Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 08, 2025 12:40 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 269 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:18 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
With all due respect bondi, Kreuzer as ruck/rover is how to get sacked a month into the season. :lol:

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:22 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
MM has tened to go towards the one ruckman model anyway. I can see him wanting to trade at least one ruck man and just using one in a game with back up from Casboult or similar.

With him its about midfield and rotations. The more the better.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17944
DocSherrin wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
Not sure why he'd be even watching to be honest.


Yeah, he's a legend, he'll be able to fix all issues with a wave of his wand, no need for any research.


It was a dead rubber dude. Gavin Brown is already there. Brett Ratten game plan..



Thats an interesting point.
Whats the Malthouse game plan? You cant necessarily transpose a game plan from one team to another. Collingwood were successful because they had midfielders with supreme endurance with a defensive mindset. Ours dont.
He had 2 key forwrads who were their bail out option going forward. We dont.
They also had success with a game style that other teams are now unravelling.

Pagan soon found out you cant bring a game plan and retrofit it into another side. His efforts to do so set us back years.
If Malthouse attempts it, it could be a recipe for disaster. Lets hope he has the sense to assess our list and play a gamestyle based on our strengths and weaknesses.
Although his ego may not allow that.

Perhaps Rattens game style may be assessed as the best for our list. Now that would be a laugh.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:10 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7261
Discipline is the first thing he would need to instill...

For too long, we've played like a country that's finally discovered democracy and they don't know what to do with it.

Put bluntly... this group needs a dictator to keep them in line.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
That was the same philosophy as what was had under Pagan... that and a culture of blind arrogance got us into our current predicament.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:16 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Blue Vain wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
sinbagger wrote:

Yeah, he's a legend, he'll be able to fix all issues with a wave of his wand, no need for any research.


It was a dead rubber dude. Gavin Brown is already there. Brett Ratten game plan..



Thats an interesting point.
Whats the Malthouse game plan? You cant necessarily transpose a game plan from one team to another. Collingwood were successful because they had midfielders with supreme endurance with a defensive mindset. Ours dont.
He had 2 key forwrads who were their bail out option going forward. We dont.
They also had success with a game style that other teams are now unravelling.

Pagan soon found out you cant bring a game plan and retrofit it into another side. His efforts to do so set us back years.
If Malthouse attempts it, it could be a recipe for disaster. Lets hope he has the sense to assess our list and play a gamestyle based on our strengths and weaknesses.
Although his ego may not allow that.

Perhaps Rattens game style may be assessed as the best for our list. Now that would be a laugh.

Freo before and after Lyon....think he has been able to implement his game style with the necessary tinkering given the pros and cons of their list as compared to the saints....

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:39 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
I suspect individual brilliance will be curtailed.

Malthouse's teams often seem to be made up of a lot of so-called "average" footballers
who are actually bloody good but play in a very regulated manner, (which is ultimately
more beneficial for the team.

I can live with that. We're obviously very good now at ripping teams to pieces, but we seem
to struggle if we can't do that and have to fight out a tight contested one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:36 pm
Posts: 1057
Location: melbourne
reckon micks first question to carlton will be, how can we get cloke here?
''TRY'' and trade players like warnock, hampson, ellard, garlett, simpson, russell


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: THE BEACH
ThePsychologist wrote:
MM has tened to go towards the one ruckman model anyway. I can see him wanting to trade at least one ruck man and just using one in a game with back up from Casboult or similar.

With him its about midfield and rotations. The more the better.


I reckon he's only ever had one decent ruckman on his list at the Pies. Be interesting to see what he does with 3.

_________________
I see you watching me watching you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35661
Location: Half back flank
I reckon one day while he's on the golf course Grant Thomas & Rod Butters will sack him

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Changes UNDER Malthouse
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:39 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
:garthp: thread

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 8:19 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17414
Location: Left Cuckistan
Some classic bookmarks in here.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:22 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24685
Location: Bondi Beach
jimmae wrote:
With all due respect bondi, Kreuzer as ruck/rover is how to get sacked a month into the season. :lol:


I remember your posts back in 2006 or was it 2007 (or both) when you were raving about this kid called Kreuzer who was too young to be drafted in the 2007 draft, and that we should wait for him rather than go for a ruckman or KP (Hansen I think) ahead of Gibbs and others in 2007.

