Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 5:57 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 125 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:11 am
Posts: 7
Bookie wrote:
Fishguts I don't think even Hurley or the Essendon* spin machine deny Hurley getting pissed and robbing and bashing a taxi driver :grin: Fair step up from drinking games getting out of control on a Xmas party cruise and Fevola's drunken lude comments at the Brownlow.
No doubt the AFL will turn the other cheek like when the Bombers got done for salary cap cheating and load up on Carlton :wink:
How is the Tigers Cap investigation going? hmm I guess it's not :roll:


I'll deny the robbing part, but the rest I won't deny on what's been reported. He'll have his day in court, and in all likeliness will get a slap on the wrist. All you can do is hope he learns from it and the Gold Coast keep his hands off him ;) As for the rest of your points, well, that's just going to start an arguement no one will win, bar the Richmond point. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:36 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
club29 wrote:
A lot of people are saying ban drinking and all that sort of stuff but there would have to be laws against such things you would think. Work cant take over lives that much. Next they will be getting them to play footy on good friday. Of course there is nothing stopping the coach from favouring those who want to get the best out of themselves.

Encouraging a healthy well balanced life would be the way to go. These are young men that should be able to make there own decisions with their lives. The blues need to make sure they know that what they choose to do affects the club and if its in a negative way they will be out.

Synbad, Find me a suitable person who wants the President gig and i will be right there with you calling for a switch. I am sure Kernahan would be also. Until then the Pres, Board, CEO, Coach and players have my full support and i look forward to them as a unit doing what they think is best for the club and taking us forward.

Kernahan is the best man for the job then right?
Look logic tells you that whilst he is there noone will oppose him... not cos hes good.. cos hes hopeless... but cos hes Sticks.. Captain of the century

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:55 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
Yes. By your logic kernahan is the best man for the job at the present time, Why? because there is no-one better to replace him, or wants to replace him or is being pushed to replace him. So he is the best for the job at present. End of story

_________________
Go BLues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:58 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
know when to declare....being on a boat is no excuse fror spilling a little beer on your T-shirt


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:02 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
baz_baz wrote:
Yes. By your logic kernahan is the best man for the job at the present time, Why? because there is no-one better to replace him, or wants to replace him or is being pushed to replace him. So he is the best for the job at present. End of story


Fahour is on a mission to raise stamps from 55c to 60c, after that give him a buzz.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:04 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
get rid of the hacks wrote:
baz_baz wrote:
Yes. By your logic kernahan is the best man for the job at the present time, Why? because there is no-one better to replace him, or wants to replace him or is being pushed to replace him. So he is the best for the job at present. End of story


Fahour is on a mission to raise stamps from 55c to 60c, after that give him a buzz.



He should be able to leave his stamp on the club :thumbsup:

_________________
Go BLues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
baz_baz wrote:
Yes. By your logic kernahan is the best man for the job at the present time, Why? because there is no-one better to replace him, or wants to replace him or is being pushed to replace him. So he is the best for the job at present. End of story

if sticks is the best president for this club.. we deseerve everything about to get dished out to us over his tenure as president....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
The President determines the direction of any football club. Sticks is SHIT! So is Brisbane's President, what's his name. And Adelaide's, that bloke. And Sydney's President, his culture is SHIT! Not sure what his name is though. And Fremantle's President. Man, he is a tosser, I reckon. I suppose he is. And the Gold Coast's President, he is going to destory that club. They are a rabble.

A good President will mean GF success: Geelong (Costa), Hawthorn (Kennett), 2006 ?? 2005 ?? 2004 The Scott guy?? You were wrong! 2003,2,1 ??? 2000 Sheedy 1999 BRAYSHAW!!!!!! 1998,7 Cornes? 1996 BRAYSHAW!!!!!

1995 JDE!!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
Like young Levi said this type of boat cruise happens at all AFL clubs, VFL clubs , domestic football clubs

Why we having a days of our lifes about it?

The players will have a hangover for 1 day and be pretty much close to 100% the day after.

