Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 5:54 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 10:20 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
Melvey wrote:
cj69 wrote:
Too me this is becoming more and more prevelant.

We seem to look for little bits of excitment or potential in a lot of our players but they are simply not up to it.

Time for the club to make some tough decisions and get games into the kids. As much as I hate to admit it Essendon* are showing us the way by backing their kids and are playing exciting football.

Watch us and we are slow and boring. More like watching Sydney and I hate it. Sides are jumping all over it and we are playing into their hands. Stop Judd and we are stuffed.

Need to cut the crap and put a line through these gusy for the rest of the year.

Wiggins
Cloke
Bentley
Stevens
Edwards
Bentick
Houlihan
Fisher
Russell

Need to get games into the following over the rest of the year:

Anderson
Browne
Garlett
Yarran
Ellard
Bannister
Robinson
Johnson
Austin
Armfield
Pfieffer
Jamison
Joseph
Warnock
Hartlett
Setanta

We know what the top can do and they don't have it. Get games into the bottom list and give them an opportunity to prove themselves.

Also need to look at other options and try some things:

Thornton to the forward line
Kruezer to FF
Joseph & Robbo on the ball
Defence built around Browne, Anderson, Jamo, Austin & Bower and leave them there and let them get used to playing with each other.
Play Yarran, Betts & Garlett together on the forward line under Fev and Kruezer.
Jacobs/Hampson & Warnock to do the rucking.
If Hartlett is too play it is at FB
If Setanta is too play, play him in one position and give him a decent go.

Stop making too many bloody changes in a game and let the players settle. Does nothing for their development throwing them around.

Let the players run and carry and take the game on. Do not worry about mistakes because at the moment our football is reactive NOT proactive!!!


You say we Need to cut the crap and put a line through these guys for the rest of the year: Stevens and Russell

but you wanna get games into the for the rest of the year: Bannister and Pfieffer???

Today is the 25th of May not the 1st of April



The simple fact is that Stevens will NOT play beyond this year so what is the point. Russell has now played over 50 games yet has gone nowhere.

Bannister and Pfieffer have been given bugger all of a go and atleast deserve the chance to show what they can do. Then at the end of the season the club can make an INFORMED decision on all their futures.

Logical?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
cj69 wrote:
Melvey wrote:
cj69 wrote:
Too me this is becoming more and more prevelant.

We seem to look for little bits of excitment or potential in a lot of our players but they are simply not up to it.

Time for the club to make some tough decisions and get games into the kids. As much as I hate to admit it Essendon* are showing us the way by backing their kids and are playing exciting football.

Watch us and we are slow and boring. More like watching Sydney and I hate it. Sides are jumping all over it and we are playing into their hands. Stop Judd and we are stuffed.

Need to cut the crap and put a line through these gusy for the rest of the year.

Wiggins
Cloke
Bentley
Stevens
Edwards
Bentick
Houlihan
Fisher
Russell

Need to get games into the following over the rest of the year:

Anderson
Browne
Garlett
Yarran
Ellard
Bannister
Robinson
Johnson
Austin
Armfield
Pfieffer
Jamison
Joseph
Warnock
Hartlett
Setanta

We know what the top can do and they don't have it. Get games into the bottom list and give them an opportunity to prove themselves.

Also need to look at other options and try some things:

Thornton to the forward line
Kruezer to FF
Joseph & Robbo on the ball
Defence built around Browne, Anderson, Jamo, Austin & Bower and leave them there and let them get used to playing with each other.
Play Yarran, Betts & Garlett together on the forward line under Fev and Kruezer.
Jacobs/Hampson & Warnock to do the rucking.
If Hartlett is too play it is at FB
If Setanta is too play, play him in one position and give him a decent go.

Stop making too many bloody changes in a game and let the players settle. Does nothing for their development throwing them around.

Let the players run and carry and take the game on. Do not worry about mistakes because at the moment our football is reactive NOT proactive!!!


