Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 12, 2025 10:59 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 705 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 36  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:20 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
club29 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:
Hi Synbad, After going on about the victim mentality of the club and how stupid some are blaming umpires (amongst other things) how do you feel about Malthouse blaming the umps in a press conference no less? Using stats to back up his argument too?
How do you feel??

I need to know.

What's taking you so long??
...haha

Seriously though what are your thoughts on that? To me it seems to be something you have been against for a long time. For the record I didn't like it. The stats part was ok though.



Hi club.. victim mentality is always blaming umpires after every loss.... and always using statistics to begin each sentence.. "kind of .. sort of"
M althouse knows when stats come out....he des have a wider repetoire of media fronts than say his predecessor?
Second how did Bryce go in the midfield ??
Third.. Are you happy with the shape of the list Malthouse has inherited from Ratten??...
What do you think of Rattens list management??.. of thats right.. Malthouse wasted a year... :lol:


Thank you for your prompt reply.

I have not mentioned Ratts so I am not sure why you are bringing him up. For the record I have not been happy with the list and the people who put it together to me have got it wrong and it was their undoing. I have said that a million times to you. I am not sure why you asked that.

Bryce played a very good game in our midfield on the weekend. He proved he can do things I doubted he could. He has a few more things to do to convince me. Consistency, adapting to a tag and playing in a more congested situation because lets face it the hawks game was quite open around the packs. My other opinion re Bryce was we are better team with him defense. I am not sure my opinion there has been disproven. The move of Simpson to defense has softened the blow of losing Bryces smarts and sure hands from behind the ball but still has not netted us wins. Just the one with Bryce in the midfield this season against GWS. I am close to being proven wrong and will own up when it is conclusive not run and hide like you have done countless times over the years and even do in your first reply here.

I still feel Malthouse not making changes to the list ( the list you don't like ) at the end of last year was a mistake and a waste of a year. Carrying the extra ruck contract, the HBFers and those soft of mind and body another year is a waste. So I stand by describing this year as a waste.

Now that I have addressed your questions I think it would be only fair if you actually addressed questions fired at you instead of deflecting with more questions or going into your Ratts twitch that has no relevance.

He couldn't make changes as our moronic list management team headed by ratten signed up a heap of average players to contracts they never should of got


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:25 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
club you must mention ratts.. he is part of a context...
Quote:

In history's page, let every stage
.


or

Quote:
Australians all let us rejoice,
For we are young and free;
We've golden soil and wealth for toil;
Our home is girt by sea;
Our land abounds in nature's gifts
Of beauty rich and rare;
In history's page, let every stage
Advance Australia Fair.
In joyful strains then let us sing,
Advance Australia Fair.


context my dear club...history must always be played within a context... or it means nothing....!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:34 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Bigredisback wrote:
club29 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:
Hi Synbad, After going on about the victim mentality of the club and how stupid some are blaming umpires (amongst other things) how do you feel about Malthouse blaming the umps in a press conference no less? Using stats to back up his argument too?
How do you feel??

I need to know.

What's taking you so long??
...haha

Seriously though what are your thoughts on that? To me it seems to be something you have been against for a long time. For the record I didn't like it. The stats part was ok though.



Hi club.. victim mentality is always blaming umpires after every loss.... and always using statistics to begin each sentence.. "kind of .. sort of"
M althouse knows when stats come out....he des have a wider repetoire of media fronts than say his predecessor?
Second how did Bryce go in the midfield ??
Third.. Are you happy with the shape of the list Malthouse has inherited from Ratten??...
What do you think of Rattens list management??.. of thats right.. Malthouse wasted a year... :lol:


Thank you for your prompt reply.

I have not mentioned Ratts so I am not sure why you are bringing him up. For the record I have not been happy with the list and the people who put it together to me have got it wrong and it was their undoing. I have said that a million times to you. I am not sure why you asked that.

Bryce played a very good game in our midfield on the weekend. He proved he can do things I doubted he could. He has a few more things to do to convince me. Consistency, adapting to a tag and playing in a more congested situation because lets face it the hawks game was quite open around the packs. My other opinion re Bryce was we are better team with him defense. I am not sure my opinion there has been disproven. The move of Simpson to defense has softened the blow of losing Bryces smarts and sure hands from behind the ball but still has not netted us wins. Just the one with Bryce in the midfield this season against GWS. I am close to being proven wrong and will own up when it is conclusive not run and hide like you have done countless times over the years and even do in your first reply here.

