Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 6:30 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2008 8:30 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Since when has being a smooth media operator determine wether you are a good coach or not.


Did anyone say that being a smooth media operator makes you a good coach?


For alll we now Ratts could be a hack coach but the perception is he not cause he presents well when on TV. Who gives two hoots about how any coach answers question on a TV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2008 8:43 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:18 pm
Posts: 675
Location: Adelaide
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Since when has being a smooth media operator determine wether you are a good coach or not.


Did anyone say that being a smooth media operator makes you a good coach?


For alll we now Ratts could be a hack coach but the perception is he not cause he presents well when on TV. Who gives two hoots about how any coach answers question on a TV


Sponsors care.

Supportors care.

A lot of people care how our club is portrayed in the media.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 21, 2008 11:40 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
SA Blue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Since when has being a smooth media operator determine wether you are a good coach or not.


Did anyone say that being a smooth media operator makes you a good coach?


For alll we now Ratts could be a hack coach but the perception is he not cause he presents well when on TV. Who gives two hoots about how any coach answers question on a TV


Sponsors care.

Supportors care.

A lot of people care how our club is portrayed in the media.



A coach is appointed to coach. There's the CEO, football operations manager or even the captain who can help sell the club.

So if Leigh Matthews or Paul Roos were shit in the media you would sack them.

It's the biggest load of crap. Everyone journo has taken full advantage of his weakness and ran with it.

Mick Malthouse is such a rude person. How he talks to young journalists learning the trade is an absolute disgrace but yet you don't read article after article or listen talk back about his poor performances.

Matty Knights and Dean Bailey's teams are performing far worse than Mark Harveys right now, because they speak well we can cut them some slack. Some media personalities actually picked Melbourne to do well and not a harsh word has been written or said about them bar shit boardroom politics.

Talk about real issues that matter, not petty bullshit headline grabbing negative crap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 11:20 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Since when has being a smooth media operator determine wether you are a good coach or not.


Did anyone say that being a smooth media operator makes you a good coach?


For alll we now Ratts could be a hack coach but the perception is he not cause he presents well when on TV. Who gives two hoots about how any coach answers question on a TV


Well seeing as stevens has played under 4 coaches including the very highly rated Mark Williams, I would say that he is in a better position to judge Ratts as a coach than us from over the fence.

Stevo had this to say "I've learnt as much off Ratts in the last 12 months, even when he was an assistant coach, as I have in my whole career"

From the age article http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/p ... ntentSwap2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 11:40 am 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Melvey wrote:
SA Blue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Since when has being a smooth media operator determine wether you are a good coach or not.


Did anyone say that being a smooth media operator makes you a good coach?


For alll we now Ratts could be a hack coach but the perception is he not cause he presents well when on TV. Who gives two hoots about how any coach answers question on a TV


Sponsors care.

Supportors care.

A lot of people care how our club is portrayed in the media.



A coach is appointed to coach. There's the CEO, football operations manager or even the captain who can help sell the club.

So if Leigh Matthews or Paul Roos were shit in the media you would sack them.

It's the biggest load of crap. Everyone journo has taken full advantage of his weakness and ran with it.

Mick Malthouse is such a rude person. How he talks to young journalists learning the trade is an absolute disgrace but yet you don't read article after article or listen talk back about his poor performances.

Matty Knights and Dean Bailey's teams are performing far worse than Mark Harveys right now, because they speak well we can cut them some slack. Some media personalities actually picked Melbourne to do well and not a harsh word has been written or said about them bar shit boardroom politics.

Talk about real issues that matter, not petty bullshit headline grabbing negative crap.


It is your perception that he is a hack because he isn't following the Melvey school of coaching.

You can't honestly be that simplistic responding to SA Blue's post?

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 1:40 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
If a coach struggles to answer questions that he would know the answers to in an interview then I would find it hard to have confidence in him communicating effectively with players or making match day decisions while under pressure.

Media performance and coaching ability aren't diametrically opposed.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 6:26 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
SA Blue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Since when has being a smooth media operator determine wether you are a good coach or not.


