Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 8:10 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:09 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
Siegfried wrote:
Agree with Walker as the third mobile tall down back. I knew I'd forgotten someone there!

Your backline is just about spot on, although there will be plenty of times where Gibbs plays midfield, and Joseph or Lucas go back.


How is he a tall at 189-190cms, when you playing on talls 195+

It may only be 2-3cms difference, but the girls do say size counts :)

Thornton 192
Bower 192
Jamo 193

Playing against the likes of Kennedy 196cms and Gumbleton 197cms, that is quite a bit of difference in height and wing span for spoiling. Walker played on Gumbleton and l didn't think he did a good job. Gumbleton kicked a couple goals on him and couldn't spoil gumbleton.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 7:04 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
190cm for a third tall is fine, especiallly when you look at the third tall forwards that are playing these days. How many team's third tall forward is above 194cm? (with the exception of resting rucks, and that's a different story).

I once had a discussion with my accountant, who's a big Carlton man, about our key backs. I did some research, the majority of the top key position backs in the last 10 years were between 190 and 194 (from memory, Mal Michael was 190, Leppitch not much taller). Fletcher is an obvious exception.

the gist of my argument though is that most clubs are now playing 2 talls forward, and then mids and small. therefore Walker works well as someone who can play tall if needed (not an a Brown, on a third tall. Jamison and Bower take Brown and Fevola, Riewoldt and Koschitske, Podsiadly and Mooney etc. Remember, he was killing Hawkins when he hurt his shoulder).

A backline of Jamison and Bower, with Walker, Russell, Armfield and Gibbs/Joseph/Lucas etc I think has the perfect balance of height, mobility and run. Comparing it's function this year to the last 2 years supports that.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 7:21 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 5:03 pm
Posts: 573
Location: Camberwell
Yes.

In referance to the threads topic.

_________________
Carlton Premiers '10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 7:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
Siegfried wrote:
190cm for a third tall is fine, especiallly when you look at the third tall forwards that are playing these days. How many team's third tall forward is above 194cm? (with the exception of resting rucks, and that's a different story).

I once had a discussion with my accountant, who's a big Carlton man, about our key backs. I did some research, the majority of the top key position backs in the last 10 years were between 190 and 194 (from memory, Mal Michael was 190, Leppitch not much taller). Fletcher is an obvious exception.

the gist of my argument though is that most clubs are now playing 2 talls forward, and then mids and small. therefore Walker works well as someone who can play tall if needed (not an a Brown, on a third tall. Jamison and Bower take Brown and Fevola, Riewoldt and Koschitske, Podsiadly and Mooney etc. Remember, he was killing Hawkins when he hurt his shoulder).

A backline of Jamison and Bower, with Walker, Russell, Armfield and Gibbs/Joseph/Lucas etc I think has the perfect balance of height, mobility and run. Comparing it's function this year to the last 2 years supports that.


I totally agree with this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Goltzenberg wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
Agree with Walker as the third mobile tall down back. I knew I'd forgotten someone there!

Your backline is just about spot on, although there will be plenty of times where Gibbs plays midfield, and Joseph or Lucas go back.


How is he a tall at 189-190cms, when you playing on talls 195+

It may only be 2-3cms difference, but the girls do say size counts :)

Thornton 192
Bower 192
Jamo 193

Playing against the likes of Kennedy 196cms and Gumbleton 197cms, that is quite a bit of difference in height and wing span for spoiling. Walker played on Gumbleton and l didn't think he did a good job. Gumbleton kicked a couple goals on him and couldn't spoil gumbleton.


Gumbleton had 10 disposals, 6 marks and kicked 1 goal
Hawkins had 8 handballs, obviously no goals

Both 197cm and Walker has done a superb job on them.

Look, the worry about talls is a myth really. I still remember David Teague being crucified for being matched up on Greg Stafford one day. Stafford had all of about 6 touches. I don't think we get exploited by them nearly as much as is being made out.

Jonothan Brown is the only one thats really carved us up, maybe you'd say Buddy as well. Bower would have been first choice against both and didn't play.

You can count on one hand the number of forwards over 196cm who have had sustained long term success. To recruit players specifically to counter them would be a waste.

Lets say we recruited a 197cm defender and were playing Adelaide in a couple of weeks when Bower is back in the team. Do we drop one of Jammo or Bower so our 197cm defender can play on Tippett or go in with 3 talls and Walker and throw the balance of our team out?

