Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 10, 2025 2:59 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 133 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:09 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Fair few posters popping in for the first time this year!
Great to see.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:35 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:42 pm
Posts: 368
Location: Carlton
Agro jr wrote:
paul_h wrote:
Agro jr wrote:
Cyclonus wrote:
Went into game week with reasonably high expectations, but like many others lost all hope once I saw the team named. Too tall, no forward target, and bursting at the seams with one-paced taggers. And as usual, the glaring imbalance was apparent to basically all fans I talked to, but not to those running the club.

After seeing the absolute lack of intensity and fitness on Thursday night, I knew I had vastly overestimated our chances for 2015. To then read that our VFL team - complete with 16 AFL-listed players - was soundly beaten by a Box Hill side sporting none... well that's as bleak of an indication for our future as I can imagine.

A finish of 17th with only St Kilda below us is a very, very real possibility. I saw nothing over the weekend to suggest that GWS or Melbourne are behind us anymore, and the Dogs have bolted and left us in the dust.



I agree. For me we are the 17th best team in the competition.

Went to both the Gold Coast v Melbourne game as well as WB v WCE. All 4 of those teams are well ahead of us. They all have a midfield for one, which we simply don't have. We're bereft of decent players after Murphy and Gibbs (who are probably the two most average 'best' players from a club in the league).

Whilst those 4 teams mentioned still lack match winning KPP's to some extent, you can still win games and be competitive from your midfield.

When we lack BOTH decent KPP's and a midfield then it makes things very difficult.

We MIGHT beat West Coast on Friday purely because they're missing Mackenzie and now Mitch Brown, but as usual we won't know how to expose those deficiencies and use it to our advantage.

Honestly what confirmed 'where we were at' for me was when we drafted Liam Jones.


Our midfield is better than that of Melbourne and West Coast. I'll give you Dogs and Suns



Thinking about maybe us and West Coast are on par with one another. (We're both pretty poor after our couple of best players).

Melbourne's on the other hand I think is better, their younger crop of mids is better than ours. Salem, Tyson, Viney as opposed to our younger crop; Cripps (not sure who else makes up our younger crop). Even Brayshaw came out and imposed himself on the game, led the tackles with 9 and was subbed off at 3 quarter time.

Nathan Jones is a year younger than Marc Murphy. Jones just about personifies what it means to be a captain of a football club, Murphy not so much.

I want to believe that we are better than Melbourne, but at the moment I'm struggling to see why.


I thought we were talking about midfield at this point in time and not potential midfield. Apart from jones (vince and cross aren't much chop), those boys are far too green to actually be a sustainable force this season. Judd, Gibbs, Murphy, Carrazzo, Cripps, Curnow, Thomas (when he returns) are more desirable than a bunch of 19/20 year olds

_________________
'too young to remember 95', have envied other clubs since'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 10:31 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:36 am
Posts: 193
Have genuinely thought we'll finish 2015 in the bottom 4, and thursday night's performance simply confirmed my beliefs, didn't see every game of the weekend but from what I did see I think we were in the bottom 3 performed sides..... no surprise for me......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 10:34 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24631
Location: Kaloyasena
Time to add a red yoke to my colour palette, buy a tweed jacket with leather elbow patches and perfect the "go number 9" chant, methinks


:oops:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:11 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:54 pm
Posts: 2521
Pre-season I predicted Richmond to challenge for the top 4 and I predicted us to finish a couple games outside of the 8. So the result Thursday didn't surprise me. Despite visiting the 'best 22' thread and analyzing our recruiting over the offseason, it's still an eye opener to see the lack of midfield talent we are developing.
In answer to the question, yeah it confirmed where we are at (a 10-14 team most likely), but more scarily it showed where we are going to be over the next few years too (not progressing far).

_________________
@cecil_anderson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:25 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
I don't get understand why anyone thinks Richmond will challenge top 4?

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:25 am 
Offline
formerly Army the Wonderkid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 2058
Location: The Burbs
I didn't expect much this year but our lack of run and drive from defence was a real worry. It was like there was no plan other than to kick to the covered tall timber and / or only one designated runner. Very disappointing to watch.

The injury didn't help of course.

But to move to an extra tall in the second quarter seemed to be at odds with the run being a problem.

_________________
Formerly: Ackland the Wonderkid / Army the Wonderkid / quivering mess / molsey / Tony Lynn Fan Club


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:32 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:54 pm
Posts: 2521
dane wrote:
I don't get understand why anyone thinks Richmond will challenge top 4?


They finished last season so strongly that you've got to figure they have some talent there, although they played their final in round 23 and got smashed in the elimination final as a result.

Deledio, Cotchin & Martin are classy players through the midfield and with Miles, Ellis and Vlastuin they've got some talent building below. Rance and Riewoldt are good bookends and Chaplin and Griffiths are capable 2nd men. Maric is a quality ruck too. Age wise i think that list is about to hit its peak too. 14-15 wins doesn't seem out of the question.

_________________
@cecil_anderson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:32 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
I think we got beat for a few reasons.

This includes:

DT injury forcing Smith to come on way way way too early.
Losing DT's run.
Tutt not being selected in Smith's place (purely on fitness).
Injury to KJ killed him.
Yarran played chunk of game injured.
Murphy and Gibbs both underdone. I'd say they're both still feeling their injuries.
Everitt had a bad night.
Casboult is a required player for marking and crashing packs.
Too many taggers (play Carrazzo positively or not at all)

_________________
dane's trolling again


Last edited by dane on Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:34 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Richmond won't be top 4, and if we're going off of week 1 form, North, Geelong, us and a bunch of other clubs are cooked. I don't think that's quite true.