IF this happened during the season i would be ropeable, but it is during the christmas period, its not right, but doesnt need all the emotions pouring out from members of talking carlton that its like dooms day for CFC.!!!!

Pull your head in people. Sticks will lay down the law jan 4th and if players don't pull the line they will be gone. simple as that

no need for people not to buy memberships, that is BS and l question any one on this site that wont buy a membership for CFC due to the boat cruise. IF you won't buy a membership you surely dont have carlton running thru your blood.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:05 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:32 am
Posts: 1077
Location: east coast
When Carlton people get together , the talk invariably goes back to the great premiership wins we had in the 60's , 70's , and 80's .
We were the best . :thumbsup: .
Not only on the field either . No-one , but no-one could drink the Carlton boys under the table . And we were proud of that too .

Boy , things have changed . :confused:

_________________
Get the facts first.
Then you can distort them at your leisure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:48 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
klakker wrote:
...Boy , things have changed . :confused:


..not for the time warpers :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer:

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15012
The AFL has issued Carlton with a please explain. Is this the same AFL that at an official AFL meeting (ie the Brownlow) fuelled everyone with free alcohol and then when all goes pear shaped claim no responsibilty? The same official AFL meeting (Brownlow) that shows players skulling drinks when one of them on the table gets votes and is shown on TV for all to see?
Adrian Anderson is nothing but a useless puppet and wants to be seen doing something so has asked for a please explain. Did Adelaide have to explain why Bock was only suspended for one week after assaulting has girlfriend? Probably not.
I dont condone what the players did on the cruise, and i hope they are made to sit through a session on binge drinking just to see what dangers there can be. What if this had been a players 21st Birthday during the off season and it got a bit boozy and out of control? There is a fine line between it being none of the AFL's business and players private time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
kezza wrote:
The AFL has issued Carlton with a please explain. Is this the same AFL that at an official AFL meeting (ie the Brownlow) fuelled everyone with free alcohol and then when all goes pear shaped claim no responsibilty? The same official AFL meeting (Brownlow) that shows players skulling drinks when one of them on the table gets votes and is shown on TV for all to see?
Adrian Anderson is nothing but a useless puppet and wants to be seen doing something so has asked for a please explain. Did Adelaide have to explain why Bock was only suspended for one week after assaulting has girlfriend? Probably not.
I dont condone what the players did on the cruise, and i hope they are made to sit through a session on binge drinking just to see what dangers there can be. What if this had been a players 21st Birthday during the off season and it got a bit boozy and out of control? There is a fine line between it being none of the AFL's business and players private time.

Players dont have private time.The sooner they realise this the better it is for them
Theyre not paid big money to do as they please.

Im glad the AFL is stepping in.

As a matter of fact the time has come for the AFL to set up a tribunal for player conduct away from footy.
I dont believe the clubs are strong enough to dish out appropriate sanctions on their own accord.
If Fev had been whacked around the head with AFL sanctioned suspensions he would still be at the club.
Fines just dont cut it.
You hurt footballers by suspensions and then compound suspensions.

Its for their own good.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
Synbad wrote:
kezza wrote:
The AFL has issued Carlton with a please explain. Is this the same AFL that at an official AFL meeting (ie the Brownlow) fuelled everyone with free alcohol and then when all goes pear shaped claim no responsibilty? The same official AFL meeting (Brownlow) that shows players skulling drinks when one of them on the table gets votes and is shown on TV for all to see?
Adrian Anderson is nothing but a useless puppet and wants to be seen doing something so has asked for a please explain. Did Adelaide have to explain why Bock was only suspended for one week after assaulting has girlfriend? Probably not.
I dont condone what the players did on the cruise, and i hope they are made to sit through a session on binge drinking just to see what dangers there can be. What if this had been a players 21st Birthday during the off season and it got a bit boozy and out of control? There is a fine line between it being none of the AFL's business and players private time.

Players dont have private time.The sooner they realise this the better it is for them
Theyre not paid big money to do as they please.

Im glad the AFL is stepping in.