Best thing you can do is exploit them going the other way. Walker had 19 disposals against Essendon* and 18 disposals in 2.5 quarters against Geelong.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:59 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
So far this season we have exploited opposition tall forwards lack of run more than they have exploited our size. If or when that swings the other way I will agree we need to change our balance and try and bring in a taller defender.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:26 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:31 pm
Posts: 38
Location: Melbourne
Yes!
So happy Waite and Hoops are back this week.
And thank god they left Hadley and Browne in, those boys provide us with some steel!
Bring on the Dees! :grin:

_________________
I absolutely love Carlton Football Club.


Rambo Robinson #12


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:27 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
Realistically, when they're on song, what defender can match buddy's combination of speed, height and skill? Roo's endurance? Brown's ability to impose his will on a match.

These guys are hard to match up on for a reason.

When we start getting beaten up by Hale or Cloke I'll start asking questions.

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Lets say we recruited a 197cm defender and were playing Adelaide in a couple of weeks when Bower is back in the team. Do we drop one of Jammo or Bower so our 197cm defender can play on Tippett or go in with 3 talls and Walker and throw the balance of our team out?

Best thing you can do is exploit them going the other way. Walker had 19 disposals against Essendon* and 18 disposals in 2.5 quarters against Geelong.

You'd push Walker or Russell into midfield and have Bower man a medium player, in this case, Burton.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
jimmae wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Lets say we recruited a 197cm defender and were playing Adelaide in a couple of weeks when Bower is back in the team. Do we drop one of Jammo or Bower so our 197cm defender can play on Tippett or go in with 3 talls and Walker and throw the balance of our team out?

Best thing you can do is exploit them going the other way. Walker had 19 disposals against Essendon* and 18 disposals in 2.5 quarters against Geelong.

You'd push Walker or Russell into midfield and have Bower man a medium player, in this case, Burton.


I would too.

Thank goodness for inaccurate kicking against us, because if he kicked straight, Tippet would've kicked 9 against us last year and should've kicked 5 this year. I wonder why he gets so many opportunities when he has a hard tag from Jamo. He's not beating Jamo on the lead.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:19 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
bondiblue wrote:
jimmae wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Lets say we recruited a 197cm defender and were playing Adelaide in a couple of weeks when Bower is back in the team. Do we drop one of Jammo or Bower so our 197cm defender can play on Tippett or go in with 3 talls and Walker and throw the balance of our team out?

Best thing you can do is exploit them going the other way. Walker had 19 disposals against Essendon* and 18 disposals in 2.5 quarters against Geelong.

You'd push Walker or Russell into midfield and have Bower man a medium player, in this case, Burton.


I would too.

Thank goodness for inaccurate kicking against us, because if he kicked straight, Tippet would've kicked 9 against us last year and should've kicked 5 this year. I wonder why he gets so many opportunities when he has a hard tag from Jamo. He's not beating Jamo on the lead.


Tippett took two marks this year Bondi?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:31 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
bondiblue wrote:
jimmae wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Lets say we recruited a 197cm defender and were playing Adelaide in a couple of weeks when Bower is back in the team. Do we drop one of Jammo or Bower so our 197cm defender can play on Tippett or go in with 3 talls and Walker and throw the balance of our team out?

Best thing you can do is exploit them going the other way. Walker had 19 disposals against Essendon* and 18 disposals in 2.5 quarters against Geelong.

You'd push Walker or Russell into midfield and have Bower man a medium player, in this case, Burton.


I would too.

Thank goodness for inaccurate kicking against us, because if he kicked straight, Tippet would've kicked 9 against us last year and should've kicked 5 this year. I wonder why he gets so many opportunities when he has a hard tag from Jamo. He's not beating Jamo on the lead.


Actually on reflection when should Tippett have kicked 9 goals against us last year playing on Jammo? Jammo was injured for the second game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:17 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
jimmae wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Lets say we recruited a 197cm defender and were playing Adelaide in a couple of weeks when Bower is back in the team. Do we drop one of Jammo or Bower so our 197cm defender can play on Tippett or go in with 3 talls and Walker and throw the balance of our team out?

Best thing you can do is exploit them going the other way. Walker had 19 disposals against Essendon* and 18 disposals in 2.5 quarters against Geelong.

You'd push Walker or Russell into midfield and have Bower man a medium player, in this case, Burton.


It actually surprises me that you'd alter our structure like that.