You say we Need to cut the crap and put a line through these guys for the rest of the year: Stevens and Russell

but you wanna get games into the for the rest of the year: Bannister and Pfieffer???

Today is the 25th of May not the 1st of April



The simple fact is that Stevens will NOT play beyond this year so what is the point. Russell has now played over 50 games yet has gone nowhere.

Bannister and Pfieffer have been given bugger all of a go and atleast deserve the chance to show what they can do. Then at the end of the season the club can make an INFORMED decision on all their futures.

Logical?


No. If Ratten and co need to give Banno and Pfieffer a few games to see if they have anything to offer than GOD HELP US...... surely there papaers have been stamped

Why couldn't Stevens play beyond this year. One of the better users by foot in our team. Hits Fev lace out and played a great game n the weekend

Russell has become the new whipping boy. I have seen improvement in him and is young enough to develop further...... how old is Banno???

Is it Russells fault that the club used pick 9 on him. If he was a pick 36 you'd all be singing his praises


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 10:37 am 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
I think Banno needs to be given a chance.

He hasn't played this year at all and was very good in the games he played last year before injury.

His papers shouldn't be stamped just yet as there is place in the side ie blocking for Judd.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 10:39 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
I wanna point out i wouldnt be too worried about the playing list 'deadwood' yet.
When we play the unaccountable teams that just wanna play footy... we hold our own in shoot outs and would beat most.(So we would be a great AFL park team)Tells me talent wise were at least the equals of mst teams.. and probaby way more taented than alot
Where we struggle is when we play opposition teams that are coached and have structures and gameplans that are disciplined and organised.
That suggests what area were struggling with in the AFL......

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 10:42 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4949
DownUnderChick wrote:
I think Banno needs to be given a chance.

He hasn't played this year at all and was very good in the games he played last year before injury.

His papers shouldn't be stamped just yet as there is place in the side ie blocking for Judd.


I agree.
Time to give Banno a run in the seniors.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 10:56 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Now we are getting desperate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:06 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16974
Location: Melbourne
cj69 wrote:
Bannister and Pfieffer have been given bugger all of a go and atleast deserve the chance to show what they can do. Then at the end of the season the club can make an INFORMED decision on all their futures.

Logical?


Yes except.....

Pfeiffer has been injured since about RD 1 or 2 and still isn't back for a few weeks yet
Banno had a late start due to injury and was just coming back well in the VFL with 2 or 3 strong games before getting a week reported.

As for Stevo I have no idea about 2010. Is he contracted?

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:14 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
Cazzesman wrote:
cj69 wrote:
Bannister and Pfieffer have been given bugger all of a go and atleast deserve the chance to show what they can do. Then at the end of the season the club can make an INFORMED decision on all their futures.

Logical?


Yes except.....

Pfeiffer has been injured since about RD 1 or 2 and still isn't back for a few weeks yet
Banno had a late start due to injury and was just coming back well in the VFL with 2 or 3 strong games before getting a week reported.

As for Stevo I have no idea about 2010. Is he contracted?

Regards Cazzesman


I agree but I am talking about the rest of the year. Banno is close to a recall and I believe his size and attitude would be a positive. I would hope Pfieffer gets a decent run in the second half of the year.

As for Stevens I understand he is contracted but if the injury is what I understand I am sure something will be worked out under the adviso of the AFLPA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:20 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Most on here who analyse our list almost expect us to have 22 a-graders available for selection. Isn’t gonna happen. The requirement to play 22 players week in, week out means there will be some in the team who might be B or C grade, but at least have a role to play.

Other than Hawthorn, whose recruiting has been out of this world/unprecedented, there is not a team in the AFL without holes in it’s list. Even Geelong.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:21 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
Melvey wrote:
cj69 wrote:
Melvey wrote:
cj69 wrote:
Too me this is becoming more and more prevelant.

We seem to look for little bits of excitment or potential in a lot of our players but they are simply not up to it.