Let's see how we respond first. I think there's methodology in our recruitment and Jones is not meant to be some sort of answer to all of our forward line prayers. Other players need to pull their finger out and Mick probably needs to shift the methodology a little bit.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:45 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
dane wrote:
I think we got beat for a few reasons.

This includes:

DT injury forcing Smith to come on way way way too early.
Losing DT's run.
Tutt not being selected in Smith's place (purely on fitness).
Injury to KJ killed him.
Yarran played chunk of game injured.
Murphy and Gibbs both underdone. I'd say they're both still feeling their injuries.
Everitt had a bad night.
Casboult is a required player for marking and crashing packs.
Too many taggers (play Carrazzo positively or not at all)

I've said this a few times, but Carrazzo, Murphy, Simpson, Judd and Gibbs all played about 10-15 mins less game time than they normally would.

Everybody else had to pick up the slack of that as well as the loss of Thomas. Smith played as much game time as Gibbs, Murphy and Judd.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:50 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21527
Location: North of the border
dane wrote:
I don't get understand why anyone thinks Richmond will challenge top 4?

They finished with 14 wins in 2013 thanks to a very favorable draw.
Last year when the season was shot they came home like a train to win 9 in a row.
Its fools gold kind of thing and Blues supporters got sucked in with our late season form.
It easy to win when the season is shot and you can throw caution to the wind.
Its a lot harder to win when it counts.
Early season wins and finals
Richmond are masters at it . It gives their supporters hope and they sign on in droves thinking that next year will be there year.
Another reasonable draw for them and another bottom of the 8 finish is on the cards

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:52 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Sydney Blue wrote:
dane wrote:
I don't get understand why anyone thinks Richmond will challenge top 4?

They finished with 14 wins in 2013 thanks to a very favorable draw.
Last year when the season was shot they came home like a train to win 9 in a row.
Its fools gold kind of thing and Blues supporters got sucked in with our late season form.
It easy to win when the season is shot and you can throw caution to the wind.
Its a lot harder to win when it counts.
Early season wins and finals
Richmond are masters at it . It gives their supporters hope and they sign on in droves thinking that next year will be there year.
Another reasonable draw for them and another bottom of the 8 finish is on the cards


Something we agree on!
:thumbsup:

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:02 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:54 pm
Posts: 2521
If they win 14 games again then they're going to spend a considerable amount of the season competing for a top 4 spot. I don't see them as a premiership team, but they're capable of 14 wins.
Anyway, my original point was that Richmond are highly likely to finish the season comfortably in front of us, so it did not surprise me to see them beat us. There's been a significant over reaction to that loss IMO.

_________________
@cecil_anderson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:15 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1623
We need 4 to 6 weeks, to get the team firing, sort out the Rucks , find some run and who 'll kick the goals . Some significant injuries and personal changes have set us back. The team is evolving.
Not all is lost and Richmond are not finalist in 2015.
Go Baggers, Ciao

_________________
Go Blue Boys


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:33 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
I'm struggling to see how one bad week can completely erase any headway we made last year in terms of attitude & intent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
bmaurizio wrote:
Not all is lost and Richmond are not finalist in 2015.


If that is the case then we are more screwed than I thought. If we were clearly out played by a team that has no chance of making the 8 then ALL is lost. #wearefarked2015

This game against West Coast then Essendon* will tell us where we are at.

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:50 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Need to win both!

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 1:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18008
Who would have a clue where we are at?
Patrick Cripps wouldnt. He was our best performed player in the NAB challenge and he couldnt get a look in the centre square Thursday. The kid has just come offf 32 possessions, strong tackles and clearances against Geelong and they dont have faith in him to play in the middle. :?
Weak as piss. I'd rather win 6 games playing the youngsters where they can develop than win 10 games running multiple taggers and leaving players like Cripps on a half forward flank.
At least give the kid a shot before shitting yourself and playing 4 taggers.

If we werent going to play Cripps on ball, it would be better to play Tutt forward. At least he would know how to make Houli etc accountable.
As for the misguided theory that Cripps cant get the ball on the spread, he had more uncontested possessions than anyone else against the Cats.
He was also our best tackler. I fail to see what message the players are having sent when decisions like this are made.
Same for the members/supporters. If I could see the players are being developed and receiving every opportunity, a transparent vision, I'd understand.
But to lose a game after playing ultra defensive without giving performing, in form players like Cripps a shot first, pathetic.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 1:46 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
frank dardew wrote:
I think that Thursday night was about how close I thought we would get before the game but. Watching the other games has been alarming in terms of where we are
Apart from North did any other team give their supporters less hope than our performance on Thursday night
Early call but have dogs and dees gone past us and in terms of personnel is our list really only better than Aints and maybe GWS
I know it's early but do we see another 0-3 or 0-4 start and even if it is 1-3 can we recover with this group
I'm generally positive and take two of my family every week but all of us on Thursday were demoralised and thought our short and medium term future is bleak
Not their fault but for instance does any other club have as weak ruck combo as wood and Rowe

Does any other club have a forward line that seems so impotent

Sorry to be negative but going to Cats and Hawthorn today and am sick of them dominating and us being in the ordinary also-ran category



Before the season I thought our list is that of probably a 12th to 16th side and Thursday night very much confirmed that.

From an overall list perspective in terms of winning a flag I think we are along with the Saints in the worst position, West Coast also miles off.

GWS have loads of young talent, as do the dogs and even the demons. We may finish above these 3 sides this year but we wont next year.

Our list profile is absolutely horrible so I would think we will have a really tough time in 2015, 16 and 17.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 133 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Mickstar and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group