london blue wrote:
Interesting that Bell hasn't been getting a game?
Just can't make sense of this!
Tom was as impressive as the next bloke vs GWS & Sydney. Then, for what I thought was load balancing reasons, he was sub against freo. Came on late in that game and as expected didn't do much (game was dead by that stage!). Then he is missing against the crows and not named this week?!?!
I would've thought that with what he brings to the table he would need to be a part of our first choice midfield group. We got mauled repeatedly last season against teams with big-bodied midfielders and it is an area we need to improve on to make progress this year. McLean's resurgence has helped in this area but Bell adds another dimension as he is more imposing physically and brings a lot more in athletic attributes compared to Brock.
Strange decision and one I cannot fathom at this stage...

Bell dominant in the 2 qtrs I saw yesterday, but also got reported.