I hadn't checked the stats before I asked that question, but as Belisarius pointed out, Tippett only had 5 kicks and kicked 2 behinds against us this year. Now you may argue thats because we dominated the game further up field and so Tippett was starved of opportunity, but thats really the point, it has a lot to do with pressure in the forward 50 and through the midfield.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 8:12 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
TruBlueBrad wrote:
jimmae wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Lets say we recruited a 197cm defender and were playing Adelaide in a couple of weeks when Bower is back in the team. Do we drop one of Jammo or Bower so our 197cm defender can play on Tippett or go in with 3 talls and Walker and throw the balance of our team out?

Best thing you can do is exploit them going the other way. Walker had 19 disposals against Essendon* and 18 disposals in 2.5 quarters against Geelong.

You'd push Walker or Russell into midfield and have Bower man a medium player, in this case, Burton.


It actually surprises me that you'd alter our structure like that.

I hadn't checked the stats before I asked that question, but as Belisarius pointed out, Tippett only had 5 kicks and kicked 2 behinds against us this year. Now you may argue thats because we dominated the game further up field and so Tippett was starved of opportunity, but thats really the point, it has a lot to do with pressure in the forward 50 and through the midfield.


He does play a bit in the Ruck as well TBB which sort of helps their case, but he really only had any impact on the game in the last and I certainly don't think he dominated at any stage. When matched up on him Jammo had him well under control for the great majority of the time :thumbsup: I probably wouldn't give them the slight out that he was starved of opportunity TBB, they actually had five more forward fifty entries 41 to 36. I just think that Jammo is a better allround defender than they think (especially Bondi :smile:) and is improving.

The first game last season Tippett kicked two goals but only took two marks in a game where they smashed us, his stats were very similar to the game this year, except he converted. It was their smalls and mediums who killed us that day and our own coaches box :oops: It can't be denied that Tippett flogged us second game last season, but Jammo didn't play and they were white hot, coupled with our team defensive efforts being awful. Which I think highlights your point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
jimmae wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Lets say we recruited a 197cm defender and were playing Adelaide in a couple of weeks when Bower is back in the team. Do we drop one of Jammo or Bower so our 197cm defender can play on Tippett or go in with 3 talls and Walker and throw the balance of our team out?

Best thing you can do is exploit them going the other way. Walker had 19 disposals against Essendon* and 18 disposals in 2.5 quarters against Geelong.

You'd push Walker or Russell into midfield and have Bower man a medium player, in this case, Burton.


I would never of picked you for that tactic Jimmae. To me that sounds like a step backwards. Using Walker to expose a tall forward is a weapon for us. So much so i think soon coaches will realise what we are doing and stop playing a third or even a second tall forward.

At worst i reckon playing a shorter mobile backline will cost us on average 3 goals a game but i could bet that the drive we get and the tone that is set by playing a shorter mobile backline sets us up for a lot more goals. I am sure Ratts has the stats to back this.

I wouldnt change the setup but agree it would be handy if Jamo was 3cm taller and Bower 3kg heavier.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:51 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
Belisarius wrote:

He does play a bit in the Ruck as well TBB which sort of helps their case, but he really only had any impact on the game in the last and I certainly don't think he dominated at any stage. When matched up on him Jammo had him well under control for the great majority of the time :thumbsup: I probably wouldn't give them the slight out that he was starved of opportunity TBB, they actually had five more forward fifty entries 41 to 36. I just think that Jammo is a better allround defender than they think (especially Bondi :smile:) and is improving.

The first game last season Tippett kicked two goals but only took two marks in a game where they smashed us, his stats were very similar to the game this year, except he converted. It was their smalls and mediums who killed us that day and our own coaches box :oops: It can't be denied that Tippett flogged us second game last season, but Jammo didn't play and they were white hot, coupled with our team defensive efforts being awful. Which I think highlights your point.


I am not saying Jamo is not a good defender. He is a fantastic defender with good closing speed.
In fact we look our of whack when he's missing. He stiffens up our spine. He's highly valued. I love him, and he's only human.

I am pointing out a gap in our defense, against height. That's all.

The fact that Tippet did kick a bag, whether it was Jamo or Bower or whoever, it was Tippett's height which exposed us. True?

I've seen Jamo outmarked by taller opponents. Haven't you?
I've seen Jamo give away plenty of cheap frees away when he was likely to be outmarked. Haven't you?
I've seen our defense look small when taller forwards have taken their spot at FF. Haven't you?

Lets just focus on the discussion of height as perhaps one of our few weaknesses, instead of the man.
The said weakness is something all teams suffer from at some stage, and it's not a Jamo-Bower issue; it's a footy issue.

