Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 7:19 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 396 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 20  Next

Should Carlton lose the last 8 games this season and get the Priority Pick
YES - lets get picks 1 and 3 this year and be a force for the next 10 seasons 83%  83%  [ 123 ]
NO - we will be right with what we've got 17%  17%  [ 25 ]
Total votes : 148
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:24 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
It's gonna be a long time before we see 17. Some of us won't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:25 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 10:04 pm
Posts: 308
Location: Regent
Collingwood played dead at the end of 2005 and lost their last 9 matches. The reward was Thomas and Pendlebury. Pick 2 & 5 in the draft.
If those smartarses can do it why shouldn't we.

We are in a dilemma.

_________________
WE ARE CARLTON, WE ARE ARROGANT AND WE LOVE IT!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Loyal Carltonian wrote:
Collingwood played dead at the end of 2005 and lost their last 9 matches. The reward was Thomas and Pendlebury. Pick 2 & 5 in the draft.
If those smartarses can do it why shouldn't we.

We are in a dilemma.


We did it last year and we got 1 & 17.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Oh, and we did it the year before and got 1 & 4.

Why not do it again this year? 3rd time lucky.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:46 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
verbs wrote:
Oh, and we did it the year before and got 1 & 4.

Why not do it again this year? 3rd time lucky.


Nothing to do with luck.
We did it and were ahead of where we would have been without Murphy and Gibbs.
Excellent planning for the future by having those two guns.
We need more though.....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Collingwood on the other hand do it once and are the model we should be following.

They are top four having done it once and we are bottom four having done it three times.

"It's a sad sad situation" said Reggie Dwight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
verbs wrote:
Collingwood on the other hand do it once and are the model we should be following.

They are top four having done it once and we are bottom four having done it three times.

"It's a sad sad situation" said Reggie Dwight.


I dont think Eddie would let us wear black and white stripes... their model is their model..... you know they have won one premiership in fifty years though dont you???

We wear navy blue with a white CFC on the front...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Speaking of Collingwood, they had a graphic during the St Kilda game saying they had played 8 debutants this year. I haven't bothered to check if that's true, but if it is that's HUGE consideringthey are sitting 4th with a dinosaur as their coach.

BUT...it then said they are ranked No1 in the league, I assume statistically.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
You must remember to read posts in a thread synbad...you don't remember this just a few posts up?

Discussion.

verbs wrote:
Loyal Carltonian wrote:
Collingwood played dead at the end of 2005 and lost their last 9 matches. The reward was Thomas and Pendlebury. Pick 2 & 5 in the draft.
If those smartarses can do it why shouldn't we.

We are in a dilemma.


We did it last year and we got 1 & 17.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:16 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
verbs wrote:
Speaking of Collingwood, they had a graphic during the St Kilda game saying they had played 8 debutants this year. I haven't bothered to check if that's true, but if it is that's HUGE consideringthey are sitting 4th with a dinosaur as their coach.

BUT...it then said they are ranked No1 in the league, I assume statistically.


Last week Collingwood had 4 players in their team who had debuted in 2007.

Carlton also had 4 players in its team who had debuted in 2007.

Check out the leadership group to see the difference in the sides.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:54 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 12617
Location: Brisbane
verbs wrote:
Collingwood on the other hand do it once and are the model we should be following.

They are top four having done it once and we are bottom four having done it three times.

"It's a sad sad situation" said Reggie Dwight.


In fact, Reggie has just given permission for our boys to release a tribute album, titled "I Guess That's Why They Call It The Blues".

Featuring the tracks:

The Captain and The Kid - performed by Red and Gibbsy

I Don't Wanna Go On With You Like That - performed by B Fevola

Passengers - performed by half the bloody team.

Part Time Love - performed by D Parkin

Sorry Seems To Be The Hardest Word - performed by Bandleader D Pagan

I'm Still Standing - performed by any player who can keep his feet

The Bitch Is Back - performed by B Mitchell



and a special bonus track

Rocket Man I think It's Going To Be A Long, Long Time - performed by special guest , Synbad.

