keogh wrote:
A loaded question Cazz.
I teach in a low social economic area that has been !@#$%& up by shocking administration.
With VELS basically a kid has to be 2 years ahead of his or her year level to get an A
So your answer is 0.
I reckon I am a good teacher because the majority of the kids I teach are getting better. I guess that is how a teacher gauges how successful he or she is.
Yes. I know what your getting at.
I dont deny all clubs !@#$%& up with recruiting .
Its just the quick fix solution the club seems to have with the 3 trades I have look at.
Its an opinion. Yep you work in the area I am being critical. You do know more than me.
Feel free to criticise the fact that none of my students dont get A. Your have the right to an opinion.
Bottom line Cazz an AFL club is judged on the win loss ratio, development as a team and ultimately a flag.
Yes you got me, it was an extremely loaded question. They are easy to post aren't they. And yet you were inclined to offer reasons and explanations within your answers to justify whatever results you do or don't get. You think you are a good teacher. Would others say the same if they dissected your efforts vs results with a fine tooth comb 3/5 years later?
I think WH and SR are very good at their job when all things are considered.
Like all recruiters they have their hits and misses. Teachers have their own hits and misses I'm sure.
The hardest thing about recruiting is the fact you are dealing with 17/18yr olds. Kids who are coming into a situation that is so pressurised it is not surprising some don't/can't make it. They might give all the best answers when interviewed and they pass all the tests (both physical and mental) thrown at them, but no-one can really predict how the kids will react and mature in the environment of an AFL club. In the NFL in the US they pick mature men at 22 to play that sport and they still get it wrong. The NFL recruiters can't believe the AFL goes at 17/18.
Every clubs recruiters would like to bat at 100%. No-one has a 70% success rate let alone 100%.
I'm not trying to justify why any player has been picked. That's all been done to death.
I just wanted to point out that it is not an exact science. Just like Teaching, nomatter how good you might be at your job.
I certainly know the bottom line is all about the 'W' and the 'L'. The review will include the entire football department so I guess the reviewer will decide who has and hasn't got it right, based on all the facts and not just the W/L ratio.
Regards Cazzesman