Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 7:15 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Not enough premierships and cake-walks in our song.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25230
Location: Bondi Beach
london blue wrote:
lets stick to the topic of the thread ie what is behind players wanting to leave

sure we could have made better decisions, but the past is the past.

as we move forward, the bar has to be raised. if grigg, thornton, walker want to pursue options elsewhere they don't want in.

If the reports are true ie pursuing an interest in the bulldogs, tigers or adelaide then there aspirations are not necessarily motivated by premierships. we have as much chance as the three clubs mentioned.

they clearly dont buy into what we ARE building.....who cares....lets get talent that does and talent that will contribute


POW

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:23 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
gerry atric wrote:
I've never had rose coloured glasses and I think a few supporters need to throw theirs away. From 2004 when we were back in the draft and the worst side in the League with plenty of high draft picks to prove it we needed to do everything right to get to the top. We needed to draft better than everyone else - we've done okay but apart from te top picks and Simmo- not too many diamonds in the rough, certainly less than some clubs and no more than most. Certainly Collingwood who are the best have drafted better than us with lesser picks than us. We tried desperately to appoint Michael Voss, who has led the Lions to oblivion, and then appointed an inexperienced mate who happened to be at the club at the time. Is Ratts the best coach in the league, the second best, the fifth best, tenth best? He ain't the best and that's what we needed. Currently he has no assistants. Is that because the best people were picked to support him? Is Sticks the best Pres in the league? Joking. The one wonderful we have done is recruited Judd. Without him we wouldn't have finished higher than tenth.

And really the old chesnut about retrospective drafting whenever anyone questions the clubs decisions, is pretty lame. Yes drafting is easy in retrospect, but we didn't need to be perfect, we needed to be better than evryone else, or than almost everyone else. Have we been? We have got good players with the number one picks - big deal, of course we will. What about picks outside the first round?
We are destined for a long drought and a grim future unless we improve in all areas. What strategies do we have to build our support to C'wood levels?

We have had our big go at the draft and it will determine our capacity to win a flag while we have Judd. I feel very pessimistic.


Why do you want other posters to be pessimistic and have such a sour opinion of the club?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:36 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
club29 wrote:
Why do you want other posters to be pessimistic and have such a sour opinion of the club?


I reckon there's a lot of blind faith out there when we need to improve massively in all areas, and will only do that by being clear eyed about where we are. If you think we have done better than other clubs at drafting, development, coaching over the last 5 years and are therefore primed for a successful era, that's great. I just can't see it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:41 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:41 pm
Posts: 2385
bondiblue wrote:
london blue wrote:
lets stick to the topic of the thread ie what is behind players wanting to leave

sure we could have made better decisions, but the past is the past.

as we move forward, the bar has to be raised. if grigg, thornton, walker want to pursue options elsewhere they don't want in.

If the reports are true ie pursuing an interest in the bulldogs, tigers or adelaide then there aspirations are not necessarily motivated by premierships. we have as much chance as the three clubs mentioned.

they clearly dont buy into what we ARE building.....who cares....lets get talent that does and talent that will contribute


POW

Not sure this is worthy of POW.

Seems like a bit of rhetoric from my perspective.

"lets get talent that does and talent that will contribute" sounds similar to "Let's move Australia forward". Seems to say a lot but says little.

How will this be achieved?

Provide the answers and you will have your POW


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
gerry atric wrote:
club29 wrote:
Why do you want other posters to be pessimistic and have such a sour opinion of the club?


I reckon there's a lot of blind faith out there when we need to improve massively in all areas, and will only do that by being clear eyed about where we are. If you think we have done better than other clubs at drafting, development, coaching over the last 5 years and are therefore primed for a successful era, that's great. I just can't see it.


Get some decent specs gerry atric!

:cool:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 11:09 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
gerry atric wrote:
club29 wrote:
Why do you want other posters to be pessimistic and have such a sour opinion of the club?


I reckon there's a lot of blind faith out there when we need to improve massively in all areas, and will only do that by being clear eyed about where we are. If you think we have done better than other clubs at drafting, development, coaching over the last 5 years and are therefore primed for a successful era, that's great. I just can't see it.


Pessimistic or realistic?

Gerry makes a lot of sense. Maybe he is going over the top but nothing wrong with that if it means getting his point across.

And his point is that we should be the best in the league not also rans.

From the boot studders to the president. And we are not.

I have said in other threads that appointing the right assistant coaches is the immediate imperative. Let's see what happens there. If we don't go out and get the best, not the best available, then we will not be the best.