I still feel Malthouse not making changes to the list ( the list you don't like ) at the end of last year was a mistake and a waste of a year. Carrying the extra ruck contract, the HBFers and those soft of mind and body another year is a waste. So I stand by describing this year as a waste.

Now that I have addressed your questions I think it would be only fair if you actually addressed questions fired at you instead of deflecting with more questions or going into your Ratts twitch that has no relevance.

He couldn't make changes as our moronic list management team headed by ratten signed up a heap of average players to contracts they never should of got


You can trade contracted players. I am not talking about delisting Joseph and Davies. They were wrongly signed up but have no relevance to this discussion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:51 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm
Posts: 2251
big win v sydney on the scg in an arm wrestle would help the trust


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:53 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
doofdoof wrote:
big win v sydney on the scg in an arm wrestle would help the trust


And then some.

Its the only game I haven't been bullish on.

But I'm building some belief.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Blue Vain wrote:
Do you believe all this crap Sugarcane? :lol:
This is same bloke who hasnt openly said all players are not equal. Lesser lights are treated differently to star players.
And spare me the "pure honestly" crap.
This is the same bloke who blatantly lied about the Stephen Milne incident and was forced to apologise for trying to worm his way out of an incident instead of taking responsibility for his actions.

Yes Mick is doing a good job, yes Mick deserves some patience and support but spare me the Mother Teresa sermon.
Some of you people need to get a grasp of reality. Malthouse is a successful coach of years gone by and hopefully he can bring some success to Carlton but he has plenty of frailties as well.

If you're expecting something other than a footy football coach in his latter years of career you're going to be very disappointed because thats the reality.
He isnt the panacea sent to save our club. He is a small part of the puzzle.


Hey, hey, hang on a sec there BV.

All that bad stuff you mention was when he was at Collingwood.

Now he's at Carlton, he is pure as the driven snow! :razz:

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
club29 wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
club29 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:
Hi Synbad, After going on about the victim mentality of the club and how stupid some are blaming umpires (amongst other things) how do you feel about Malthouse blaming the umps in a press conference no less? Using stats to back up his argument too?
How do you feel??

I need to know.

What's taking you so long??
...haha

Seriously though what are your thoughts on that? To me it seems to be something you have been against for a long time. For the record I didn't like it. The stats part was ok though.



Hi club.. victim mentality is always blaming umpires after every loss.... and always using statistics to begin each sentence.. "kind of .. sort of"
M althouse knows when stats come out....he des have a wider repetoire of media fronts than say his predecessor?
Second how did Bryce go in the midfield ??
Third.. Are you happy with the shape of the list Malthouse has inherited from Ratten??...
What do you think of Rattens list management??.. of thats right.. Malthouse wasted a year... :lol:


Thank you for your prompt reply.

I have not mentioned Ratts so I am not sure why you are bringing him up. For the record I have not been happy with the list and the people who put it together to me have got it wrong and it was their undoing. I have said that a million times to you. I am not sure why you asked that.

Bryce played a very good game in our midfield on the weekend. He proved he can do things I doubted he could. He has a few more things to do to convince me. Consistency, adapting to a tag and playing in a more congested situation because lets face it the hawks game was quite open around the packs. My other opinion re Bryce was we are better team with him defense. I am not sure my opinion there has been disproven. The move of Simpson to defense has softened the blow of losing Bryces smarts and sure hands from behind the ball but still has not netted us wins. Just the one with Bryce in the midfield this season against GWS. I am close to being proven wrong and will own up when it is conclusive not run and hide like you have done countless times over the years and even do in your first reply here.

I still feel Malthouse not making changes to the list ( the list you don't like ) at the end of last year was a mistake and a waste of a year. Carrying the extra ruck contract, the HBFers and those soft of mind and body another year is a waste. So I stand by describing this year as a waste.

Now that I have addressed your questions I think it would be only fair if you actually addressed questions fired at you instead of deflecting with more questions or going into your Ratts twitch that has no relevance.

He couldn't make changes as our moronic list management team headed by ratten signed up a heap of average players to contracts they never should of got


You can trade contracted players. I am not talking about delisting Joseph and Davies. They were wrongly signed up but have no relevance to this discussion.



juddy???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:44 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
club29 wrote:
Bigredisback wrote:
club29 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:
Hi Synbad, After going on about the victim mentality of the club and how stupid some are blaming umpires (amongst other things) how do you feel about Malthouse blaming the umps in a press conference no less? Using stats to back up his argument too?
How do you feel??