Did anyone say that being a smooth media operator makes you a good coach?


For alll we now Ratts could be a hack coach but the perception is he not cause he presents well when on TV. Who gives two hoots about how any coach answers question on a TV


Sponsors care.

Supportors care.

A lot of people care how our club is portrayed in the media.



A coach is appointed to coach. There's the CEO, football operations manager or even the captain who can help sell the club.

So if Leigh Matthews or Paul Roos were shit in the media you would sack them.

It's the biggest load of crap. Everyone journo has taken full advantage of his weakness and ran with it.

Mick Malthouse is such a rude person. How he talks to young journalists learning the trade is an absolute disgrace but yet you don't read article after article or listen talk back about his poor performances.

Matty Knights and Dean Bailey's teams are performing far worse than Mark Harveys right now, because they speak well we can cut them some slack. Some media personalities actually picked Melbourne to do well and not a harsh word has been written or said about them bar shit boardroom politics.

Talk about real issues that matter, not petty bullshit headline grabbing negative crap.


It is your perception that he is a hack because he isn't following the Melvey school of coaching.

You can't honestly be that simplistic responding to SA Blue's post?


get over it DUC and move on


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 7:00 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 7:36 pm
Posts: 557
Location: In the coach's box
What concerned me in one of the Stevens articles was he referred to Ratten as a 'mate'. The best coaches aren't players mates.

It was noticable Ratts looked to harden up his persona On the Couch, as oposed to his interview on Footy Classified early this year. I think Ratten is a quick learner.... and will prove some people on this forum wrong.

_________________
17 4 10


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 7:38 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:50 pm
Posts: 98
Location: Gate 3, Princes Park
Josh Kaplan wrote:
Hes not the best media performer but he sure loves the club


I thought he did very well. 9/10. And when i compare him to July 2007 when he was appointed as caretaker coach, he has improved out of sight.
He is growing in the role, as we all do with time and experience.
He has exceeded my expectations so far and without being bias to a carlton legend, i reckon he will make a very good allround coach. Time will tell, but the signs are there, b/c he is ticking all the boxes.

Of all the coaches i see on tv, i'd rate him in the top 5 in media performance.

_________________
Friends, Carltonians, countrymen, lend me your ears
Now is the time - The time is now.
If you want it, come and claim it....if you dare.
One day, very very soon.....we will ride again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 9:10 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:32 am
Posts: 1077
Location: east coast
I rate media performance pretty low in assessing a coach . Look at John Kennedy . His main reply to questions from the media was "no comment" . As for Ratts , he's going pretty well right now and is learning each week . Way in front any of the other rookie coaches . For those that aren't happy with him , who would you want to take his place?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 9:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16984
Location: Melbourne
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Since when has being a smooth media operator determine wether you are a good coach or not.


Did anyone say that being a smooth media operator makes you a good coach?


For alll we now Ratts could be a hack coach but the perception is he not cause he presents well when on TV. Who gives two hoots about how any coach answers question on a TV


That is one of the most naive things you have ever posted.......and thats saying something.

If a Coach gets up on TV and comes across as the Village Idiot are you trying to tell us that has no detrimental effect on the Club, Players, Sponsors, Coterie Groups, Board Members, Supporters etc etc etc.

I know the group I have listed would much preferred to see a performance like Rats put up rather than the one Harvey presented.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 9:59 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Cazzesman wrote:
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Since when has being a smooth media operator determine wether you are a good coach or not.


Did anyone say that being a smooth media operator makes you a good coach?


For alll we now Ratts could be a hack coach but the perception is he not cause he presents well when on TV. Who gives two hoots about how any coach answers question on a TV


That is one of the most naive things you have ever posted.......and thats saying something.

If a Coach gets up on TV and comes across as the Village Idiot are you trying to tell us that has no detrimental effect on the Club, Players, Sponsors, Coterie Groups, Board Members, Supporters etc etc etc.

I know the group I have listed would much preferred to see a performance like Rats put up rather than the one Harvey presented.

Regards Cazzesman


I couldn't care less.

