago. Not now.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 8:21 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Blue Vain wrote:
O'Briens opponent was one of the better players on the ground in the first 20 minutes. To the point that the had to be moved to the other wing.
I don't buy this "cant change a winning team" stuff. You should be looking to improve every week. Whether you win or not. If you have a non contributor, you don't retain them because you have a win. Reward the players in the VFL who are performing to expectation.
The slate was clean 6 months ago. Not now.
Drop Charlie avd Harry by that logic

Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 8:23 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
daggs001 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
May I ask the love for Setterfielsd, LOB give more run and is a better kick.


Thursday night- Setterfield 16 possessions, O'Brien 13.
Disposal efficiency, Setterfield 87.5%, O'Brien 61.5%
Metres gained, Setterfield 240m, O'Brien 188
Shit his pants under pressure, Setterfield 0, O'Brien 3.

Setterfields disposals were far more creative than O'Briens.


Yep.
And Voss wouldn't have missed the shitting himself part.
If we had paid pick 110 for him people would be far more willing to accept he is no good.
Martin testing positive may have given him a reprieve for a week but i hope not.


Actually, the point I was making was that both could go for Carroll and Dow. Neither had any real influence on the wings and they aren't raw recruits. Time to try something else.

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 8:54 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Blue Vain wrote:
Carroll for O'Brien. :cool:


This is an interesting one because Newnes played on the wing in the VFL game, which indicates he is the back up wingman if we decide to drop LOB. Until Walsh returns, it may be a choice between LOB and Newnes.

Carroll’s bread & butter seems to be on the inside (although he appears to have some inside/outside balance in his game). It wouldn’t surprise me if Voss takes the same approach to Carroll as he is with Dow, ie. pick him when there is a role in the team that suits his game.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:44 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2698
aboynamedsue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Carroll for O'Brien. :cool:


This is an interesting one because Newnes played on the wing in the VFL game, which indicates he is the back up wingman if we decide to drop LOB. Until Walsh returns, it may be a choice between LOB and Newnes.

Carroll’s bread & butter seems to be on the inside (although he appears to have some inside/outside balance in his game). It wouldn’t surprise me if Voss takes the same approach to Carroll as he is with Dow, ie. pick him when there is a role in the team that suits his game.


Yes and that would be supported by my reading of Voss' statements re players roles. Dow as an inside midfielder will not be placed on the wing. He will be used where his strengths are and where he is most likely to succeed. I think Carroll did spend some time on the wing though in the internal praccy games. I could be wrong though. Who played on the other wing in the reserves against Richmond? Was it Cottrell?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 9:22 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3560
daggs001 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
May I ask the love for Setterfielsd, LOB give more run and is a better kick.


Thursday night- Setterfield 16 possessions, O'Brien 13.
Disposal efficiency, Setterfield 87.5%, O'Brien 61.5%
Metres gained, Setterfield 240m, O'Brien 188
Shit his pants under pressure, Setterfield 0, O'Brien 3.

Setterfields disposals were far more creative than O'Briens.


Yep.
And Voss wouldn't have missed the shitting himself part.
If we had paid pick 110 for him people would be far more willing to accept he is no good.
Martin testing positive may have given him a reprieve for a week but i hope not.


Do you honestly think this is a SHOCK to Vossy (that he is suspect under pressure). The fact that he's playing in front of Dow, Carrol, Newnes and Philp, and the fact that Voss has had 5 months to look at him on the training track and the fact that he crumbled a few times in the praccy match tells me Voss is more open to giving him opportunities or giving him specific things to work on...I don't know what they are and purely guessing

I'm neither a harsh critic nor a huge fan of LOBs, just for the record...what I am is infinitely more confident of the "behind closed doors" rationale for playing LOB than I would've been with our previous "NFI with selection" coach

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 12:56 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7148
99prelim wrote:
daggs001 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
May I ask the love for Setterfielsd, LOB give more run and is a better kick.


Thursday night- Setterfield 16 possessions, O'Brien 13.
Disposal efficiency, Setterfield 87.5%, O'Brien 61.5%
Metres gained, Setterfield 240m, O'Brien 188
Shit his pants under pressure, Setterfield 0, O'Brien 3.

Setterfields disposals were far more creative than O'Briens.


Yep.
And Voss wouldn't have missed the shitting himself part.
If we had paid pick 110 for him people would be far more willing to accept he is no good.
Martin testing positive may have given him a reprieve for a week but i hope not.


Do you honestly think this is a SHOCK to Vossy (that he is suspect under pressure). The fact that he's playing in front of Dow, Carrol, Newnes and Philp, and the fact that Voss has had 5 months to look at him on the training track and the fact that he crumbled a few times in the praccy match tells me Voss is more open to giving him opportunities or giving him specific things to work on...I don't know what they are and purely guessing

I'm neither a harsh critic nor a huge fan of LOBs, just for the record...what I am is infinitely more confident of the "behind closed doors" rationale for playing LOB than I would've been with our previous "NFI with selection" coach


Thats really good stuff " 99 " ..............Reckon Voss is over everything and not one scintilla escapes the bloke . No one pulls the wool over this blokes eyes . I have complete faith in the bloke .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 2:11 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:52 pm
Posts: 1857
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
May I ask the love for Setterfielsd, LOB give more run and is a better kick.


