bondiblue wrote:
I've just finished watching the replay and his harshest critic would say he cost us one goal when he gave away a free for in the back to Jetta in the third. The ball then went through another 2 sets of hands before Melbourne kicked a goal. I'd argue that he was in the air before he realised the ball was going to go over the heads anyway.
Anderson is no star yet, and he may never get the chance to do it at Carlton given the depth we have, but I liked the Anderson I saw yesterday the way he wanted to attack the lines and use his pace. He wasn't one of our best, but he showed good signs yesterday imo.
Good to see someone standing up for Joey. I think he has been a solid contributor for the last 3 games. Unfortunately has has made mistakes that stand out. The free for in the back this week was a pretty poor mistake, but many so called supporters tehd to forget the ten times per game when he does something good for the team and only remember the mistake. Did we all castigate Judd when he kicked poorly accross goal two weeks in a row (both times costing us a goal) Did we all rubbish J Waite for jumping in an apponents back costing us a free?
Joey may not quite be in our best 22 when all players are fit, but if he has a few more periods like his first half against Melbourne, he will be pushing for a regular spot.
How about, instead of rubbishing our own, we celebrate the fact that we are soon going to be in a position where 6 or 8 players that miss out on our best 22 are very close and that we will be able to continue to cover injured players by players of similar ability and application.
How true is the quote of one commentator (ex Blue Player, captain, coach) who said something like "it is not how good are the best six players that make a top team but how good are the last six".
Pro's - we won without playing anywhere near our best.
Con's - I tossed up between Houla (at 20/1 and Simmo at 41/1) for first goal and put $20 on Houla.