I followed that kid Kreuzer, and saw him at Northern and yep I knew you were onto something. He was amazing with a huge engine...a sort of onballer.

Fastforward post knee reco, and I feel the game has gone past Kreuzer as a ruckman, and he really doesn't excite me too much as a FF either, but he might be able to play a Cloke like CHF role except he has one glaring weakness: he doesn't take contested marks. Period!

There's another issue and that is he isn't tall enough to compete with much taller ruckmen because he doesn't have a leap to get up high enough. That's the way I see it...and he's had plenty of time to come good post knee.

Yes he's damn good once the ball hits the turf, if the ball is in his path, but I think he has to be down there ruck roving to see more of this strength working for us and him. Hence, maybe, just maybe he's a ruck rover. If not...then I don't know if MM sees the benefit of a 200cm ruckman who doesn't take contested marks (like Wood).

As you may have guessed, I need to see a lot of improvement in Kreuzer if he's to be my preferred 1st ruck (ahead of both Warnock and Hampson). You see, Warnock has 6cm on him in height and another 10cm in reach...that's half a foot's advantage, and Hammer is only a couple of cms taller but can jump high when he's set himself up for the jump in the centre bounce. Which one do we trade????? They're all candidates. I guess it depends on how much one values ruckwork.

Before Jolly came to the Pies, they really valued what they needed, they just didn't really need 2 of them. Jolly comes along and bingo, they win a flag rucking against the Saints' ordinary ruck Kozi and hasbeen King. Now that Jolly is getting older, we showed the Pies what 2 young energetic ruckmen can do to an old man (admitedly Jolly didn't seem fit when we played the Pies this year). So, we need 1 and 1 reserve ruckman, not 3. Kreuzer seems to only do well rucking against an old man at the end of his career...so what does he do for us against all the other young spring heeled ruckmen in the comp?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:26 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Just play a normal ruckrover like Muprhy, Carrazzo, Simpson etc. They will be 10 times better than Kruezer at that job. If Kruezer cant make an impact as a ruckman or as a forward then there is no position for him in the 22. Sub maybe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 2:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
bondiblue wrote:
jimmae wrote:
With all due respect bondi, Kreuzer as ruck/rover is how to get sacked a month into the season. :lol:


I remember your posts back in 2006 or was it 2007 (or both) when you were raving about this kid called Kreuzer who was too young to be drafted in the 2007 draft, and that we should wait for him rather than go for a ruckman or KP (Hansen I think) ahead of Gibbs and others in 2007.

I followed that kid Kreuzer, and saw him at Northern and yep I knew you were onto something. He was amazing with a huge engine...a sort of onballer.

Fastforward post knee reco, and I feel the game has gone past Kreuzer as a ruckman, and he really doesn't excite me too much as a FF either, but he might be able to play a Cloke like CHF role except he has one glaring weakness: he doesn't take contested marks. Period!

There's another issue and that is he isn't tall enough to compete with much taller ruckmen because he doesn't have a leap to get up high enough. That's the way I see it...and he's had plenty of time to come good post knee.

Yes he's damn good once the ball hits the turf, if the ball is in his path, but I think he has to be down there ruck roving to see more of this strength working for us and him. Hence, maybe, just maybe he's a ruck rover. If not...then I don't know if MM sees the benefit of a 200cm ruckman who doesn't take contested marks (like Wood).

As you may have guessed, I need to see a lot of improvement in Kreuzer if he's to be my preferred 1st ruck (ahead of both Warnock and Hampson). You see, Warnock has 6cm on him in height and another 10cm in reach...that's half a foot's advantage, and Hammer is only a couple of cms taller but can jump high when he's set himself up for the jump in the centre bounce. Which one do we trade????? They're all candidates. I guess it depends on how much one values ruckwork.

Before Jolly came to the Pies, they really valued what they needed, they just didn't really need 2 of them. Jolly comes along and bingo, they win a flag rucking against the Saints' ordinary ruck Kozi and hasbeen King. Now that Jolly is getting older, we showed the Pies what 2 young energetic ruckmen can do to an old man (admitedly Jolly didn't seem fit when we played the Pies this year). So, we need 1 and 1 reserve ruckman, not 3. Kreuzer seems to only do well rucking against an old man at the end of his career...so what does he do for us against all the other young spring heeled ruckmen in the comp?