Because Setterfield is playing a different role. He is a defensive wing at the moment and his role is to hold the width to protect the opposition switching to the other side. Plus then double back in defence when the opposition has the ball and help out inside the defensive 50.

Its the role Kamdyn Mcintosh played so well for Richmond for years.

Not everything has to be about "run and carry and delivery inside 50". You need role players and I thought Setters was really good in his role for the team on Thursday night, so he stays in.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 3:39 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:19 am
Posts: 2186
Location: Melbourne
Mickstar wrote:
99prelim wrote:
daggs001 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
May I ask the love for Setterfielsd, LOB give more run and is a better kick.


Thursday night- Setterfield 16 possessions, O'Brien 13.
Disposal efficiency, Setterfield 87.5%, O'Brien 61.5%
Metres gained, Setterfield 240m, O'Brien 188
Shit his pants under pressure, Setterfield 0, O'Brien 3.

Setterfields disposals were far more creative than O'Briens.


Yep.
And Voss wouldn't have missed the shitting himself part.
If we had paid pick 110 for him people would be far more willing to accept he is no good.
Martin testing positive may have given him a reprieve for a week but i hope not.


Do you honestly think this is a SHOCK to Vossy (that he is suspect under pressure). The fact that he's playing in front of Dow, Carrol, Newnes and Philp, and the fact that Voss has had 5 months to look at him on the training track and the fact that he crumbled a few times in the praccy match tells me Voss is more open to giving him opportunities or giving him specific things to work on...I don't know what they are and purely guessing

I'm neither a harsh critic nor a huge fan of LOBs, just for the record...what I am is infinitely more confident of the "behind closed doors" rationale for playing LOB than I would've been with our previous "NFI with selection" coach


Thats really good stuff " 99 " ..............Reckon Voss is over everything and not one scintilla escapes the bloke . No one pulls the wool over this blokes eyes . I have complete faith in the bloke .


Is this the first time the word 'scintilla' has been used on TC? If so, well done :smoking:

Go Blues!

_________________
Our tradition demands success!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 4:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17936
carntheblues wrote:
I think Carroll did spend some time on the wing though in the internal praccy games. I could be wrong though.


Correct. Carroll played wing against the Saints and had he not injured himself, I'd suggest he would have played there Round 1.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 4:27 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:09 pm
Posts: 5817
Blue Vain wrote:
carntheblues wrote:
I think Carroll did spend some time on the wing though in the internal praccy games. I could be wrong though.


Correct. Carroll played wing against the Saints and had he not injured himself, I'd suggest he would have played there Round 1.

It seems we have a defensive wing in Setterfield and an attacking wing in LOB.
I presume Newnes and Cottrell would be earmarked as defensive wings?
Would Carroll play attacking?

_________________
░L░I░N░K░I░N░B░I░O ░


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 5:07 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Blue Vain wrote:
carntheblues wrote:
I think Carroll did spend some time on the wing though in the internal praccy games. I could be wrong though.


Correct. Carroll played wing against the Saints and had he not injured himself, I'd suggest he would have played there Round 1.

Carroll did not play against the Saints. LOB & Setterfield were our starting wingmen in both preseason games and in round one.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 6:48 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10461
Nick wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
May I ask the love for Setterfielsd, LOB give more run and is a better kick.


Because Setterfield is playing a different role. He is a defensive wing at the moment and his role is to hold the width to protect the opposition switching to the other side. Plus then double back in defence when the opposition has the ball and help out inside the defensive 50.

Its the role Kamdyn Mcintosh played so well for Richmond for years.

Not everything has to be about "run and carry and delivery inside 50". You need role players and I thought Setters was really good in his role for the team on Thursday night, so he stays in.


Well said Nick. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 7:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17936
aboynamedsue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
carntheblues wrote:
I think Carroll did spend some time on the wing though in the internal praccy games. I could be wrong though.


Correct. Carroll played wing against the Saints and had he not injured himself, I'd suggest he would have played there Round 1.

Carroll did not play against the Saints. LOB & Setterfield were our starting wingmen in both preseason games and in round one.


You're right, my memory is failing me. :mad:
He was injured before the Saints game. He was on the wing in the intra-club match.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:29 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2017 3:40 pm
Posts: 893
real chance against this side and to go 2 - 0

its only early in the season, but i have genuine optimism with our midfield set up, which has a flow on effect around the game. (I really cant sing the praises of Hewitt/Cerra to out set up enough, enormous difference - Recruiting get a massive tick from me)

carlton by 4 goals.

they seem to really struggle without bruce going forward ..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:48 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2736
We should get some reasonably current intel from Ash Hansen, right?
I feel like we have the defensive capabilities to match their forwards.
Our forwards will need to lift.
The battle will be won or lost in the midfield which will be a great challenge.
My hope is that, win or lose, we (continue to) win respect for how we go about it.
I want to come out of this feeling like we are really moving forward.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 214 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bender, Google Adsense [Bot] and 71 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group