As a matter of fact the time has come for the AFL to set up a tribunal for player conduct away from footy.
I dont believe the clubs are strong enough to dish out appropriate sanctions on their own accord.
If Fev had been whacked around the head with AFL sanctioned suspensions he would still be at the club.
Fines just dont cut it.
You hurt footballers by suspensions and then compound suspensions.

Its for their own good.


That's a bit fascist...

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Synbad wrote:
kezza wrote:
The AFL has issued Carlton with a please explain. Is this the same AFL that at an official AFL meeting (ie the Brownlow) fuelled everyone with free alcohol and then when all goes pear shaped claim no responsibilty? The same official AFL meeting (Brownlow) that shows players skulling drinks when one of them on the table gets votes and is shown on TV for all to see?
Adrian Anderson is nothing but a useless puppet and wants to be seen doing something so has asked for a please explain. Did Adelaide have to explain why Bock was only suspended for one week after assaulting has girlfriend? Probably not.
I dont condone what the players did on the cruise, and i hope they are made to sit through a session on binge drinking just to see what dangers there can be. What if this had been a players 21st Birthday during the off season and it got a bit boozy and out of control? There is a fine line between it being none of the AFL's business and players private time.

Players dont have private time.The sooner they realise this the better it is for them
Theyre not paid big money to do as they please.

Im glad the AFL is stepping in.

As a matter of fact the time has come for the AFL to set up a tribunal for player conduct away from footy.
I dont believe the clubs are strong enough to dish out appropriate sanctions on their own accord.
If Fev had been whacked around the head with AFL sanctioned suspensions he would still be at the club.
Fines just dont cut it.
You hurt footballers by suspensions and then compound suspensions.

Its for their own good.


Scary as it sounds, I agree almost totally with Synners.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:19 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Synbad wrote:
kezza wrote:
The AFL has issued Carlton with a please explain. Is this the same AFL that at an official AFL meeting (ie the Brownlow) fuelled everyone with free alcohol and then when all goes pear shaped claim no responsibilty? The same official AFL meeting (Brownlow) that shows players skulling drinks when one of them on the table gets votes and is shown on TV for all to see?
Adrian Anderson is nothing but a useless puppet and wants to be seen doing something so has asked for a please explain. Did Adelaide have to explain why Bock was only suspended for one week after assaulting has girlfriend? Probably not.
I dont condone what the players did on the cruise, and i hope they are made to sit through a session on binge drinking just to see what dangers there can be. What if this had been a players 21st Birthday during the off season and it got a bit boozy and out of control? There is a fine line between it being none of the AFL's business and players private time.

Players dont have private time.The sooner they realise this the better it is for them
Theyre not paid big money to do as they please.

Im glad the AFL is stepping in.

As a matter of fact the time has come for the AFL to set up a tribunal for player conduct away from footy.
I dont believe the clubs are strong enough to dish out appropriate sanctions on their own accord.
If Fev had been whacked around the head with AFL sanctioned suspensions he would still be at the club.
Fines just dont cut it.
You hurt footballers by suspensions and then compound suspensions.

Its for their own good.


Scary as it sounds, I agree almost totally with Synners.


So's that.

If AFL player's not having a private life is such a great idea, why don't we all opt in to it. :thumbsup:
Maybe with everyone's everything out in the open will a more accepting and empathetic society will blossom.

I'll see you guys on twitter. :thumbsup:

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:49 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15012
Synbad wrote:
kezza wrote:
The AFL has issued Carlton with a please explain. Is this the same AFL that at an official AFL meeting (ie the Brownlow) fuelled everyone with free alcohol and then when all goes pear shaped claim no responsibilty? The same official AFL meeting (Brownlow) that shows players skulling drinks when one of them on the table gets votes and is shown on TV for all to see?
Adrian Anderson is nothing but a useless puppet and wants to be seen doing something so has asked for a please explain. Did Adelaide have to explain why Bock was only suspended for one week after assaulting has girlfriend? Probably not.
I dont condone what the players did on the cruise, and i hope they are made to sit through a session on binge drinking just to see what dangers there can be. What if this had been a players 21st Birthday during the off season and it got a bit boozy and out of control? There is a fine line between it being none of the AFL's business and players private time.