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 12:52 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
club29 wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
I've never had rose coloured glasses and I think a few supporters need to throw theirs away. From 2004 when we were back in the draft and the worst side in the League with plenty of high draft picks to prove it we needed to do everything right to get to the top. We needed to draft better than everyone else - we've done okay but apart from te top picks and Simmo- not too many diamonds in the rough, certainly less than some clubs and no more than most. Certainly Collingwood who are the best have drafted better than us with lesser picks than us. We tried desperately to appoint Michael Voss, who has led the Lions to oblivion, and then appointed an inexperienced mate who happened to be at the club at the time. Is Ratts the best coach in the league, the second best, the fifth best, tenth best? He ain't the best and that's what we needed. Currently he has no assistants. Is that because the best people were picked to support him? Is Sticks the best Pres in the league? Joking. The one wonderful we have done is recruited Judd. Without him we wouldn't have finished higher than tenth.

And really the old chesnut about retrospective drafting whenever anyone questions the clubs decisions, is pretty lame. Yes drafting is easy in retrospect, but we didn't need to be perfect, we needed to be better than evryone else, or than almost everyone else. Have we been? We have got good players with the number one picks - big deal, of course we will. What about picks outside the first round?
We are destined for a long drought and a grim future unless we improve in all areas. What strategies do we have to build our support to C'wood levels?

We have had our big go at the draft and it will determine our capacity to win a flag while we have Judd. I feel very pessimistic.


Why do you want other posters to be pessimistic and have such a sour opinion of the club?

That's how he enjoys following Carlton.

If the balls bounced up to Milne and he kicks it, are Collingwood still the best drafters, traders and developers of talent in the AFL?

Even the best in the business admitted they let the Saints nearly get it last week.

I wasn't aware that we were out of the draft altogether.

How would Carlton survive without Fevola everyone cried?

Why didn't we pick Talia?

Well we didn't go backwards after passing on these two players.

Two players we recruited outside the first round are being chased by other clubs, so I guess we need to sack our recruiters. :wink: :roll:

Honestly, you'd think we were Brisbane who have lost Bradshaw, Rischitelli, Henderson, Brennan, Sherman and Clark in the last 12 months.

Coaching needs to improve, but our list isn't poor like gerryatric believes.

Chicken littles are just pissed at Collingwood winning.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:45 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:04 pm
Posts: 976
1997

Kris Massie
Adam Chatfield

1998

Marray Vance

2000

Trent Sporn
Simon Wiggins
Blake Campbell

2003

Andrew Walker

2004

Adam Hartlett

2006

Hampson
Grigg

This is an amazing hit/miss ratio so far.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:58 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 5:03 pm
Posts: 573
Location: Camberwell
blue4 wrote:
1997

Kris Massie
Adam Chatfield

1998

Marray Vance

2000

Trent Sporn
Simon Wiggins
Blake Campbell

2003

Andrew Walker

2004

Adam Hartlett

2006

Hampson
Grigg

This is an amazing hit/miss ratio so far.


What about the years you skipped? or the gems we did find like Garlett and Armfield

_________________
Carlton Premiers '10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 2:20 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
They don't suit his argument. Ergo, they never happened.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:33 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Whats wrong with Hammer?

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 7:08 am 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 424
dane wrote:
Whats wrong with Hammer?


He doesn't have the basic level of co-ordination required to play football!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:23 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:49 pm
Posts: 46
dane wrote:
Whats wrong with Hammer?


id feel so much better if it was him leaving and not jacobs.he just does not have natural ability thats why he will never learn to mark you either have it or you dont.just because you are an athlete doesnt mean you automatically become skilful and please dont use kouta as an example this business about him being an athlete who learned to play is crap i saw him play juniors and u19s and he was head and shoulders above the rest just raw. hampson is no where near the same level


Last edited by TruBlueBrad on Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
quotes fixed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:32 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
I live within a Collingwood family - yep life's tough but anyway the point

Lasy year they were gabbing on about

Dawes - no good can't mark, too slow

Macaffer - They'd just laugh

Thomas - show pony at best

Toovey - hopeless

Gqldsack - trade bait

L Brown - another example of Collingwood drafting for hacks.


funny now all those blokes are premiership players

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:54 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4943
I think our drafting from 2004 to present has been pretty good - sure not perfect but whose is? Remember Collingwood used their first pick in 2007 on Cameron Wood.

Excluding the "obvious" early picks below are the highlights of our drafting in this period:

2004
- first pick (#9) on Russell was best possible selection out of several options
- "diamond in rough" Eddie Betts
2005
- pick #20 on Bower a very good selection. Bernie Vince the only better player taken afterwards.
2006
- pick #17 on Hampson good selection
- ditto pick #19 on Grigg. Very disappointed he wants out.
After these 2 players, Tippett at pick #32 was only the better option.
2007
- pick #46 on Armfield good value.
- "diamond in the rough" Jamison
2008
- Glad we took Yarran over the "safer" option of Rich.
- Warnock trade for pick #24 great value
- "diamond in the rough" Garlett
2009
- Magnificent trade to get Henderson and pick #12 for Fev.
- Pick #12 for Lucas a gem.
- Marcus Davies looks a likely type for pick #43

Sure the McLean trade doesn't look good so far but remember he is still only 24yo and hopefully will be over his injuries next year. Too early to call this trade.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:25 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
BlueLife wrote:
dane wrote:
Whats wrong with Hammer?