He'll get blown away playing as a midfielder bondi, but I agree with you in that he is more than just a ruckman, just like Cox is more than just a ruckman. The reach issue is a concern, but he's got more he can do to gain the explosive power in his legs to make his leap a useful tool at centre bounces.

Give him time, what he's managed to achieve so far is bloody brilliant for his age.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:23 pm
Posts: 2
I reckon MM will try and de-mystify Judd.
Like Barassi did with Flower and MM did with Buckley, he will try to make him more accountable and improve him as a player by giving him more defensive tasks, and possibly play him off wing or half back occasionally.
He will try and build up strong inside mids like he did with Lucuria at Pies.
He likes class finishes on outside like Matera, Mainwairing, Hawkins and Thomas, so Gibbs might play off the wing next season.

I reckon our squad is most like the Eagles circa 1990 of the teams MM took over coaching - talented, but flaky and prone to lapses and unable to consistently compete with teams above them.
If true to form we should have a harder edge next season and improve quickly. He had Footscray, WCE, and Pies in finals in 2nd, 1st, and 3rd years, and they all started further back then we are coming from.

Cannot see someone as physically scared of contact as Gartlett surviving under MM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:32 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Why can't we give MM 3 or 4 years to get us into a position to challenge (prelims)?
Why do we over rate the list?
List is no where near as good as West Coast 90' with young Jakovich, Matera, Woosha, Heady, Sumich, Mainwarring

NAME 5 Elite Kicks in our best 22?
The test is a player who can kick accurately, with distance and underpressure
I would regard Scotland as the only elite kick in our side. Gibbs is close but I am not sure he is a good kick under pressure.
Therefore if you haven't got 5 players with good disposal in the whole side, how are you ready to challenge for a premiership.

Then you get to game plan problems

Then you have to work on the lack of hardness and mental toughness

EMBRACE THE REALITY WE ARE MILES OFF.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:36 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
He'll want gut running bigger bodied players. The players each will have a role and if they cant fulfil it they're out and someone else will get a go. I also expect some list turnover in the next 2 years as he sorts a few players out.


I'll be very interested with what he will do with the list. Possibles:

Russell could very well be retained. Bigger stronger body type especially if he adds a few kilos.

Thornton as a back up ruckman key forward role whilst Casboult/Mitchell develop.

Could easily trade two ruckman.

Kicking and ball use. I expect will be a big decision in selection. Guys that can't hit targets will struggle.

Buckley to bulk up and be our Miss Daisy. Dale possible as well.

I could see him playing McCarthy straight up the way he did Reid. He will want 30-50 games into these kids as soon as he can. Bootsma, Mitchell, Casboult, OKeefe in the same boat.

I can see a midfield built around Bell, McLean, Robinson, Touhy, Gibbs and maybe Russell. I reckon he will want that size around the ball. That's where Warnock may come in. First use of the ball and structure around the stoppages will be a big focus. This releases Murphy, Judd, Simpson, Lucas, Yarran, Garlett to spread, run and carry.

Tempo control of games. Time to go flat out and time to hold and control. Something we just haven't done.

Improved workrate of Gibbs, Yarran & Lucas. If these guys can improve to levels expected it will make a massive difference to our results.

Judd a lot more up forward.

A settled back 6. MM will select a back 6 and try and let it settle. Running creative HB's with two talls and two taller third up options is his want. The way they work together as a group will be very important.

I will watch the next 6 weeks with interest then the draft.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:42 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Michael Jezz wrote:
NAME 5 Elite Kicks in our best 22?


With a structured game plan and knowing where to go automatically and who will be there I rate these as very good to elite kicks.

Yarran, Gibbs, OKeefe, Laidler, Watson, Touhy, Judd, Betts (in general play), McInnes, Bootsma, Scotland.

Watch what happens when these guys have a role and and know exactly what to do in each situation. Also looking up and seeing players move to the right position will make a massive difference.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Walker in the midfield....

where he can exploit his pace and his stamina....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 269 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 115 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group