kezza wrote:
The AFL has issued Carlton with a please explain. Is this the same AFL that at an official AFL meeting (ie the Brownlow) fuelled everyone with free alcohol and then when all goes pear shaped claim no responsibilty? The same official AFL meeting (Brownlow) that shows players skulling drinks when one of them on the table gets votes and is shown on TV for all to see?
Adrian Anderson is nothing but a useless puppet and wants to be seen doing something so has asked for a please explain. Did Adelaide have to explain why Bock was only suspended for one week after assaulting has girlfriend? Probably not.
I dont condone what the players did on the cruise, and i hope they are made to sit through a session on binge drinking just to see what dangers there can be. What if this had been a players 21st Birthday during the off season and it got a bit boozy and out of control? There is a fine line between it being none of the AFL's business and players private time.
Players dont have private time.The sooner they realise this the better it is for them
Theyre not paid big money to do as they please.
Im glad the AFL is stepping in.
As a matter of fact the time has come for the AFL to set up a tribunal for player conduct away from footy.
I dont believe the clubs are strong enough to dish out appropriate sanctions on their own accord.
If Fev had been whacked around the head with AFL sanctioned suspensions he would still be at the club.
Fines just dont cut it.
You hurt footballers by suspensions and then compound suspensions.
Its for their own good.