He doesn't have the basic level of co-ordination required to play football!


I just dont see that Bluelife. For a ruck and very tall forward i have seen him show some dash, take marks, lay some very big tackles and hit some nice hitouts. He also gets to a lot more marking contests than our other ruckman.

Maybe a bit unco looking in the contested marks but i am betting it will come. Krooz and Warnoch have him covered in this dept.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:22 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Humpers wrote:
I think our drafting from 2004 to present has been pretty good - sure not perfect but whose is? Remember Collingwood used their first pick in 2007 on Cameron Wood.

Excluding the "obvious" early picks below are the highlights of our drafting in this period:

2004
- first pick (#9) on Russell was best possible selection out of several options
- "diamond in rough" Eddie Betts
2005
- pick #20 on Bower a very good selection. Bernie Vince the only better player taken afterwards.
2006
- pick #17 on Hampson good selection
- ditto pick #19 on Grigg. Very disappointed he wants out.
After these 2 players, Tippett at pick #32 was only the better option.
2007
- pick #46 on Armfield good value.
- "diamond in the rough" Jamison
2008
- Glad we took Yarran over the "safer" option of Rich.
- Warnock trade for pick #24 great value
- "diamond in the rough" Garlett
2009
- Magnificent trade to get Henderson and pick #12 for Fev.
- Pick #12 for Lucas a gem.
- Marcus Davies looks a likely type for pick #43

Sure the McLean trade doesn't look good so far but remember he is still only 24yo and hopefully will be over his injuries next year. Too early to call this trade.


McLean is our Wood.

In the above list have we done better than every other team, or most other teams, because if you are starting at the bottom, that' s what you need to do.

Time will tell, but you'd love a draft where we got more than two players. We have done well in the rookie draft, as have most clubs. How many rookies did the Pies have out there yesterday. It's the picks outside the first round of the national draft that we have failed to capitalise on.

Also it is not to do with the bounce of the ball in the first gf. The saints are a fair way ahead of us, mainly due to an excellent authorative coach.

Anyway, if everyone else thinks there are blue skies ahead, that's great. I can't see it. Maybe in 2012 we can get a quality experienced coach, with quality assistants in an environment that players don't want to leave, where the team and not the individual are paramount, and get the very best out of our list. At the moment we look rudderless.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:07 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
gerry atric wrote:

McLean is our Wood.

In the above list have we done better than every other team, or most other teams, because if you are starting at the bottom, that' s what you need to do.

Time will tell, but you'd love a draft where we got more than two players. We have done well in the rookie draft, as have most clubs. How many rookies did the Pies have out there yesterday. It's the picks outside the first round of the national draft that we have failed to capitalise on.

Also it is not to do with the bounce of the ball in the first gf. The saints are a fair way ahead of us, mainly due to an excellent authorative coach.

Anyway, if everyone else thinks there are blue skies ahead, that's great. I can't see it. Maybe in 2012 we can get a quality experienced coach, with quality assistants in an environment that players don't want to leave, where the team and not the individual are paramount, and get the very best out of our list. At the moment we look rudderless.
Spot on Gerry.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 11:34 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
gerry atric wrote:

McLean is our Wood.

In the above list have we done better than every other team, or most other teams, because if you are starting at the bottom, that' s what you need to do.

Time will tell, but you'd love a draft where we got more than two players. We have done well in the rookie draft, as have most clubs. How many rookies did the Pies have out there yesterday. It's the picks outside the first round of the national draft that we have failed to capitalise on.

Also it is not to do with the bounce of the ball in the first gf. The saints are a fair way ahead of us, mainly due to an excellent authorative coach.

Anyway, if everyone else thinks there are blue skies ahead, that's great. I can't see it. Maybe in 2012 we can get a quality experienced coach, with quality assistants in an environment that players don't want to leave, where the team and not the individual are paramount, and get the very best out of our list. At the moment we look rudderless.
Spot on Gerry.


Plenty of Gerry Atric type posters on the Collingwood boards as recent as round 2 this year. Plenty wanted Malthouse replaced by Buckley immediately.

I am happy for the blues to see out the plan they put in place with Pratt back in 2007. So far as far as i can tell everything is on track. Even the unexpected departure of stevens and Fev have done little to take us off the path. In fact through some smart trading , draft picks and coaching we have barely noticed them gone. Phasing out Thornton and a couple of others has also been a plus while building our ruck stocks and in doing so our playing assets looks to have worked a treat with a rookie now looking like fetching a first round pick.
Over paying for Mclean was a mistake. The club obviously thought any pick after 10 in the draft was a raffle and took a punt. Hopefully we can still get some value out of Mclean. His injuries are a worry.
I am sure Ratts knows and accepts that top 4 has to be achieved in 11'. If he fails then he knows we have gone off the path and will struggle to get another contract.

I dont see the doom and gloom.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Heavs, rodrocketman and 58 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group