Time for the club to make some tough decisions and get games into the kids. As much as I hate to admit it Essendon* are showing us the way by backing their kids and are playing exciting football.

Watch us and we are slow and boring. More like watching Sydney and I hate it. Sides are jumping all over it and we are playing into their hands. Stop Judd and we are stuffed.

Need to cut the crap and put a line through these gusy for the rest of the year.

Wiggins
Cloke
Bentley
Stevens
Edwards
Bentick
Houlihan
Fisher
Russell

Need to get games into the following over the rest of the year:

Anderson
Browne
Garlett
Yarran
Ellard
Bannister
Robinson
Johnson
Austin
Armfield
Pfieffer
Jamison
Joseph
Warnock
Hartlett
Setanta

We know what the top can do and they don't have it. Get games into the bottom list and give them an opportunity to prove themselves.

Also need to look at other options and try some things:

Thornton to the forward line
Kruezer to FF
Joseph & Robbo on the ball
Defence built around Browne, Anderson, Jamo, Austin & Bower and leave them there and let them get used to playing with each other.
Play Yarran, Betts & Garlett together on the forward line under Fev and Kruezer.
Jacobs/Hampson & Warnock to do the rucking.
If Hartlett is too play it is at FB
If Setanta is too play, play him in one position and give him a decent go.

Stop making too many bloody changes in a game and let the players settle. Does nothing for their development throwing them around.

Let the players run and carry and take the game on. Do not worry about mistakes because at the moment our football is reactive NOT proactive!!!


You say we Need to cut the crap and put a line through these guys for the rest of the year: Stevens and Russell

but you wanna get games into the for the rest of the year: Bannister and Pfieffer???

Today is the 25th of May not the 1st of April



The simple fact is that Stevens will NOT play beyond this year so what is the point. Russell has now played over 50 games yet has gone nowhere.

Bannister and Pfieffer have been given bugger all of a go and atleast deserve the chance to show what they can do. Then at the end of the season the club can make an INFORMED decision on all their futures.

Logical?


No. If Ratten and co need to give Banno and Pfieffer a few games to see if they have anything to offer than GOD HELP US...... surely there papaers have been stamped

Why couldn't Stevens play beyond this year. One of the better users by foot in our team. Hits Fev lace out and played a great game n the weekend

Russell has become the new whipping boy. I have seen improvement in him and is young enough to develop further...... how old is Banno???

Is it Russells fault that the club used pick 9 on him. If he was a pick 36 you'd all be singing his praises



What a lot of absolute tripe. I don't care if they are Pick 1 or 100. When they get on the park we judge them on there ability to play AFL football. Russell wil be a handy player at BEST. If a player doesn't start to really contribute by 50-60 games then legitimate questions need to be asked. He has been given a lot fo leeway by the MC and is yet to deliver.

Banno is 26. Needs to show something I agree but should be atleast given the same opportunities as others have.

People are talking about bringing back Fisher?? What has he ever done?? He is a tall forward who averages 1 goal a game is slow and is a poor kick. I cannot EVER remember him taking hold of a game or dominating.

It is about time people stopped making excuses and looking for little bits of ability to hang their hats on.

It is mediocrity that got us to where we are and unless we address it we will sit along side Richmond for the next 20 years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:23 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 8:48 pm
Posts: 88
President: Kernahan
Coach: Ratten

* Reasons that Kernahan and Ratten have to go is that:
* Kernahan makes decisions about our club based on his heart, not his head. When you run a business, you can't let romances or friendships influence what is best for the organisation. I believe Kernahan did this when Ratten was appointed coach. I believe Carlton had decided our coach was either Voss or Ratten. Once Voss pulled out of the Carlton coaches job, I believe it was negligent that Ratten was appointed without doing what Essendon* and Hawthorn did, by interviewing a few candidates and appointing the best available coach. I believe Ratten was appointed due to him being an ex-Carlton player, rather than the best available person.
* If I remember correctly I believe Pratt wanted the best available (and was pushing for Roos or Worsfold), but Kernahan recommended Ratten.