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:04 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Is it tanking if we don't play Lance and give ourselves a better chance of winning by having 22 fit players on the ground? :?

I hope Lance's biggest supporters on TC will call for his return if the kids look like they'll influence some matches. :wink: :lol:

The game against Collingwood would be a great week for Lance to return to the senior line up and play on Rocca. :oops:

Whitnall's absence stretches out
Great work from Icke.

"He hasn't yet been able to get back on the track and do any football-related training. He's doing a lot of cross-training at the moment and weight work but until such time as he can put a couple of weeks work on the track he's really not available for selection," Icke said.

"And I think the opinion is that he's at least a week away from a return to the track. He's certainly making some progress but the last injection he had a reaction to. Not that that's unusual. It doesn't normally happen but it can happen that there is an adverse reaction. As a consequence, there's a bit more swelling than there would normally be and we're treating that at the moment. It's a setback but certainly not season-ending. Not at this stage."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:14 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
budzy wrote:
IMO, the systematic development of the players we’ve got NOW is the top priority and ranks above the ‘tank’ issue.
Watching Wayne Carey on channel 9 last night mockingly state that Melbourne has a better long term list than Carlton really frustrated me because glib & uninformed views such as his affects the morale of lot of Carlton supporters who are less informed than most of us here on TC.

With thanks to the Mr. Pratt and the CFC Board we now have the offield financial status of the club in a healthy position.
This now is allowing us to put in place a modern day professional player development team.
I believe we have the basic raw structure of an elite playing list and no matter where we finish down the ladder this year we will shortly add at least one more top 5 draft talent.

With professional systematic personal development, the likes of…
Russell, Bentick, Blackwell, Carrazzo, Jackson, Walker, Murphy, Gibbs (running mechanics, disposal technique & offensive strategies)
Hartlett, Kennedy, O’hAilpin, Austin, Waite, Edwards (strength , agility, disposal technique and tactical strategies)
A.O’hAilpin, Hampson, Jacobs (Rucking contest techniques & offensive strategies)
Austin, O’hAilpin, Waite, Hartlett, Bower, Anderson, Thornton, Grigg, Raso, Benjamin (defensive teamwork strategies, link up rebounding offensive strategies)
…will all markedly improve I have no doubt.

We have absolute raw talent, all with huge upside, basically running around with not much of an idea of how and what it takes to be successfull at AFL level IMO.
We have or are about to employ a real development team.
All we need is a newly formed fresh young coaching panel that has a positive personal development philosophy that meshes together to form a collective team orientated spirit to reach the ultimate goal …the 17th.

So basically, out with Pagan immediately, bring in the new Senior Coach and his team together with the new development team and get to work on our young players ASAP.
If that brings wins in the short term so be it, if it doesn’t so be it.


Top post. Thinking deaper that the one dimensional "get ONE extra pick at the top and be a force for 10 years". What a ridiculous thread title.

I agree with Don, Verbs, etc. Play the kids in the right positions, with the support of the right senior players to aid their development (which means no more game time for Saddo, Ackland, etc) and if we win, we win. If we lose 8 more, we lose 8 more. So be it. And if we need to rest players with niggling injuries or get those to surgery that need it, I would do it without question. Have them right for next year. Don't play Gibbs this week if there is any chance of his ankle being damaged further.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:18 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
nytdog wrote:
Top post. Thinking deaper that the one dimensional "get ONE extra pick at the top and be a force for 10 years". What a ridiculous thread title.

I agree with Don, Verbs, etc. Play the kids in the right positions, with the support of the right senior players to aid their development (which means no more game time for Saddo, Ackland, etc) and if we win, we win. If we lose 8 more, we lose 8 more. So be it. And if we need to rest players with niggling injuries or get those to surgery that need it, I would do it without question. Have them right for next year. Don't play Gibbs this week if there is any chance of his ankle being damaged further.