If we have no achilles heal/ weaknesses then we are perfect. If that's your premise fine.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 12:26 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
bondiblue wrote:
Belisarius wrote:

He does play a bit in the Ruck as well TBB which sort of helps their case, but he really only had any impact on the game in the last and I certainly don't think he dominated at any stage. When matched up on him Jammo had him well under control for the great majority of the time :thumbsup: I probably wouldn't give them the slight out that he was starved of opportunity TBB, they actually had five more forward fifty entries 41 to 36. I just think that Jammo is a better allround defender than they think (especially Bondi :smile:) and is improving.

The first game last season Tippett kicked two goals but only took two marks in a game where they smashed us, his stats were very similar to the game this year, except he converted. It was their smalls and mediums who killed us that day and our own coaches box :oops: It can't be denied that Tippett flogged us second game last season, but Jammo didn't play and they were white hot, coupled with our team defensive efforts being awful. Which I think highlights your point.


I am not saying Jamo is not a good defender. He is a fantastic defender with good closing speed.
In fact we look our of whack when he's missing. He stiffens up our spine. He's highly valued. I love him, and he's only human.

I am pointing out a gap in our defense, against height. That's all.

The fact that Tippet did kick a bag, whether it was Jamo or Bower or whoever, it was Tippett's height which exposed us. True?

I've seen Jamo outmarked by taller opponents. Haven't you?
I've seen Jamo give away plenty of cheap frees away when he was likely to be outmarked. Haven't you?
I've seen our defense look small when taller forwards have taken their spot at FF. Haven't you?

Lets just focus on the discussion of height as perhaps one of our few weaknesses, instead of the man.
The said weakness is something all teams suffer from at some stage, and it's not a Jamo-Bower issue; it's a footy issue.

If we have no achilles heal/ weaknesses then we are perfect. If that's your premise fine.


I just deleted a post that totally misunderstood one of your comments. So you need to whack me over the head for being a dill :oops: :lol:

At this stage I think it is now down to we will just have to agree to disagree :smile: :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 5:51 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
Played the kind of game today that you need across half forward, that I don't think anyone else at the Club is currently able to play on a consistent basis. We look so much better with him there.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 6:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
club29 wrote:
jimmae wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Lets say we recruited a 197cm defender and were playing Adelaide in a couple of weeks when Bower is back in the team. Do we drop one of Jammo or Bower so our 197cm defender can play on Tippett or go in with 3 talls and Walker and throw the balance of our team out?

Best thing you can do is exploit them going the other way. Walker had 19 disposals against Essendon* and 18 disposals in 2.5 quarters against Geelong.

You'd push Walker or Russell into midfield and have Bower man a medium player, in this case, Burton.


I would never of picked you for that tactic Jimmae. To me that sounds like a step backwards. Using Walker to expose a tall forward is a weapon for us. So much so i think soon coaches will realise what we are doing and stop playing a third or even a second tall forward.

At worst i reckon playing a shorter mobile backline will cost us on average 3 goals a game but i could bet that the drive we get and the tone that is set by playing a shorter mobile backline sets us up for a lot more goals. I am sure Ratts has the stats to back this.

I wouldnt change the setup but agree it would be handy if Jamo was 3cm taller and Bower 3kg heavier.

I'd only change it for certain match-ups.

If there was a 195+ cm forward target we had to deal who is in good form, I would bring in a specialist defender. I've watched games where resting ruckmen, Brown, Westhoff, etc have made us look silly simply because we haven't been able to control the midfield and the rest of our personnel are too small.

There's no harm in giving a serious look to a taller defender if there's one in the draft pool.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16962
Location: Melbourne
Bower is certainly the missing link for us. He is 193cm with long arms and is getting stronger by the month.

Occasionally we might get outmarked down back by a really tall forward but with guys like Brown it is more his physical size and strength that is hard to move off the ball.

Reiwoldt just runs his opponents ragged plus he has the great spring at the marking contest. Hard to beat that all game.

I'll back Bower to break even with all the best forwards in the Comp. He is very rarely beaten badly.

Once Bower is back in with Jamo and our brand new Andrew Walker running rampant I am supremely confident we can cover most forwardlines. Add JR, Army and the mix of Scotto, Gibbo, AJ and/or Lucas and I think we have a fair back 6. Lucas is 188cm and can play taller with his spring. He just needs some more size. I like the idea of ulternating Scotto, Lucas, Gibbs and Walker up on wing to give some run towards F50. Waite up forward means that Setanta might get the 2nd best defender which is always a good thing.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google Adsense [Bot] and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group