Synbad wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Wow!
Some of you are rapt we didnt get done by 100 points.
We would have if it wernt tfor Juddy...
If only Pagan had Judd....
You cant compare us to teams that lost by 100 points... you must look at whats ahead of us to be a good side..
Not just to you synbad but to all others who have been ranting - if we had played well and were properly coached, what margin would you have expected? - and what margin will you be expecting for the port game?
For some reason, I'm expecting the generic - we need to see signs of improvement rather than any definitive statements. I'll preempt such responses by saying that I've seen plenty of gradual improvement throughout this season and signs of progress by our youngsters. If you cant, perhaps its because you refuse to do so (ie have unrealistic expectations)
Ok its noit about the margin or the win / loss.. its about the fundamentals...
Any blocking or shepherding??? Nope
Talk???nope
Structures??? nope!!!
Linking up???? Nope!!!
Just cos we have Judd doewsnt mean he is coaching better than Pagan.. does it???
We lack the fundamentals a team needs to go forward..
Theyre gut busting runs...
cohesion....
defensiveness
etc.....
Take Judd out of that soide and it IS 100 points....
So forget about wins and losses ... its about a team across the bpoard effort on the field and coaching...
Look at Collingwoood...!!!!
You cant say thgeyre older.... or more skilled can u???
But if they lose players numbers 12/14/ and 16 one week and bring in players numbers 35/ 36/37 .. those npo name players still fit in dont they????
They all run hard.. they all tackle and when its thgeir turn to put their heads over the balkl they will...
BUT..... they also play to a plan/... dont they???
how nice of you to choose collingwood as an example
1. malthouse has had about 10 seasons to develop a team, teach games plans, systems etc - every youngster drafted gets developed/taught the same way so when they come in, they know what to do - ratten has had 1 preseason (hasnt completed a season yet)
2. injuries - pies were missing only presti and rusling from their top 25 or so players. We were missing twice that from our starting back 6 (+houlihan/hadley who would contribute mature bodies/hardness)
3. A comparison between the 2 teams
pies - 9 players with 100+games (6 with 150 or more) (cats 11 players with 6 at 150+)
blues - 5 players with 100+games (1 with 150 or more)
pies average age - 24yrs 10 months (cats 25 yrs, 0 months)
blues average age - 23 yrs 0 months)
pies average games played 92.4 (cats 93.8 )
blues average games played 59.1
In otherwords the pies are virtually identical to the cats in development and pretty much 2 full seasons of footy ahead of us - If you included statistical player turnover/attrition rates that happen in ALL teams, then the figure would be closer to being 3-4 season behind in terms of player/team development.
4. The sub 50 games players
Pies had 8
wellingham - 4 games, 19yo 82 kgs, the skinny body
cox - 9 games, 22 yo, 94kgs mature body
brown - 10 games, 19yo, 97kg mature body
clarke - 20 games, 20yo, 84kgs matureish body
wood - 24 games, 21yo 105 kg mature body (twice experience of kreuzer+hampson combined)
bryan - 31 games, 26yo, 99kg mature body
obrien - 46 games, 21 yo 90kg matureish body
pendlebury - 42 games, 20yo, 88kgs matureish body
compare that to the blues
armfield - 1st game, 21yo, 77kgs (ie skinny)
browne - 5th game 19yo, 76 kgs (ie skinny)
hampson - 6th game, 20yo, 97kgs (ie skinny - for a 200+cm ruckman)
kreuzer - 8th game, 19yo, 97kgs (ie skinny for a 200+cm ruckman)
grigg - 13th game, 20 yo, 86kgs (semi mature body)
bower - 22nd game 20yo 90kg (ie skinny)
gibbs - 31st game 19yo, 82kgs (skinny)
cloke - 35th game, 23 yo, 105kgs (mature body - woohoo)
russell - 38th game, 21yo, 97kgs (mature body - thats 2)
setanta - 42nd game, 25yo, 100kgs (mature body - that makes 3!)
murphy 45th game, 20yo 80kgs (ie skinny, semi mature at best)
Again there is a discrepancy in age the pies have 3/8 players 20 or under, one of which is 97kgs whereas the blues have 7/11 who are sub 20, 2 of which are 97kgs (hamspon/kreuzer). Brown at 195cm and 97kgs competes ok for a KP defender - kreuzer/hampson who are 200/201cm and 97kgs are significantly undersized for the ruck and are getting smashed.''
Taking the above into account, how can you say that we are the same as collingwood and its just shit coaching/tactics?