Players dont have private time.The sooner they realise this the better it is for them
Theyre not paid big money to do as they please.

Im glad the AFL is stepping in.

As a matter of fact the time has come for the AFL to set up a tribunal for player conduct away from footy.
I dont believe the clubs are strong enough to dish out appropriate sanctions on their own accord.
If Fev had been whacked around the head with AFL sanctioned suspensions he would still be at the club.
Fines just dont cut it.
You hurt footballers by suspensions and then compound suspensions.

Its for their own good.

We will have to agree to disagree on this one. I still think players deserve private time as we all do.
Anyway, Happy New Year to all and lets be rid of the decade from hell and look forward to 2010.
Have a safe new year and see you next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:49 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..some footballers don't think.. ..lookit, i used to get thoroughly trashed on all sorts of party shite for years, and never wound up gettin' collected for D&D, get into fights, get kicked off boat cruises etc etc etc.. ..if you can't hold yer liquor, or drugs.. ..then they're not for you.. ..it's not rocket science.... ..and this is without all the extra incentive of big money, celebrity status etc etc.. ..not to mention that quite simply, nowadays, stuff they get up to even during the off-season will reflect back on the club.. ..like it or lump it, that's how it goes.. ..when you have the team get together, it's a team events.. ..the date on the calender makes no difference..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
fraser murphy wrote:
Synbad wrote:
kezza wrote:
The AFL has issued Carlton with a please explain. Is this the same AFL that at an official AFL meeting (ie the Brownlow) fuelled everyone with free alcohol and then when all goes pear shaped claim no responsibilty? The same official AFL meeting (Brownlow) that shows players skulling drinks when one of them on the table gets votes and is shown on TV for all to see?
Adrian Anderson is nothing but a useless puppet and wants to be seen doing something so has asked for a please explain. Did Adelaide have to explain why Bock was only suspended for one week after assaulting has girlfriend? Probably not.
I dont condone what the players did on the cruise, and i hope they are made to sit through a session on binge drinking just to see what dangers there can be. What if this had been a players 21st Birthday during the off season and it got a bit boozy and out of control? There is a fine line between it being none of the AFL's business and players private time.

Players dont have private time.The sooner they realise this the better it is for them
Theyre not paid big money to do as they please.

Im glad the AFL is stepping in.

As a matter of fact the time has come for the AFL to set up a tribunal for player conduct away from footy.
I dont believe the clubs are strong enough to dish out appropriate sanctions on their own accord.
If Fev had been whacked around the head with AFL sanctioned suspensions he would still be at the club.
Fines just dont cut it.
You hurt footballers by suspensions and then compound suspensions.

Its for their own good.


That's a bit fascist...


Well, you might think its fascist but if you take a look around you .. youre governed by rules and laws with everything you do.
And of course players players are no different.
Only the idiotic footballers will find this abit Draconian.. the vast majority wont have it bother them.
Alcohol is a problem right now and it needs to be stamped out.

It used to be alcohol.. and then they discovered amphetimines..youre not going to get fat... and its trendy.. its a modern 'in drug'.. now with the bunsen burner is on the drug use.. players are moving back to alcohol...

But why do they need foreign agents to feel good???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:24 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
I think its a disgrace. I think the so-called leaders of the playing group are as weak as piss for not doing something on the cruise. I think the individuals concerned are weak as piss for thinking they could do it and get away with it.
I am waiting to see what happens at the club before I pay my membership. If nothing concrete does happen, I intend to write to them and ask how they intend to sort the mess out before I keep donating money to them every year. We don't need this rubbish and we certainly have a voice as members and supporters.

Personally I hope the three of them are banned for the entire NAB cup and told that Rd 1 selection will depend on NAB form alone. Let them stew in the Ants for a while. I'd rather lose a few games than carry this on during the year. Even Collingwood had the balls to suspend two players leading up to and during finals. Surely we can do it.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 125 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group