At the end of the day its football.

Actions speaks louder than words

Next please.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 11:22 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
The Duke wrote:
We do need more of these. If we don't win this week, we're in danger of being 3-8 which will be worse than last year.

Last year we didn't have Judd, Kreuz and Stevo (just in case you didn't realise) :wink: .

It's becoming a little embarrassing. We should be looking at at least 4 and possibly 5 wins to half way.


Regardless we wont go 0-11 in the second half, I promise :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 11:46 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24647
Location: Kaloyasena
Cazzesman wrote:
If a Coach gets up on TV and comes across as the Village Idiot............



I remember the Policeman, the Construction Worker, the Bikie and the Indian but who was this bloke again????? :P


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 22, 2008 11:58 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
barass wrote:
What concerned me in one of the Stevens articles was he referred to Ratten as a 'mate'. The best coaches aren't players mates.

It was noticable Ratts looked to harden up his persona On the Couch, as oposed to his interview on Footy Classified early this year. I think Ratten is a quick learner.... and will prove some people on this forum wrong.


Stevo also said he wanted to go into battle with Ratts, surely a good thing. Geelong and Hawthorn players seem to get along with their respective coaches, I see Ratt's in that mould.

We had the ultimate non-matey coach in Pagan - that wasnt going so well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 12:37 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Synbad wrote:
Somebody said to me in here on some wasted post "why dont you want Mundy he has precision disposal".. or something...

I didnt say i dont want Mundy if he didnt fall of the back of the truck and into our arms..........

I said we NEED Warnock for a variety of reasons before looking at anybody else....

The truth is we need players .. but realistically youre not going to get a bunch of them are you....

Unless you get a bunch of duds....


Mundy doesnt have the long penetrating disposal coming out of the backine that we NEED...

We ALREADY HAVE heaps of Mundy types...!!!.. would i have Mundy RATHER than Russelll???

of course!!!


Don't we also have heaps of potential Warnocks? (two, at least :? ).

Seriously; where does that leave Hampson and Kreuzer? I probably wouldn't have replied if it were not ruckmen we were referring to but ruckmen are the most difficult players to utilise to any great advantage anywhere else on the field. In saying that, why must we stop almost everything when a player becomes available who may help out with a transitory weakness? Today's needs are often tomorrow's strengths and vice-versa.

We should be looking at the most economical way of strengthening our overall list. We should be gaining strengths not concentrating on weaknesses. I'm sick of hearing the word 'need' because it is all so finite. We need to think big and and look at what we might 'want'.

To me the whole Carlton saga is in risk of becoming one long drawn out story of a club chasing its own tail.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 11:17 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
barass wrote:
What concerned me in one of the Stevens articles was he referred to Ratten as a 'mate'. The best coaches aren't players mates.



That's a very 1970's way of looking at it.

Who would you rate as being the best coaches out there at the moment? Tompson, Roo's, Clarkson, and maybe even Worsfold all have a very close relationship that could be seen as mates and yet 3 of them currently and I would suggest all of them soon are premiership coaches.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 5:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16984
Location: Melbourne
AGRO wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
If a Coach gets up on TV and comes across as the Village Idiot............



I remember the Policeman, the Construction Worker, the Bikie and the Indian but who was this bloke again????? :P


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


He changed his name by deed poll to something far more catchy and now heads up the 'Anti WH' fraternity. ;-)

Normally you can catch him standing on a milk crate, bible in hand, outside the Melbourne public library most Sunday mornings. He's surrounded by other like minded dribbling souls who stand out from the passing parade due to their flaming torches.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 6:33 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
Saw the interview a couple of times and thought he spoke well.

What I would like however, is that when our coach or members of the football department might give us a better idea of certain players and where they see the current list. Not just the typical lines but some in depth comments.

Sometimes its better to have the facts than ongoing rumours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 23, 2008 7:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Sometimes its better to keep your cards close to your chest than let the world know whats going on.

If it means Freo don't get an edge from Ratts sharing knowledge of our players, I'm happy to be kept in the dark as well.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group