I need to know.

What's taking you so long??
...haha

Seriously though what are your thoughts on that? To me it seems to be something you have been against for a long time. For the record I didn't like it. The stats part was ok though.



Hi club.. victim mentality is always blaming umpires after every loss.... and always using statistics to begin each sentence.. "kind of .. sort of"
M althouse knows when stats come out....he des have a wider repetoire of media fronts than say his predecessor?
Second how did Bryce go in the midfield ??
Third.. Are you happy with the shape of the list Malthouse has inherited from Ratten??...
What do you think of Rattens list management??.. of thats right.. Malthouse wasted a year... :lol:


Thank you for your prompt reply.

I have not mentioned Ratts so I am not sure why you are bringing him up. For the record I have not been happy with the list and the people who put it together to me have got it wrong and it was their undoing. I have said that a million times to you. I am not sure why you asked that.

Bryce played a very good game in our midfield on the weekend. He proved he can do things I doubted he could. He has a few more things to do to convince me. Consistency, adapting to a tag and playing in a more congested situation because lets face it the hawks game was quite open around the packs. My other opinion re Bryce was we are better team with him defense. I am not sure my opinion there has been disproven. The move of Simpson to defense has softened the blow of losing Bryces smarts and sure hands from behind the ball but still has not netted us wins. Just the one with Bryce in the midfield this season against GWS. I am close to being proven wrong and will own up when it is conclusive not run and hide like you have done countless times over the years and even do in your first reply here.

I still feel Malthouse not making changes to the list ( the list you don't like ) at the end of last year was a mistake and a waste of a year. Carrying the extra ruck contract, the HBFers and those soft of mind and body another year is a waste. So I stand by describing this year as a waste.

Now that I have addressed your questions I think it would be only fair if you actually addressed questions fired at you instead of deflecting with more questions or going into your Ratts twitch that has no relevance.

He couldn't make changes as our moronic list management team headed by ratten signed up a heap of average players to contracts they never should of got


You can trade contracted players. I am not talking about delisting Joseph and Davies. They were wrongly signed up but have no relevance to this discussion.

Can't trade contracted players nobody wants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
we actually did put players on the block.. the ruckmen...(not kreuzer) noone wanted them....

now sure who else we could have put up... malthouse did wanna look at them.. and we had players on contracts who we would have liked to delist,

if you want to play the blame game for the list.. try mckay...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:22 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4445
Location: Perth
I said this before the season. I'll warm to MM and trust the process when I see wins, wins and more wins.

Wins against sides we struggle with, wins against sides we should beat and wins when we are fully expected to win.

There has been some individual improvement but for mine the jury is out on whether we have actually improved overall. Still lose games we shouldn't and just can't take that next step.

Some might say but all our losses have been within 3 goals. For mine that misses the point, we have lost 6 games five of which we probably shouldn't of.

How can we be confident of winning our next close one?

Honourable losses don't cut it if we truly want to stamp ourselves as a legitimate on field force.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:42 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
The majority here seem very supportive of Mick from what I've seen. Personally I didn't want Malthouse as I thought he represented yet more flawed decision making by the club. An easy (but expensive) answer to a complex problem that coaching alone was never going to solve.

Also thought he was an egotistical bullshit artist but he's our egotistical bullshit artist now so I will support him and give him time to figure it out. Different process with mostly the same results so far though from where I'm sitting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:52 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:24 pm
Posts: 1354
MM is not my concern going forward ... our recruiting department is.

We have had too many misses with Talls ... they either lack aerial judgment, lack stcky fingers, lack ticker or have a major deficiency which stymies any positive they may have eg. very slow.

Then there is the midfield group ... many are mono paced which doesn't give us good spread and as a result their kicking is off as they have to kick in too much of a hurry. Their lack of standing start speed is really evident at the stoppages.

First touch ... many of our players don't have a strong first point of contact ... really shows up a tap out receives and when a team mate extracts a ball out quickly from a congested situation ... we drop what should be easy receives.

And then overall is our kicking deficiency ... we are not a good kicking team ... we lack kicking smarts ... especially kicking to advantage.

Hopefully this new recruiter from Geelong can add some nous.