I believe our club should have re-built off-field with non-Carlton people. This would have ensured that new fresh ideas from outside the club could have re-juvenated the club. Let's not forget, Kernahan was part of the Elliott legacy, and once Elliott was kicked out, then so should his followers have been kicked out off the board.

As far as players go, I believe the following players are either; not up to AFL standard, would not get a game at Geelong,may need a fresh start at a new club, or won't be around due to retirement or delisting when we play in a Grand Final:

Russell, Bentick, Johnson, Hadley, Fisher, Setanta, Hartlett, Armfield, Cloke, Bannister, Houlihan, Wiggins, Pfeiffer, Edwards, Hill, Carrazzo, Ellard, Bentley, Fevola (Retirement), Stevens (Retirement), Scotland (Retirement).

I'm not saying we should get rid of all these players this year, but I doubt they will be around when we next play in a Grand Final (which I believe is at least 3-4 years away), as they will either retire, be traded or delist for various reasons.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:24 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Most on here who analyse our list almost expect us to have 22 a-graders available for selection. Isn’t gonna happen. The requirement to play 22 players week in, week out means there will be some in the team who might be B or C grade, but at least have a role to play.

Other than Hawthorn, whose recruiting has been out of this world/unprecedented, there is not a team in the AFL without holes in it’s list. Even Geelong.



True. But we have a couple of A graders. a potential couple of A graders then most aren't even close to B or C grade yet we play them. On the weekend we had 10 players with less than 5 possessions by half time. Are they B,C, or D graders.

Once again Mediocrity! If you want to be at the top you need to make hard decisions and not accept medicority. At the moment we haven't got the peopel who can do it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:28 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
carltonac wrote:
If I remember correctly I believe Pratt wanted the best available (and was pushing for Roos or Worsfold), but Kernahan recommended Ratten.



Pratt actually said that if they are available they aren't the best. That is why he went to Collingwood and got Swann.

Were was Ratten? An asst to Pagan and was given the job. No one else seriously interviewed.

Absolute joke. Every other club forms committees, employs psychologists and performs a number of interviews and tests before deciding who gets the job.

Lets be serious, this is a billion dollar business and we still run it like a local pub. Still giving jobs to our mates.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:49 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16974
Location: Melbourne
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?:

Just as a matter of interest has anyone ever seen Synbad and CJ69 in the same room at the same time :smoking:

Just asking. :wink:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:52 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Cazzesman wrote:
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?:

Just as a matter of interest has anyone ever seen Synbad and CJ69 in the same room at the same time :smoking:

Just asking. :wink:



Regards Cazzesman


:razz:


People sometimes agree with each other and sometimes not.. and then on other things sometimes agree with each other and sometimes not.

Im pretty sure cj69 and i dont agree on everything.. and im pretty sure you and i agree on stuff sometimes too Cazz... hmmmmmmmm maybe not.. :wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:53 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16974
Location: Melbourne
cj69 wrote:
carltonac wrote:
If I remember correctly I believe Pratt wanted the best available (and was pushing for Roos or Worsfold), but Kernahan recommended Ratten.



Pratt actually said that if they are available they aren't the best. That is why he went to Collingwood and got Swann.

Were was Ratten? An asst to Pagan and was given the job. No one else seriously interviewed.

Absolute joke. Every other club forms committees, employs psychologists and performs a number of interviews and tests before deciding who gets the job.

Lets be serious, this is a billion dollar business and we still run it like a local pub. Still giving jobs to our mates.