So in other words TANK! :lol:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 4:30 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
Nice try Jars... what is it about what I said that makes you think i support tanking?

Tanking means playing with the purpose of losing. Instead of focusing on a negative way to improve our club, lets focus on the positives things that we have control over... list management, development, etc. I'm not going to go on because all I'll do is repeat myself and repeat the posts of about another 10 posters who have already said it perfectly earlier in the thread.

Not sure we want to get into a debate on this thread about whether you should play injured players when we have no chance of playing finals.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:18 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Jarusa wrote:
verbs wrote:
Speaking of Collingwood, they had a graphic during the St Kilda game saying they had played 8 debutants this year. I haven't bothered to check if that's true, but if it is that's HUGE consideringthey are sitting 4th with a dinosaur as their coach.

BUT...it then said they are ranked No1 in the league, I assume statistically.


Last week Collingwood had 4 players in their team who had debuted in 2007.

Carlton also had 4 players in its team who had debuted in 2007.

Check out the leadership group to see the difference in the sides.


Jars do you know what numbers in the draft Collingwoods players were picked at - compared to Carltons debutants? I wonder how a team full of non first rounders against a team of first rounders would compare.

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 9:47 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21594
Location: North of the border
It looks like the AFL is set to shaft the club again - Just when they have come to terms with the whole tanking theory and using the draft to build a list - It looks like the free agency is going to come into place and all the players we have been developing for 4 or so years will be free to go where ever they want .

Watch this space could be interesting

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:21 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Sydney Blue wrote:
It looks like the AFL is set to shaft the club again - Just when they have come to terms with the whole tanking theory and using the draft to build a list - It looks like the free agency is going to come into place and all the players we have been developing for 4 or so years will be free to go where ever they want .

Watch this space could be interesting

Don't be too upset. It might mean a return to the clubs with money or a rich prez winning the premierships. i.e. in Melb, Carl, Coll, Rich, Ess plus the SA and WA clubs.
Sydney and Brisbane will go down the gurgler because they don't have a traditional supporter base and their sponsors will jump pretty fast if they are bottom four for long.
The AFL won't let it be open slather. They tried it once in the 1970's and it was a disaster. North bought all the players they wanted with more than 10 years experience and won a premiership as a result. The idea was quashed after one or two years and has been resisted ever since. The AFLPA is pushing it to get more money for their payers. The AFL is resisting it in the aim of having an even comp. The AFL will get their way even if freeagency does come in. The salary cap will mean it will be hard for decent players to move.
E.G. (Hypothetical of course)
Buckley wants to win a premiership and knows he has only one year left so decides to go to West Coast. West Coast know that with Buckley they are a dead cert so they say OK.
Who is going to be cut from West Coast to fit in Buckley? If he agrees to play for less than his market value, , Collingwood will have the right (under the AFL proposed system as I understand it) to match the offer and he will have to stay at Collingwood. The AFL wants to include this clause so (for example) Fevola wouldn't sign with the West Coast for $200K for one year and then renegotiate for $500K after one year for a three year term.
It will be VERY complicated and won't happen any time soon.
We will win at least one more game this year and so this thread will be irrelevant.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:20 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Carey could be right about our list...we have Gibbs, Murphy, Walker and then plenty of question marks next to a whole lot of young players.
We need some more no brainers like Gibbs and Murphy were....not more question marks....Kruezer is another no brainer.
The draft system will change and it will probablybe a lottery type affair with no priority picks... we could end up down the bottom for ages but keep drawing the long straws and missing out.
You have to take your opportunities when they present themselves and this is one of those times.......we dont need to win anymore games this year,its that simple....we cant win the flag so lets win at the draft....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:51 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 5245
ScottSaunders wrote:
i will never support deliberate attempts at losing

if we get the picks, the so be it, if we win more games, so be it

but the day i accept trying to lose as something remotely acceptable, is the day i no longer follow the club or the game.


Welcome to the wonderful world of the "even competition"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 396 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group