Watched Collingwood the last few weeks ... they have introduced some new players the last two years ... most are small and this could be a strategy of Buckley ... difficult to acquire a set of good talls but easier to assemble a mosquito fleet. What I have noticed from this new group at Collingwood is they have speed with the ball, good first touch, speed and they are neat with the ball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:59 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21532
Location: North of the border
We are 6&6 sitting in 8th spot
Next week we will be 2 games behind richmond who are 7th with games coming up against swans pies and saints. 4 of the six games we have left we have to play sides that have already beat us
We will struggle to make the 8

Malthouse is not doing a good job dont care what anyone says


We are no better than last year with the midfield ageing

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 9:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 2288
Location: Bendigo
[quote="dadadadada"]MM is not my concern going forward ... our recruiting department is.

We have had too many misses with Talls ... they either lack aerial judgment, lack stcky fingers, lack ticker or have a major deficiency which stymies any positive they may have eg. very slow.

Then there is the midfield group ... many are mono paced which doesn't give us good spread and as a result their kicking is off as they have to kick in too much of a hurry. Their lack of standing start speed is really evident at the stoppages.

First touch ... many of our players don't have a strong first point of contact ... really shows up a tap out receives and when a team mate extracts a ball out quickly from a congested situation ... we drop what should be easy receives.

And then overall is our kicking deficiency ... we are not a good kicking team ... we lack kicking smarts ... especially kicking to advantage.

Hopefully this new recruiter from Geelong can add some nous.

Watched Collingwood the last few weeks ... they have introduced some new players the last two years ... most are small and this could be a strategy of Buckley ... difficult to acquire a set of good talls but easier to assemble a mosquito fleet. What I have noticed from this new group at Collingwood is they have speed with the ball, good first touch, speed and they are neat with the ball. [quote]

and they kick goals


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 9:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25065
Location: Bondi Beach
Sugarcane wrote:
And don't anyone tear down this post or merge it with another thread

Time will show Malthouse is worth every cent we pay him

This group of players are not by any means perfect but after just 12 games he has them busting their gut week in week out, he has instilled a dedication to give maximum effort ... and as a result we know with surety we are just 2-3 goals off the pace

And those who don't comform to the benchmark efforts and rules and expectations, regardless of your reputation you will be sidelined - make no mistake because this is about discipline and dedication and 'bare minimum standards'

First Laidler and Duigan then Waite and now Yarran and White and I don't care how good your first ten games were Jeff if you continue to let fear dominate your game you'll no doubt be next

Malthouse is sorting out the boys from the men and the girls from the boys

He is setting ground rules and in effect establishing the culture needed to one day be as clinical and professional as Sydney and Hawthorn etc

He speaks in clear, direct terms. He doesn't mince words. He speaks of a man whose been at the coal face for 30+ years as coach and has not just seen it all but has also proven he is an old dog who can learn new tricks

He understands too well it is a process because the process and time is needed to make this team Great again

He knows the ladder is at once misleading and a true reflection. Misleading because we are better than our ladder position says we are but true because at the end of the day, in practical terms we haven't won enough games...thus far ... He sees both the abstract and the reality

He knows the umpires killed us last night and he is prepared to use his high standing in the game to make a stern statement about this. He's standing up for our club!

The man, in my view hasn't said a wrong word in a presses or post match all year. He's been on the money the entire way.

He has improved individuals and the team in just 12 real games.

And the great thing is, he looks like he's just starting to get warmed up. It's time to knuckle down, pull the sleeves up, elbow to the grindstone or whatever the !@#$%& it is.

He knows what needs to be done.

Watch carefully. Just like at Collingwood he will simultaneously turn the list into a well drilled, hard nosed, dedicated unit, all the while bringing young men into the team. Before you know it he will bring in the new wave (Bootsma, Cachia and Levi now, soon Menzel, and my guess is Graham and Bucks Jnr shorlty, plus McCinnes).

He's a genius.

He has a challenge on his plate no doubt, but he wouldnt have it any other way now doubt. Something about climbing the mountain, the process.

He will be buoyed by Gibbs' great effort last night.

He will be driven by the need to turn Jeff and Yazz into men.

He knows Lucas has improved and is giving us great run but also needs to toughen up, but he knows now is not the time to bust the lads chops!

He is putting it together, assembling it. Bit by bit. Game by game.

When he said last week "we'll get THERE", strike me if he didnt say this with pure honesty. He knows where we are at. He knows it's within striking distance but some changes are needed to the list and to the culture, and he is making those changes in front of our very eyes.