But you can't have it both ways with Mr Pratt. The only reason he came back to the club was because he was approached by Sticks and Big Jack. He obviuosly though enough of Sticks to put his hand up. Mr Pratt was happy to have Sticks take over from him when the ACCC came knocking so what does that tell you. Obviously if Mr Pratt was happy for Sticks to take over then your argument is flawed.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:53 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
Cazzesman wrote:
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?:

Just as a matter of interest has anyone ever seen Synbad and CJ69 in the same room at the same time :smoking:

Just asking. :wink:

Regards Cazzesman



What are you questioning?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:57 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16974
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
:?: :?: :?: :?: :?:

Just as a matter of interest has anyone ever seen Synbad and CJ69 in the same room at the same time :smoking:

Just asking. :wink:



Regards Cazzesman


:razz:


People sometimes agree with each other and sometimes not.. and then on other things sometimes agree with each other and sometimes not.

Im pretty sure cj69 and i dont agree on everything.. and im pretty sure you and i agree on stuff sometimes too Cazz... hmmmmmmmm maybe not.. :wink:


As soon as I pull the 'once a season, dog with a bone, Synbad agenda' soap box from under you all will be good again. :grin:

I know you miss the old days at that Private school where you use to love verbally belting the Debating Team geeks about the ears like Sam Kekovich now does. :lol: Sadly this is now your outlet.................atleast the geeks a now safe. :wink:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:57 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Cazzesman wrote:
cj69 wrote:
carltonac wrote:
If I remember correctly I believe Pratt wanted the best available (and was pushing for Roos or Worsfold), but Kernahan recommended Ratten.



Pratt actually said that if they are available they aren't the best. That is why he went to Collingwood and got Swann.

Were was Ratten? An asst to Pagan and was given the job. No one else seriously interviewed.

Absolute joke. Every other club forms committees, employs psychologists and performs a number of interviews and tests before deciding who gets the job.

Lets be serious, this is a billion dollar business and we still run it like a local pub. Still giving jobs to our mates.


But you can't have it both ways with Mr Pratt. The only reason he came back to the club was because he was approached by Sticks and Big Jack. He obviuosly though enough of Sticks to put his hand up. Mr Pratt was happy to have Sticks take over from him when the ACCC came knocking so what does that tell you. Obviously if Mr Pratt was happy for Sticks to take over then your argument is flawed.

Regards Cazzesman



Yeah but Pratty was a supporter and he did suffer from idolatry in the footbaall sense..
Loved his Carlton champions....


But he did have it explained to him by Swann that he couldnt go out and pay for Pavlich Judd etc to just get a transfer to Carlton like the old days....

Swann said that...

So that would suggest he didnt get the modern day game...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 'DEADWOOD'
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:59 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
Cazzesman wrote:
cj69 wrote:
carltonac wrote:
If I remember correctly I believe Pratt wanted the best available (and was pushing for Roos or Worsfold), but Kernahan recommended Ratten.



Pratt actually said that if they are available they aren't the best. That is why he went to Collingwood and got Swann.

Were was Ratten? An asst to Pagan and was given the job. No one else seriously interviewed.

Absolute joke. Every other club forms committees, employs psychologists and performs a number of interviews and tests before deciding who gets the job.

Lets be serious, this is a billion dollar business and we still run it like a local pub. Still giving jobs to our mates.


But you can't have it both ways with Mr Pratt. The only reason he came back to the club was because he was approached by Sticks and Big Jack. He obviuosly though enough of Sticks to put his hand up. Mr Pratt was happy to have Sticks take over from him when the ACCC came knocking so what does that tell you. Obviously if Mr Pratt was happy for Sticks to take over then your argument is flawed.

Regards Cazzesman


Mr Pratt was smart enough to let people run areas he knwos nothing about. The issue is that Kernahan pushed for Ratten as coach without going through the correct process or identifying anyone else.

Certainly doesn't make my argument flawed actually enhances it. Even Mr Pratt made huge mistakes.

We went and got the best CEO yet we plucked an assistant with bugger all experience or background to bring a club that has been crap over the past decade back to the top.

Yet, we employ people who were at the club when it went to crap? Sometimes people are to close to see the issues.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group