Anyone who can't see this is !@#$%& blind.


Great post .

He has inherited a list which on paper looks good and lacks depth.

Sticks hired Ratts and Stick sacked Ratts for good reason.

MM is probably the most positive aspect to our club this year, followed by some individual players in a team game, then there's stuff which needs to be fixed...Rattens list, recruiters, board, membership dept and respect for the faithful.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 9:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25065
Location: Bondi Beach
Blue Vain wrote:
Do you believe all this crap Sugarcane? :lol:
This is same bloke who hasnt openly said all players are not equal. Lesser lights are treated differently to star players.
And spare me the "pure honestly" crap.
This is the same bloke who blatantly lied about the Stephen Milne incident and was forced to apologise for trying to worm his way out of an incident instead of taking responsibility for his actions.

Yes Mick is doing a good job, yes Mick deserves some patience and support but spare me the Mother Teresa sermon.
Some of you people need to get a grasp of reality. Malthouse is a successful coach of years gone by and hopefully he can bring some success to Carlton but he has plenty of frailties as well.

If you're expecting something other than a footy football coach in his latter years of career you're going to be very disappointed because thats the reality.
He isnt the panacea sent to save our club. He is a small part of the puzzle.


Who cares about Milne? Carlton supporters should only be focused on Carlton.
Don't let Milne side track you. Now if Milne is related to you....that's different, but still nothing to do with Carlton.

I think you missed the gist of the post. MM was hired by the same people who hired and fired Ratts.
Most can see the upgrade.
Ratten was embarrassing just as is Sticks as President.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 9:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25065
Location: Bondi Beach
club29 wrote:

What was with complaining about the umps in the media?? Is this what we have become??? He came across as a flower in those pressers. Not sure why seeing our club represented that way made some feel good.

More victim .


You just made my blood boil.....real bad.

Media, real Carlton supporters, Hawks supporters, enemy supporters all have said we got ripped off by the umpires in a huge way. Watch the apologies appear from Geishen next week. It cost us. We all would be happy campers if umpires didn't rip us off against Ess and Hawks. Didn't you.

It's about time someone stuck up for our club regarding the umpiring.
It's the first time I've heard him say boo against shit umpiring and it's been going on for years and yes we have been the victim of bad umpiring and I'm sick of it.

He cares...doesn't that move you? You make me so angry mate.

This is serious stuff....line in the sand. No one fears let alone respects Carlton much these days.
MM has more respect from the footy world than we do and I appreciate he will be heard.

Don't you respect the power his wisdom and stature has for our club?

Remember Hirdy when he copped the fine and how well they've been treated by umpires ever since?
The squeaky wheel gets the oil.

Show some respect for our club...right this minute I do not like one bit because I haven't got over the loss because of the umpires when we were also undermanned. The win would have proved that MM has made inroads with this list.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 9:53 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Post of the year
MM may not win us a premiership but we are competitive and hard with an aging list.
Unfortunately mm needs minimum another 3 or 4 years to rebuild/replace the midfield and key forwards
I just hope the board doesn't panic and force the recruiters to build this foundation on trading and mature age recruits. This is a coach who can develop kids


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 10:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25065
Location: Bondi Beach
teknodeejay wrote:
There's some contrasting things that happen in press conferences that have me wondering which is better.

Hird talks about the merit of a young 2nd gamer kicking 3 goals (2 of which were gifts and 1 which was a beautiful sailing shot from 50 on the run). He talks about him as the future of the club.

Malthouse doesn't commend any single player for their efforts. Robinson plays with a possible cracked shoulder. Simpson courageous. But to Malthouse there's no time for heroes. It's bamboozled me. My thoughts would be to at least acknowledge the courage of some outstanding individual contributions that set an example.

But then, one team won by 40 points, the other lost another winnable game where the umpiring infuriated quite a few on here (and Mick himself).

An interesting comparison nontheless.


I'm sure he gives every player their appraisal after each game.
I'm sure Robbo would be tickled pink with what MM said to Robbo post game
It would reflect our thoughts.

MM is making a statement IMO. Non negotiable s from each individual within the collective.
I'm glad he was able to put the focus back on th decision makers who impacted the outcome of the game. That's where the focus should have been because we were the better team on the night.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Jun 16, 2013 10:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Hawthorn must be loving our squealing at the umpiring.

Right now they know they have their foot on our throat. Their group knows they have us right where they want us.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 705 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 36  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Cazzesman, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group